+* Pandava parivar *+ (Page 2)

Thanks,once again,  Vrish.

vaarali

It is unclear.  My initial reading was first Abhimanyu, then the others, but from the way it's written, Draupadi could well have given birth to Prativindya, and been pregnant w/ Satsoma @ the time Subhadra came to her.  The way the above is written doesn't rule that out.

That brings me to another question.  You may have heard of a story about how Arjun was narrating to Subhadra how to exit a chakravyuha, but it being pretty boring for a pregnant woman, she fell asleep, and Abhimanyu never got to learn it, w/ fatal consequences.  If that was there, shouldn't it have been there in the above cited section?  I checked out Abhimanyuvadh parva, but even that didn't have such a story.  So I wonder - where did it originate?

As for Chitrangada, her father had been raising her as a prince, and I think her tomboyish attributes might have been what attracted Arjun to her.  So had she given birth to a daughter, that daughter too might have been raised as a prince, but it would have been some burden on the dynasty.  Incidentally, after the Ashwamedha yagna, Chitrangada lived w/ Arjun in Hastinapur, but when the Pandavas decided to retire, she returned to Manipur, Uloopi returned to her watery kingdom in Nagaland, while the other Pandava wives remained w/ Parikshit.

That brings up another question.  During the vanvaas, I understand, the Pandava queens had to go to their maaykas and raise their sons to prepare for the war.  But at the end of it all, why did only Draupadi accompany the Pandavas in their journey to heaven?  Parikshit was 36 years old, so presumably old enough to rule.  So all the queens of the Pandavas - Devika, Hidimba, Uloopi, Chitrangada, Subhadra, Karenmati and Vijaya - all should have accompanied their husbands on that final journey, no?  Uttara could have been left in company of Parikshit.  (In the ACK, after Arjun enthroned Vajra, he left Subhadra w/ him to take care, but in the Mahabharata, it's mentioned that she and other queens stayed on w/ Parikshit.  In which case, even if all the Yadava queens had ended their lives, Vajra's mother - be it Rochana or Usha - should have stayed w/ him, no?)  Any idea why the Pandava queens chose/agreed to stay on w/ Parikshit?


Edited by _Vrish_ - 19 September 2011 at 1:26am

Okay, I have in front of me the book 'Who is who in the Mahabharata' by Subash Mazumdar, so I can fill in some of the things we discussed in the last few pages.

As for the Yadavas during the Ashwamedha yagna, both Ugrasena & Vasudev prevented the Yadavas from capturing the horse

On the vanvas question, you are right that Draupadi didn't feel the need to raise her children during her husbands' exile.  However, she was the exception, and I wasn't asking why the other wives didn't stay w/ the Pandavas.  In the Mahabharata, Dhrishtadyumna was reported as having taken her sons to Panchala, but in the book I cited, Rukmini was said to have helped Subhadra raise Abhimanyu and  Draupadi's sons.

My question, though was about the end, when the Pandavas retired.  In the case of Krishna, some of his widows self-immolated, while some others retired to the Himalayas to do tapasya.  In the case of the Pandava wives, they could have, like Draupadi, left w/ their husbands, who were on the journey to swargalok: yeah, they too would probably have died along the way, but wouldn't they have wanted to accompany their husbands?  Chitrangada returned to Manipur to live w/ Babruvahana, which certainly made more sense than living w/ Parikshit, while Uloopi went underwater - it's unclear whether she ended her life, or returned to her original watery kingdom in Nagaland. 

Nirmitra or Suhotra or Yaudheya - there is no record of them after the war, which suggests that they died during the war.  Had they lived, the least that would have happened would have been that the Pandavas would have made them ministers or guardians of Parikshit when they retired, instead of leaving him to Yuyutsu.  All evidence suggests that except for Babruvahana, there were no living sons of the Pandavas.

The Ashwamedhika Parva of Jaimineya Mahabharata has some  interesting details. 

Vaarali

Are these in the KMG version, or some other?  I'm very happy to learn that the Pandavas did have sons who survived - I'd be happy to know that Nirmitra, Suhotra and other sons of the Pandavas did survive.  Vrishasena was the eldest of Karna's sons, and was killed by Arjun b4 Arjun-Karna's final battle.  So Vrishaketu must be the name of the son who survived.  It's nice that he was accepted by the Pandavas into the family.  Are there any online links where I can read more about it?

The more I think about it, I think that Yudhisthir decided that the succession would be the result of the matrimonial alliance b/w the Pandavas and the Vrishnis.  So had Abhimanyu survived, he'd have been yuvraj even instead of Bhima, and succeeded the throne.  Since Parikshit was just born, Bhima was made the yuvraj of Yudhisthir (just like Bharat was yuvraj of Rama) and held that post until the Pandavas retired.  Then, just like Kush succeeded Rama, Parikshit succeeded Yudhisthir.  That would explain why Yudhisthir didn't make any of his other sons/nephews his successors, but probably just entrusted them w/ ministerial duties, like he did Yuyutsu.

Edited by varaali - 11 October 2011 at 11:22pm