Debate Mansion

   

why award shows are a bit of a joke???

Post Reply New Post

Page 1 of 1

chatterbox

IF-Sizzlerz

chatterbox

Joined: 01 May 2005

Posts: 22110

Posted: 06 February 2006 at 1:36am | IP Logged
Why award shows are a bit of a joke

Lindsay Pereira | February 06, 2006 12:11 IST

Sunday night is awards night. That is pretty much a given. Channel surf any time after 8 pm, and chances are you'll find some Bollywood starlet doing her thing before an audience comprising bigger starlets, a smattering of stars, directors and the ubiquitous music composers.

The format is the same. After a minute or two of frantic, canned applause, the cameras roam the aisles, stopping for a few seconds at every celebrity, major or minor. Then, to more canned applause -- tragically heard at moments when the cameras pinpoint bored people who aren't moving their hands at all -- the anchors step on stage. There are always two of them. And they are always, always bad. They stare out at their teleprompters to mouth sentences, in bad accents, that often begin with: "And now, to set the stage on fire…"

Then, the fog machines go off, there's a relatively minor display of pyrotechnics, and another star hits the stage backed by women in shiny clothing. It almost makes you wish they'd set the stage on fire.

Where do these awards come from anyway? In the past, it was assorted film magazines that took on the onus of awarding the blazing talent our industry routinely displays in products such as Hero No 1. Then, corporates began stepping in, tagging their company names to the word 'Awards'. Now, it's anybody's guess. Telecom companies, television channels, random groups comprising producers' wives -- everyone has an award show going. Worse, they all promise to be annual affairs.

What makes the whole thing a little absurd is the fact that there are, in any given year, just about 10 films worthy of praise. Even 10 may be a generous figure, but I am no movie critic so let's just leave it at that. Now, take the said 10 films and juxtapose the 50 award shows. See what I mean?

It explains why India is possibly the only country in the world where a film like Kaho Na Pyaar Hai can gather a staggering 102 awards in twelve months!

Don't get me wrong. Rakesh Roshan may be a good director. The film may be a good one. Possibly, a great one. And Hrithik Roshan isn't bad looking at all either. But 102 awards for a rather twisted love story?

It wouldn't be so bad if the award shows were entertaining. But they are anything but. When you've reconciled yourself to the bad anchors, there are the lacklustre performances to get over. Performances both on and off stage. On, it's the half-hearted lip-synching I have never managed to make sense of. The stars don't really sing. The little skits they perform are badly choreographed. And the songs are either random hits from recent films, or classics revived for newer stars to prance to. So, what exactly is the point? Why not have stuntmen, mimicry artistes, singers or comedians instead?

Offstage, it's performances of another kind. First, the famous faces have to feign interest in happenings onstage whenever there's a camera pointing at them. Then, they have to feign excitement at the prospect of yet another nomination or award. At one award show a couple of Sundays ago, a television actress punched the air a couple of times, giggling madly and rushing towards the stage when she found out her serial had won something.

She plays a mother-in-law or a daughter-in-law. They all do.

There's a reason awards exist. They are meant to congratulate some and encourage others. They are created to boost morale and enhance quality. To make appreciation a more tangible thing. Our film awards, sadly, have more to do with sponsorship and television ratings than any of the above. If they can't get the stars they want, categories are often invented to accommodate those who condescend to attend. It's easy to figure that part out when almost everyone who wins somehow turns up on stage. This happens week after mind-numbing week.

At some point, the stars may simply stop coming. There are just so many awards one can take, after all. And only so many shows one can attend and smile at. Maybe when that happens, we can go back to a time when there were just one or two awards that actually meant something.

For those who feel the desperate need to initiate a new award, consider this. Instead of throwing away more statuettes at film stars who rarely deserve them, why not have more awards for students instead? Or entrepreneurs? Or for people who risk their lives daily? Why insist on creating more awards for an industry that simply churns out five decent products a year?

Initiate an award that makes sense. Then, whether you name it after your favourite aunt or your pet dog, at least its reasons for being are justified. Then that happens, I promise to sit up and pay attention.


Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "why award shows are a bit of a joke???" in Debate Mansion forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

chatterbox

IF-Sizzlerz

chatterbox

Joined: 01 May 2005

Posts: 22110

Posted: 06 February 2006 at 1:38am | IP Logged
do u all also think same? please discuss ur views here
personally i think what is written above is true to large extent.
its total waste of time money energy

p.s this article was on rediff.com

rebelqueen

Senior Member

rebelqueen

Joined: 15 November 2005

Posts: 576

Posted: 06 February 2006 at 6:00am | IP Logged
hi-i totally agree wid this article.....absolute waste of maney and other resources.this may b out of context
but i also find the jury awards a bit wierd...i think nobody's a judge on nybody's performance here-i personally feel the only reward 4 ny actor shud b the box-office..who r all these ppl who decide who's 2 win???the def don't represent india...i hate it when a grp of ppl r selected 2 decide who's the winner...
all ppl work hard-most of them r gud..soo y choose and discriminate...many a time some ppl r even favoured 4 personal reasons...so i think such awards have no meaning and value-but if the award is chosen by the public then it's ok i guess(provided there's no mainpulation done)

AbsolutelyNuts!

Newbie

AbsolutelyNuts!

Joined: 05 February 2006

Posts: 9

Posted: 06 February 2006 at 7:21am | IP Logged
I agree. And while I love Juhi Chawla as an actress, she and Karan Johar make the worst hosts in award shows.

Each award show has dances with female backup dancers wearing lesser and lesser each time. I don't understand it. I think you can dance pretty good without having to strip down, you know? What's the point of dancing with practically nothing on?

SuperDuper01

Senior Member

SuperDuper01

Joined: 08 October 2005

Posts: 655

Posted: 06 February 2006 at 8:44am | IP Logged
gree wid all of u...........Award shows r juz to courage the ppl..........thats it.....nothing more.......and simply wastage of time and money both

~LiL*PrInCeZ~

IF-Sizzlerz

~LiL*PrInCeZ~

--

Joined: 20 October 2004

Posts: 11310

Posted: 06 February 2006 at 1:23pm | IP Logged
yea i agree....with the gazillion award shows tht india has der not worth nething...if there was 1 big award show tht meant everything and it wud "FAIRLY" judge the ppl thn even bening nomin8ed wud b a success...nowadaiiz even winning isnt tht big...with sooo many award functions ur bound 2 win sumthng sumwhere...or 1 silm wins 126540 awards

u noe how we have th oscars or the emmys here....itz 1 award show and every1 is in2 it and it is made a big deal and all....well if india had jus ONE award show it wud b worth a lot more

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
Reality of Reality Shows - ROFL

2

Meena1 13 778 16 February 2010 at 11:56am
By RUSmart
why are LIFTS COMPULSORY FOR INDIAN SHOWS??

2 3 4 5 6 7

krystal_watz 53 4061 27 December 2009 at 10:29pm
By krystal_watz
Life On Mars Or NASA's Joke

2 3

bunbutt_too 16 1084 06 February 2008 at 9:07pm
By Gauri_3
TV and socially relevant causes, a Joke ? bips 2 532 06 March 2007 at 8:34pm
By raj5000
Not a Joke!!!

2 3 4 5 6

IdeaQueen 45 1612 01 March 2007 at 6:28am
By SolidSnake

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.