Debate Mansion
Debate Mansion

India-Forums

   

Do you believe there is a God ? (Page 83)

return_to_hades IF-Veteran Member
return_to_hades
return_to_hades

Joined: 18 January 2006
Posts: 21527

Posted: 09 February 2012 at 3:37pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by God.


but if you wanna call that mysterious impersonal cause that sparked everything, as "god".. then no problem.. but why call it god at all when it has no connection to the traditional theistic concept.


Because God is not the property of the theists alone, deists and other ontological philosophies have the right to define their 'God' too. Although there are other terms in place like 'Tao' and 'The Force'.
Summer3 IF-Stunnerz
Summer3
Summer3

Joined: 24 September 2007
Posts: 44280

Posted: 09 February 2012 at 7:53pm | IP Logged
Nice write up on Allah:
 
 
 

 Is Allah the Name of God?

Allah is the name of the only God in Islam. Allah is a pre-Islamic name coming from the compound Arabic word Al-ilah which means the God, which is derived from al (the) ilah (deity).

The Arabic name for "God" is the word "Al-ilah." It is a generic title for whatever god was considered the highest god. Different Arab tribes used "Allah" to refer to its personal high god.  "Allah" was being worshipped at the Kaa'ba in Mecca by Arabs prior to the time of Mohammed. It was formerly the name of the chief god among the numerous idols (360) in the Kaaba in Mecca before Mohammed made them into monotheists. Historians have shown that the moon god called "Hubal" was the god to whom Arabs prayed at the Kaa'ba and they used the name "Allah" when they prayed.

Today a Muslim is one who submits to the God Allah.

Islam means submission to (Allah), but originally it meant that strength which characterized a desert warrior who, even when faced with impossible odds, would fight to the death for his tribe. (Dr. M. Baravmann, The Spiritual Background of Early Islam, E. J. Brill, Leiden, 1972)

Many believe the word "Allah" was derived from the mid- eastern word "el" which in Ugaritic, Caananite and Hebrew can mean a true or false God. This is not the case, "The source of this (Allah) goes back to pre-Muslim times. Allah is not a common name meaning "God" (or a "god"), and the Muslim must use another word or form if he wishes to indicate any other than his own peculiar deity." (Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics (ed. Hastings), I:326.)

According to the Encyclopedia of Religion, Allah corresponded to the Babylonian god Baal, and Arabs knew of him long before Mohammed worshipped him as the supreme God. Before Islam the Arabs recognized many gods and goddesses, each tribe had their own deity. There were also nature deities. Allah was the god of the local Quarish tribe, which was Mohammed's tribe before he invented Islam to lead his people out of their polytheism. Allah was then known as the Moon God, who had 3 daughters who were viewed as intercessors for the people into Allah. Their names were Al-at, Al-uzza, and Al-Manat, which were three goddesses; the first two daughters of Allah had names which were feminine forms of Allah. Hubal was the chief God of the Kaaba among the other 360 deities. Hubal was the chief God of the Kaaba among the other 360 deities. Hubal was a statue likeness of a man whose body was made of red precious stones whose arms were made of gold. (Reference Islam George Braswell Jr.)

"Historians like Vaqqidi have said Allah was actually the chief of the 360 gods being worshipped in Arabia at the time Mohammed rose to prominence. Ibn Al-Kalbi gave 27 names of pre-Islamic deities...Interestingly, not many Muslims want to accept that Allah was already being worshipped at the Ka'ba in Mecca by Arab pagans before Mohammed came. Some Muslims become angry when they are confronted with this fact. But history is not on their side. Pre-Islamic literature has proved this." (G. J. O. Moshay, Who Is This Allah? (Dorchester House, Bucks, UK, 1994), pg. 138).

History has shown Mecca and the holy stone al-Kaaba were holy sites for pre-Islamic pagan Arabs. The Kaaba in Mecca was formerly named Beit-Allah meaning House of Allah. We are told it was first built in heaven. This is in contradistinction to what Moses was instructed to build, something overlooked by the Muslims in their reading of the Bible.

The Koran tells us that Mohammed drove the other idols away; he made one God now the only god and he was its messenger. He kept the Kaaba as a holy, sacred place and confirmed that the black stone had the power to take away man's sins. He obligated every believer to make a pilgrimage to the stone at least once in his lifetime. (Sura 22:26-37) No Old Testament saint ever had a pilgrimage to the Kaaba and kissed its black stone despite stories that Abraham and Ishmael restored it.

 
 

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

RehanismKStewartFanatic

-Believe- IF-Stunnerz
-Believe-
-Believe-

Joined: 03 December 2005
Posts: 27081

Posted: 17 February 2012 at 1:28am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Tanya.91

For all detracted people


 
No doubt Mr.Naik is a Good preacher and Good bussiness minded guy!! same like SRK...he is good actor and bussiness minded guy...!! some sell entertainment...others try to sell religion..different ways!! and like this people all running Charity foundations cos its easy way to save bulk money without tax...even Bill Gates also have Charity foundation!Smile
 
Now a days nobody ready to experiance or read and understand ...but...everybody like to listen others perceptions and Ideas about God!!!!Smile
 
 
 
 


Edited by Prometeus - 17 February 2012 at 2:32am
Rehanism IF-Dazzler
Rehanism
Rehanism

Joined: 07 August 2010
Posts: 3458

Posted: 17 February 2012 at 6:58am | IP Logged
Oh no! Not the stammering goat again!! Last time I heard him say that wishing Merry Christmas would take you to hell and before that he suggested that 9 year old kids are fit for sex...I wonder how much he bribed to pass MBBS..I have hardly seen a more perfect combination of pseudo-intellectualism, shameless lying and sugar-coated bigotry...I would any day prefer Anjem Chaudhary..That guy might sound more menacing and fanatical, but atleast he's honest about his beliefs and intentions!



Edited by Rehanism - 17 February 2012 at 7:02am

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

.Stuff.hindu4lyf

Summer3 IF-Stunnerz
Summer3
Summer3

Joined: 24 September 2007
Posts: 44280

Posted: 17 February 2012 at 4:15pm | IP Logged
In truth everyone is a MessengerLOL
At times it seems that we are all puppets of the Absolute Consciousness and going deeper "that" and "this" merges into one. On the surface there is no denying that good and evil are as clear as day and night but all are the same consciousness in different roles. At times I think that I am myopic.

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

RehanismAutumn.

Summer3 IF-Stunnerz
Summer3
Summer3

Joined: 24 September 2007
Posts: 44280

Posted: 17 February 2012 at 4:16pm | IP Logged
A nice read:


If everything is One then there cannot be another to observe that One-ness. Unity or One-ness does not imply that there cannot be unity with an infinity of separate parts. Thus, the unity that is spoken about is of the one Energy of Consciousness that animates the billions of separate sentient entities. Manifestation with its billions of separate parts can only be image reflections in the one Universal Energy of Consciousness.

Since the only reality is Consciousness and reflections are only images with no substance to them how then can apparent reflections which seem to exist in duality have any absolute reality to them? Does this not imply that all that exists is Consciousness and that the objective universe itself is only a reflection or image within It? If the objective Universe is only an appearance or illusion in Consciousness then we too as individuals within that Universe are only mirror images without any substance.

The difficulty for most people who are unaware of this illusion is simply the inability to let go of the concept of a separate individuality. Not realizing that we are in truth the Universal, Pure Consciousness itself. Thus remaining in our self-imposed tiny individualised consciousnesses we become obsessed with its impending loss and the fear of sinking into the absolute nothingness of the fathomless void. It would be well to remember what some of the ancient and present Masters say about this feared void. It is not at all an absolute nothingness as portrayed by some, but is infinite, Potential Creation that actualizes it-Self periodically in eternal cycles.

It is what we are in our essence as the objective expression of the Subjective Reality. When the One-ness of all things is finally realized there would be no room left for believing that duality was not really only a Divine Play. That it only existed as a relative reality for the purpose of rediscovering our own truth.

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

be-happy-alwaysRehanism

Summer3 IF-Stunnerz
Summer3
Summer3

Joined: 24 September 2007
Posts: 44280

Posted: 18 February 2012 at 7:22am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Tanya.91

SAARAY BAYGHAIRAT BHATKAY HUWAY ATHEISTS PAR LAANAT
Cute Lizard siggiesLOL
Rehanism IF-Dazzler
Rehanism
Rehanism

Joined: 07 August 2010
Posts: 3458

Posted: 18 February 2012 at 11:24am | IP Logged

I was reading a comparative study of Western and Eastern religions and came across the following excerpt..Hope its taken in constructive way..

_________________________________________________________________________

Understanding the Concept of 'Religion'

How is the concept of "Religion" is perceived today? The following definitions explains some of the fundamental attributes that are associated with the term 'Religion' and explains how it is differs from dharma:

1. Adherence to One 'Book', 'Savior', and 'means of Worship'

There is a preconceived idea that is imposed or expected when a religion is defined based on the characteristics of Abrahamic religions. It is based on four main connotation such as, it should have:

  • a single founder (Prophet or Savior),
  • a single Holy Book and
  • a unified method of worship
  • a centralized hierarchy

This over simplistic and crude definition undermines the reality when it comes to defining a profound, diverse and sophisticated tradition such as Hinduism. The Hindu tradition neither has a single founder, a single holy book, an unified method of worship or a centralized hierarchy therefore it defies to meet the same criterion as it is with the Abrahamic religions. It is unfortunate that many times, attempts are made to fit the Hindu Dharma into this model, without considering the fact that the Hindu reality is fundamentally in contrast to these characteristics.

2. Conclusive, Exclusionary and Separative

The word religion as used in the standard form carries three connotations as reflected in the Abrahamic religions:

  • That a religion is conclusive, that is to say it is the one and only true religion;
  • That a religion is exclusionary, that is to say, those who don't follow it are excluded from salvation and
  • That a religion is separative, that is to say, in order to belong to it one must not belong to another.

These three notions of religion are not a universal idea and by and large do not express the reality of what are called Eastern religions. For instance, the conclusive and separative notion of religion implies that one can only be a member of one religion or another. In both Eastern and many indigenous societies, this does not hold true. In each of these three ways the notion of dharma, which is the original Indian concept, is very different from the notion of religion.

These three notions of religion – conclusive, exclusionary and separative, give Abrahamic religions a hard-edged identity. In Abrahamic religions there has been a strong emphasis on the separation of "believer" and "non-believer" and a religious imperative to move as many people from the latter category to the former. "Truth" has been conclusively and unquestionably revealed and captured in a book, and those that follow it are the only ones that are on the right path. Quite literally, this means that you are "with us or against us" – that the believers are right and represent the good who are "with God"; and all the others are misguided and are part of the darkness and deprived of any direct access to what is the ultimate good.

The worldview of the dharmic traditions is that while scriptures can be very helpful, Truth cannot be found by scripture alone but by a path of experiential realization and Self-discovery – and in that sense religion is not conclusive. It is also not separative and exclusive in the sense of dividing the world into believers and non-believers. The dharmic worldview is that there are many tribes throughout the world, and many teachers and teachings. Each tribe has good and bad people in a continuum; people that have a greater degree of access to truth and "goodness" are worthy of respect; and others less so. Since there is a continuum of "goodness" among individuals of each tribe, the need for converting other tribes to a particular conception of God as a religious imperative is not really there. A teacher can share his or her understanding of the truth; and means and ways for others to access this; but there is no underlying belief that only one such way exists. These ideas find clear expression as far back as the Rig Veda, with its famous quotation:

Ekam sad; vipra bahudha vadanti

while Truth is One, the wise describe it in different ways
— I.164.46 of the Rig Veda

So dharma itself does not create a religious identity. One's worldly self-identity in the dharmic model derives from one's local community, profession or ancestry, jati or kul, but that identity is not a religious identity, fundamentally opposed to the existence of the identity of the "other" as a manifestation of falsehood.

3. Science as Opposed to Religion

Some definitions are so broadly written that they include beliefs and areas of study that most people do not regard as religious. For example, David Edward's definition would seem to include cosmology and ecology within his definition of religion — fields of investigation that most people regard to be a scientific studies and non-religious in nature.

From a dharmic view, in principle there is no conflict between science and religion. In fact, the two fields are complementary. This is because of the understanding that the domain of each realm is well-defined.

In Hinduism there are two categories of knowledge, para vidya (the spiritual knowledge) and apara vidya (material knowledge). Scientific knowledge is the realm of apara vidya. Spiritual knowledge — knowledge of God and life — belongs to para vidya. Hinduism points out that scientific knowledge can lead to spiritual knowledge.

4. Solely based on Belief and Faith

Religion is generally associated with a belief in something unseen, miraculous or irrational. For many, religion is something removed from day to day life, and it is outside of our known world and also something supernatural. The God is sitting outside of the creation and watching us all the time with the balance of judgement! The fruits of the religious practice are often promised to be gained after death and sometimes based on some kind of fear for the unknown and unseen, and associated with the helplessness of human being. Occasionally believers are exploited by the religious heads or those forces, which use religion for social or political gains.

Belief is the basis of many religious traditions, especially the non-eastern ones. The dictionary meaning of the word "belief" is 'a state or habit of mind in which trust or confidence is placed in some person or thing' and not necessarily there exists a proof. As a matter of fact religion in the western world is neatly and simply defined as a "belief system" and the belief is called "truth". There is a "belief" in one God, one prophet and one book of revelation. This is true especially in Christianity and Islam. The right "belief" is said to bring about salvation and the wrong "belief" is supposed to bring about damnation. Such religions are trying to convert the entire world to their "belief". By doing so they hope to bring about salvation for the entire humanity!

These kinds of belief systems can state their beliefs in clear and uncomplicated terms and they often sound more like slogans or stereotypes. These are often appealing to an emotional need for certainty and security.

Life is not so simple and eight or ten formulas are too inadequate to solve life's problems! Why should belief be asserted? Why should any truth have to be imposed as it is done by religions of the world? Does not the truth of things speak for itself if we are open to it? We know that if we protect the earth it will remain as our place for living - we don't have to 'believe' it.

Do we have to 'believe' that Ahimsha or non-violence is a great virtue? Do we have to 'believe' that vegetarianism is good for our health, environment and economy or we know these for fact by experience?

We also frequently use another word: Faith. In the dictionary faith has several meanings: 'allegiance to duty or person', 'belief and trust in the loyalty of God', 'belief in the traditional doctrines of religion', 'firm belief in something in which there is no proof' and 'complete confidence'. If faith means an openness of the heart to truth, which looks beyond belief and the aspiration to the truth then it is appropriate. The word faith in many cases is also associated with blind faith. If by faith we mean "complete confidence" then it is fine to use. Faith and truth are not the same.

5. The Dogmas of "Do's and Don'ts"

Most religions around us contain three aspects. Within all religions can be found moral principles, which reflect universal ethic and truth. Religion tells us not to be selfish, do good, not to harm others, not to steal, lie or cheat; common human values that all societies require to some degree in order to continue to exist at all.

Dogmatism is the second aspect of religion under which certain actions as said to be wrong which may not reflect any ethical or moral values, but only the bias of a particular belief, particularly the belief of the founder or few followers of the founder. For example, if a religion tells us that it is a sin not to perform certain rituals, or only the book of a particular religion has the so-called revelation of God is not a statement of truth but purely a belief, which cannot but lead us to ignorance. The dogma may even tell us that if we did not follow the scriptures or a prophet, one has to go to a place called hell after death and has to suffer eternal punishment. Based on the ethics, beliefs, experiences and the dogma, each such "institutionalized system" or religion introduces of rituals and practices. It may be simply praying in a church, performing "namaj" or doing meditation. Sometimes the rituals may have good value and sometimes meaningless.

Religions are said to mix the nectar of ethics with the poison of exclusive beliefs. They add hundreds of do's and don'ts, and bar logical or rational questioning. These dogmas create disharmony through both the "believers" and the "non-believers". The believers avoid logic and the non-believers stamp the believers as outdated or unscientific or even fanatics. Do we really need such religions? Should we discard religion altogether and follow secular and universal ethics only?

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

souroSummer3

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
Do you believe in "paranormal things"?

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Author: SolidSnake   Replies: 71   Views: 4305

SolidSnake 71 4305 17 September 2010 at 1:42am by _Angie_
Do you believe in fairytales?

2

Author: shalini1323   Replies: 11   Views: 851

shalini1323 11 851 27 April 2010 at 11:41pm by -Believe-
Do you believe in second chances?

2 3

Author: ..RamKiJanaki..   Replies: 22   Views: 2282

..RamKiJanaki.. 22 2282 30 September 2009 at 10:24am by _Angie_
Do you believe in ghost ?

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13 14

Author: _rajnish_   Replies: 104   Views: 4881

_rajnish_ 104 4881 25 September 2009 at 1:50am by Summer3
Do you Believe in GOD?

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 24 25

Author: amrit23   Replies: 192   Views: 8881

amrit23 192 8881 13 September 2009 at 4:35am by iTangled_25

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Debate Mansion Topic Index

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index