Posted:
Originally posted by: zorrroSummerbhai are you writing a thesis on women 🤓
😆 but generally humans are a complicated bunch. That is why fights n quarrels never end. Lots of things are beyond our control it seems.
Originally posted by: zorrroSummerbhai are you writing a thesis on women 🤓
Originally posted by: P1nkSee what I've noticed in men is that when they argue they don't think with an open mind but draw conclusions very quickly, why why why???
Originally posted by: P1nkSee what I've noticed in men is that when they argue they don't think with an open mind but draw conclusions very quickly, why why why???
Originally posted by: Summer3
Try sending a bunch of roses to your mum or anyone you love. It makes them so happy.
But yes some women put up a hard exterior at times, but inside they are all soft.
A High Court suit is set to be a test case for whether gifts in cash and kind are returnable after a romantic relationship hits the rocks.
The suit in question involves gifts ranging from sparkly baubles and tech toys to condominium deposit payments and even investments in the production of music videos.
Widower Chan Kok Sang, an accountant in his 60s, reckons he must have spent about $400,000 on divorcee Caroline Tong during their courtship, in the belief that she would marry him.
Amount he spent on her
TOTAL: $397,182.42
WIDOWER Chan Kok Sang, an accountant in his 60s, courted real estate agent Caroline Tong (left) in style. Now the couple have split up, he is suing her for a sum reflecting the value of the gifts and other expenditures. The following were the items he bought her, and their cost:
Property purchase deposits: $74,095.56 Cost of producing her VCDs: $79,200 Dental charges: $3,000 Money transfers: $11,638.35 Loan for purchase of Mercedes: $21,324.67 Beds and cupboards: $8,367.40 Watches: $34,003.70 Spa treatments: $4,911.80 Notebook, iPad and similar items: $6,686 Louis Vuitton, Burberry and Gucci goods: $21,430.25 Jewellery: $90,688COUNTER-CLAIM
Ms Tong is making a counter-claim for half the proceeds from the sale of a $1.24 million condominium unit in Keppel Bay, a property registered in both their names.
Now that she is not going to do so, he considers what he gave her to be 'friendly loans' which are to be repaid. Ms Tong, a real estate agent in her 40s, denies the claims. Her argument is that the items were unconditional presents given during their relationship.
| topics | author | replies | views | reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PardesiBabu | 88 | 8512 |
comment:
p_commentcount