Debate Mansion
Debate Mansion

India-Forums

   

SEXUALITY debate: Why can't people live their life (Page 4)

Damyanthi Goldie
Damyanthi
Damyanthi

Joined: 30 June 2010
Posts: 2381

Posted: 02 December 2011 at 10:53am | IP Logged
Originally posted by _twilight_

If homosexuality is as positive and natural as someone earlier said why is it not generally  accepted or encouraged by religion or society?
It is positive and normal, it is just that not many people are homosexual or bisexual. Generally sex for pleasure is considered a sin. But in a hetrosexual relationship, especially between husband and wife, the couple can preted to have sex only for the purpose of producing offspring. Most relegions beleive that the aim of sex is to have offspring. Since homosexual relationships were not common and did not involve any "nobel" end product such as the birth of children, it was considered a sin. And something that was considered wrong for so many years cannot suddenly become right. It will take time for people to accept such views and to accept such people.

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

aanyakunatSmritiKatha

_Angie_ IF-Rockerz
_Angie_
_Angie_

Joined: 21 February 2008
Posts: 9888

Posted: 02 December 2011 at 11:08am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Petrouska

Originally posted by _twilight_

If homosexuality is as positive and natural as someone earlier said why is it not generally  accepted or encouraged by religion or society?
It is positive and normal, it is just that not many people are homosexual or bisexual. Generally sex for pleasure is considered a sin. But in a hetrosexual relationship, especially between husband and wife, the couple can preted to have sex only for the purpose of producing offspring. Most relegions beleive that the aim of sex is to have offspring. Since homosexual relationships were not common and did not involve any "nobel" end product such as the birth of children, it was considered a sin. And something that was considered wrong for so many years cannot suddenly become right. It will take time for people to accept such views and to accept such people.
Sin or not, procreation was and is considered to be important . There would be social implications. The social impact was given priority  to individual cravings.

As the numbers of LGBT increase in a particular community or nation  the population growth of that region or group would decline. This could be a cause for some concern especially as the other less tolerant or accommodating groups could soon outgrow  the former. That seems to impart an evolutionary disadvantage to a community.

return_to_hades IF-Veteran Member
return_to_hades
return_to_hades

Joined: 18 January 2006
Posts: 21475

Posted: 02 December 2011 at 11:14am | IP Logged
^^

Considering that a lot of lesbian couples do choose to have kids through artificial insemination that is not as much of a concern. Gay men also donate to sperm banks which are used by straight couples, single women and lesbians. So in modern society procreation is not as much of a concern as it was in the past.

 

As a matter of fact we have population explosion in many parts and too many orphan/abandoned children. In some parts instead of women (lesbian or straight) bearing more children, it would be better for society if all couples adopted unfortunate children.


The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

aanyakunat-Chandramukhi-

_Angie_ IF-Rockerz
_Angie_
_Angie_

Joined: 21 February 2008
Posts: 9888

Posted: 02 December 2011 at 11:25am | IP Logged
Originally posted by return_to_hades

^^Considering that a lot of lesbian couples do choose to have kids through artificial insemination that is not as much of a concern. Gay men also donate to sperm banks which are used by straight couples, single women and lesbians. So in modern society procreation is not as much of a concern as it was in the past.

 As a matter of fact we have population explosion in many parts and too many orphan/abandoned children. In some parts instead of women (lesbian or straight) bearing more children, it would be better for society if all couples adopted unfortunate children.

I foresee a time when  no humans would be allowed to procreate . Its unfair to the women and they could  exert their rights not to.  With further advances in technology babies would be custom made as and when required... till then the bias is set to remain esp as people do go to great lengths to have their own biological and genetic child.
return_to_hades IF-Veteran Member
return_to_hades
return_to_hades

Joined: 18 January 2006
Posts: 21475

Posted: 02 December 2011 at 11:32am | IP Logged
Originally posted by angie.4u

Originally posted by return_to_hades

^^Considering that a lot of lesbian couples do choose to have kids through artificial insemination that is not as much of a concern. Gay men also donate to sperm banks which are used by straight couples, single women and lesbians. So in modern society procreation is not as much of a concern as it was in the past.

 As a matter of fact we have population explosion in many parts and too many orphan/abandoned children. In some parts instead of women (lesbian or straight) bearing more children, it would be better for society if all couples adopted unfortunate children.

I foresee a time when  no humans would be allowed to procreate . Its unfair to the women and they could  exert their rights not to.  With further advances in technology babies would be custom made as and when required... till then the bias is set to remain esp as people do go to great lengths to have their own biological and genetic child.


All Hail Bokanovsky! Bokanovsky! Bokanovsky!
_Angie_ IF-Rockerz
_Angie_
_Angie_

Joined: 21 February 2008
Posts: 9888

Posted: 02 December 2011 at 11:33am | IP Logged
Originally posted by return_to_hades

Originally posted by angie.4u

Originally posted by return_to_hades

^^Considering that a lot of lesbian couples do choose to have kids through artificial insemination that is not as much of a concern. Gay men also donate to sperm banks which are used by straight couples, single women and lesbians. So in modern society procreation is not as much of a concern as it was in the past.

 As a matter of fact we have population explosion in many parts and too many orphan/abandoned children. In some parts instead of women (lesbian or straight) bearing more children, it would be better for society if all couples adopted unfortunate children.

I foresee a time when  no humans would be allowed to procreate . Its unfair to the women and they could  exert their rights not to.  With further advances in technology babies would be custom made as and when required... till then the bias is set to remain esp as people do go to great lengths to have their own biological and genetic child.


All Hail Bokanovsky! Bokanovsky! Bokanovsky!
And who or what was that !!
return_to_hades IF-Veteran Member
return_to_hades
return_to_hades

Joined: 18 January 2006
Posts: 21475

Posted: 02 December 2011 at 11:36am | IP Logged
A fictional person who invented cloning and baby manufacturing lines in Brave New World - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokanovsky%27s_process


_Angie_ IF-Rockerz
_Angie_
_Angie_

Joined: 21 February 2008
Posts: 9888

Posted: 02 December 2011 at 11:51am | IP Logged
Originally posted by return_to_hades

A fictional person who invented cloning and baby manufacturing lines in Brave New World - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokanovsky%27s_process


A highly controlled social world ! Wont be long before people start demanding freedom from such controlled systems . ..

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
The Cyber Culture Discussion/Debate

2

Author: return_to_hades   Replies: 15   Views: 1495

return_to_hades 15 1495 01 July 2010 at 4:39pm by the_Naked_face
Debate Contest (COMPLETED)

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 32 33

Author: return_to_hades   Replies: 256   Views: 13219

return_to_hades 256 13219 28 June 2010 at 8:13am by return_to_hades
Debate Contest Winners

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 18 19

Author: return_to_hades   Replies: 149   Views: 9616

return_to_hades 149 9616 23 June 2010 at 9:41pm by krystal_watz
Artificial life abroad Vs life in India?

2 3 4

Author: raj5000   Replies: 28   Views: 6536

raj5000 28 6536 10 July 2007 at 3:11pm by Gauri_3
Home life or Hostel life

2

Author: Swapna-Mobile   Replies: 14   Views: 6887

Swapna-Mobile 14 6887 06 February 2007 at 1:36am by realitybites

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Debate Mansion Topic Index

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index