Dwarkadheesh - Bhagwaan Shree Krishna

India-Forums

   
Dwarkadheesh - Bhagwaan Shree Krishna
Dwarkadheesh - Bhagwaan Shree Krishna

TVR RATING 11/9 TO 17/9 (Page 4)

.Vrish. Viewbie
.Vrish.
.Vrish.

Joined: 25 October 2008
Posts: 26250

Posted: 27 September 2011 at 5:02am | IP Logged
First things first - I've rarely watched JSK (except when I caught Vasudev in psycho mode), so won't comment on it here.

But on DBSK, I'm missing the complaints about the Narakasura track.  IMO, it was one of the finest tracks they did - the costumes (except of course Satyabhama's) were pretty authentic, unlike that of Jarasandha's allies, the story was also quite accurate (except the Satyabhama haran part and the attempted suicide by Narakasura's captive women).  So I just didn't get how anyone can claim that it was dragged.  Sudama's story is dragged - we're now in week 3.  I have no idea of whether Chakradhar was real or not, but I do think that yesterday's scene would have been on day 4 of week 1.

Also, analyzing this serial, I'll say it's been continuously improving.  At the beginning, when they'd show Krishna fleeing from battles w/o explaining the original contexts, him mocking Balarama, Rukmi acting like another Kansa, that was when they had it completely screwed up.  And the costumes worn by Jarasandha and his allies was just laughable, and less so was Balarama's helmet.  It continued that way when they showed the incident w/ Kritavarma's child, and Devaki's behavior w/ Krishna.

In the Syamantaka gem episodes, it was a mixed bag - they totally butchered Satrajit's character, and in the process made Krishna look greedy.  This was inexcusable.  Then they showed BRKR doing an puja to Ganesh, and later, another puja to Mahadev to trump Ganesh Wacko  And Rukmini's character was totally shredded - the way she'd tremble @ those apshakuns was like she was Mandodari, rather than Rukmini.  I never thought anyone could screw up a Rukmini act, but Priya showed one how.

Narakasura was in fact the turning point - all the episodes shown were authentic, except of course the capture of Satyabhama.  This of course depends on which version one follows - the original had Krishna killing Mura & his sons w/ ease, and then Narakasura: Satyabhama was just there for the sightseeing.  One version had Satyabhama herself fight Narakasura, and in the serial, they showed them both killing him.  The context of what Narakasura did was important, so the coverage given to him was appropriate.

I agree the parijat & tulabharam episodes were twisted, and this serial seems to have given Jambavati a long leash while losing Rukmini.  Right now, Rukmini's only remaining role is the birth of Pradhyumna, which could even be a cameo role, since she's just there having given birth to him, and then loses him.  The last time they showed her, she was welcoming Krishna & Satyabhama back from their battle, but didn't say anything.  The role that is left could possibly be done by Priya's double.

For the balance, depending on what they show, Satyabhama in MB meets Draupadi during the Pandava exile, while according to SB, all wives of Krishna met Draupadi and told them their stories about how they married Krishna.  Given what they've been showing, it makes more sense to focus on the MB version.  Rukmini did have a role in helping Subhadra raise Abhimanyu and Draupadi's kids, but other than that, not much else.  None of Krishna's wives have a Sita like role in his story.

It will be interesting to see what they show once Sudama is over.

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

mnx12

sitakshii IF-Stunnerz
sitakshii
sitakshii

Joined: 01 September 2005
Posts: 28668

Posted: 27 September 2011 at 5:16am | IP Logged
vrish i just didnot like these things in the Narkasur episodes
1. The lady playing satyabhama ..uff she is just so terrible
2 the black colour of Garuda ,it was giving a look of a crow to Garuda...i wish they shd hv shown a white GARUDA ...instead of the black one ...

3. the actor who played Narkasur was so over dramatic...

4. Repeating same lines and those same ahankaar scenes and abduction of Satyabhama and the way they showed Narkasur holding satyabham awith her hair was just not done ..it was all so fake...


The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

.Vrish.

..RamKiJanaki.. IF-Addictz
..RamKiJanaki..
..RamKiJanaki..

Joined: 20 August 2008
Posts: 59662

Posted: 27 September 2011 at 8:16am | IP Logged
The Narakasur track was not tooo bad, especially when we compare it to the 100% fictional Kritavarma one, but the actress playing Satyabhama is what ruined it for me...she made Satyabhama's character seem like a spoiled little brat and though Satyabhama was supposed to be a little proud, she was also respectful and mindful of her manners. She was said to be the avatar of Bhumi Devi after all, so there should be an amount of grace and dignity in an actress playing her.

Though the Sudama track is being dragged like the Sudama track of SK, it seems very natural and accurate, which is the reason I love it. The actor playing Sudama is also amazing, so it's really nice to see him and Vishal together onscreen.Clap


The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

mnx12sitakshii

.Vrish. Viewbie
.Vrish.
.Vrish.

Joined: 25 October 2008
Posts: 26250

Posted: 27 September 2011 at 1:15pm | IP Logged
Okay, I see the finer points of your stand...

Originally posted by sita11

vrish i just didnot like these things in the Narkasur episodes
1. The lady playing satyabhama ..uff she is just so terrible  True, but that's true in general, not just this track.  Actually, I have somewhat mixed opinions about her - she has her moments when she's just admirable, whether it's telling her servant to pick up a thali that has just fallen instead of trembling like Rukmini @ the apshakuns, rallying the women of Narakasura to rebel against him, and so on.  Otoh, there are times when she's just abominable, like when she accuses Krishna of lying right in his face Dead 
2 the black colour of Garuda ,it was giving a look of a crow to Garuda...i wish they shd hv shown a white GARUDA ...instead of the black one ... I agree, but think they should have had a Garuda similar to the one they had in ASR, who saved Rama & Lakshman from the naagpash.  Garuda didn't so much look like a crow, but he did look strange.  Also, to pick a singularly old guy to play Garuda's human form was really odd - that guy, as some other poster remarked, may as well have played Ugrasena
3. the actor who played Narkasur was so over dramatic... Maybe, but I thought he matched Narakasura's profile reasonably well, except for being barefooted.  I mean, the same Narakasura who robbed Indra, Varuna & Aditi couldn't find shoes in heaven that suited him?  Also, like all villains in the story, they villified him even more than necessary by showing him as having imprisoned Mura's sons and telling Mura on his face that he expected him to lay down his life for him in the quest to separate Krishna & Satyabhama: even Ravana wasn't as brazen.
4. Repeating same lines and those same ahankaar scenes and abduction of Satyabhama and the way they showed Narkasur holding satyabham awith her hair was just not done ..it was all so fake...  Yeah, that part - Satyabhama's capture - was totally fake, and it looked like they were trying to replay Ravana-Sita in that part.  The ahankar scenes were okay, but Naraka wasn't just after new women - he was after all sorts of wealth as well.

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

mnx12sitakshii

sitakshii IF-Stunnerz
sitakshii
sitakshii

Joined: 01 September 2005
Posts: 28668

Posted: 28 September 2011 at 10:33am | IP Logged
yup vrish the actor who played GARUDA was so fat ...totally weird as garuda ...

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

.Vrish.

mnx12 Moderator
mnx12
mnx12

Joined: 02 August 2010
Posts: 20432

Posted: 29 September 2011 at 2:04am | IP Logged
sitakshii IF-Stunnerz
sitakshii
sitakshii

Joined: 01 September 2005
Posts: 28668

Posted: 29 September 2011 at 5:26am | IP Logged
Originally posted by mnx12

Saurabh Tewari quits Imagine tv.


good as the Imagine channel was going on high lossess and hope that the new creative head of imagine listen to the requests of Dwarikadhish show fans
 now we the viewers wud get rid of the stupid Rakhi shows ...LOLLOL


Edited by sita11 - 29 September 2011 at 5:27am

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

.Vrish.

Go to top

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Dwarkadheesh - Bhagwaan Shree Krishna Topic Index

  • Please login to check your Last 10 Topics posted

Check these Celebrity also

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index