New User? Register Now
zorrro
Goldie
Joined: 29 July 2008
Posts: 1701
The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:
Summer3,
cyrax
Senior Member
Joined: 11 June 2011
Posts: 214
end of discussion! The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:
Summer3,
fantasy_evil96
Newbie
Joined: 14 August 2011
Posts: 27
The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:
Summer3,
fantasy_evil96
Newbie
Joined: 14 August 2011
Posts: 27
The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:
Summer3,
Summer3
IF-Stunnerz
Joined: 24 September 2007
Posts: 43958
A High Court suit is set to be a test case for whether gifts in cash and kind are returnable after a romantic relationship hits the rocks.
The suit in question involves gifts ranging from sparkly baubles and tech toys to condominium deposit payments and even investments in the production of music videos.
Widower Chan Kok Sang, an accountant in his 60s, reckons he must have spent about $400,000 on divorcee Caroline Tong during their courtship, in the belief that she would marry him.
Amount he spent on her
TOTAL: $397,182.42
WIDOWER Chan Kok Sang, an accountant in his 60s, courted real estate agent Caroline Tong (left) in style. Now the couple have split up, he is suing her for a sum reflecting the value of the gifts and other expenditures. The following were the items he bought her, and their cost:
Property purchase deposits: $74,095.56 Cost of producing her VCDs: $79,200 Dental charges: $3,000 Money transfers: $11,638.35 Loan for purchase of Mercedes: $21,324.67 Beds and cupboards: $8,367.40 Watches: $34,003.70 Spa treatments: $4,911.80 Notebook, iPad and similar items: $6,686 Louis Vuitton, Burberry and Gucci goods: $21,430.25 Jewellery: $90,688COUNTER-CLAIM
Ms Tong is making a counter-claim for half the proceeds from the sale of a $1.24 million condominium unit in Keppel Bay, a property registered in both their names.
Now that she is not going to do so, he considers what he gave her to be 'friendly loans' which are to be repaid. Ms Tong, a real estate agent in her 40s, denies the claims. Her argument is that the items were unconditional presents given during their relationship.
zorrro
Goldie
Joined: 29 July 2008
Posts: 1701
Summer3
IF-Stunnerz
Joined: 24 September 2007
Posts: 43958
quirkyalone
Newbie
Joined: 12 August 2011
Posts: 11
| Topics | Topic Starter | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Illegal for women to work? | Bartz | 34 | 1937 | 01 October 2010 at 7:41pm By supercool3 |
|
| Are women Funny or Not? | Angel-likeDevil | 39 | 1673 | 11 August 2010 at 9:58am By ruky786 |
|
| Women equal rights vs Women Reservation | Prometeus | 71 | 4561 | 02 September 2009 at 3:33am By angelic_devil |
|
| Why In India People donot understand !! | RAJAYE_HIND | 13 | 835 | 24 September 2008 at 2:13am By ElusiveDevotion |
|
| r women meaner to women? | mkzara | 25 | 2029 | 23 February 2007 at 4:21pm By Morning_Dew |
Be the part of India's biggest discussion portal.
It’s easy to Join and it’s free.
Register now while it’s free!
Already a member? Close this window and log in.
