Dwarkadheesh - Bhagwaan Shree Krishna
Dwarkadheesh - Bhagwaan Shree Krishna

India-Forums

   

07/14/2011: Sishupal proposed for Rukmini

.Vrish. Viewbie
.Vrish.
.Vrish.

Joined: 25 October 2008
Posts: 21213

Posted: 14 July 2011 at 11:05pm | IP Logged
Rukmi is in Rukmini's chamber, where the vaid gives her a potion, and tells Rukmi that she will be okay.  Rukmi is happy to hear that.  Then Rukmini recovers and starts muttering Krishna's name, infuriating Rukmi.  He tells her that he was feeling sympathetic towards her, but now he's ashamed to call her his sister.  He leaves, and Rukmini bursts into tears Cry
 
Rukmi is attending to Jarasandha, who asks him why he's worried.  Rukmi tells him about Rukmini's obsession w/ Krishna.  Jarasandha suggests that bringing a new man into her life is a solution, and recommends that Sishupal, the yuvraj of Chedi who he has been raising as an adopted son, would be a fine match for her.  Rukmi is overjoyed @ the idea of having a matrimonial alliance w/ Jarasandha.
 
In Dwarka, Revathy is still crying, when her maids burst in w/ the news that Krishna & Balaram are alive (fortunately, she didn't change into widow attire).  She is overjoyed, and goes to meet them, and welcomes them home.

In another palace, a ruler is drinking, and one of his dwarpals complain about how effete Sishupal is, while the other warns him to hold his tongue, or risk getting executed.  Just then, a messenger arrives, and insists on being allowed in.  Sishupal is furious @ being interrupted, but the messenger apologizes and tells him that Rukmi has come to see him.  Fortunately, Sishupal's anger subsides, and he goes to meet Rukmi.

Rukmi greets him and has a whole array of gifts for him.  Sishupal is pleased, and asks him what's the occasion?  Rukmi tells him how Jarasandha had suggested that he have Sishupal marry his unmatched sister Rukmini.  Sishupal is pleased to accept any proposal of Jarasandha, and accepts.
 
In Dwaraka, Krishna & Balaram are in court, and all the citizens are there to greet them, and give them gifts Confused Ma Thomas arrives, sees Krishna but does not give him the bundle in her hands, and walks out.  One of the courtiers makes a remark about how cheap she is coming there w/o anything for their ruler.  Krishna hears that and goes up to Ma Thomas, and insists that she give him the gift she's brought for him.  He opens it and finds some gur there (the thing they showed was white - maybe there is white gur somewhere, just that I've not heard of it) and eats it, and compliments her highly about it.  He then mischieviously tells Balaram that he took first dibs on it b4 Balaram could finish it. LOL  Balaram smiles.
 
Precap: Rukmi tells Rukmini that her marriage to Sishupala has been fixed.  Rukmini is shocked Shocked


Edited by _Vrish_ - 17 July 2011 at 3:36am

The following 8 member(s) liked the above post:

dwarkadheeshDebipriya-Swetha-vik rockskinny_ranvirbraveheartedlakshmi42Roark

.Vrish. Viewbie
.Vrish.
.Vrish.

Joined: 25 October 2008
Posts: 21213

Posted: 14 July 2011 at 11:18pm | IP Logged

I understand that the serial is introducing characters w/ a drip effect, like Revathy one day, Rukmini another, Rukmi yet another and so on.  However, despite that, I'm not thrilled w/ some of the things they seem to be doing as a result, like showing Balaram as the king of Dwarka - the subjects addressing him as Maharaj & Krishna as Dwarkadheesh.  Neither of them were rulers - Ugrasena was.  Wish they'd have had him from the first episode itself, and introduced Vasudev & Devaki whenever they desired.

And if Balaram is the ruler, how come he doesn't wear a crown?  When in battle, he wears his Trojan helmet, but when he's in court, he just wears a headband? Confused He should be wearing a proper crown, like he normally did, even though he wasn't the ruler.

I thought Sishupal was okay, but despite the remarks of the guards, didn't find him that repulsive.  I hope that when Krishna hears about him and discusses him w/ Balaram, they go over the story of Sishupala's birth, so that the context is there as to why Krishna didn't kill Sishupala until Yudhisthir's Rajasuya yagna.  Right now, the only ones who can follow the serial are those who know Krishna's history in detail, and even they're not appreciating the way some of the things have been twisted.

The following 4 member(s) liked the above post:

Debipriyavik rockslakshmi42bravehearted

dwarkadheesh Newbie
dwarkadheesh
dwarkadheesh

Joined: 06 July 2011
Posts: 13

Posted: 14 July 2011 at 11:50pm | IP Logged
i love this show..dwarkadheesh..!!!!Heart

The following 4 member(s) liked the above post:

vik rockskinny_ranvir.Vrish.lakshmi42

kinny_ranvir Goldie
kinny_ranvir
kinny_ranvir

Joined: 03 September 2009
Posts: 2008

Posted: 15 July 2011 at 4:43am | IP Logged
i loved the episode...it was nice...
lakshmi42 IF-Dazzler
lakshmi42
lakshmi42

Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 2592

Posted: 15 July 2011 at 5:27am | IP Logged
Thanks for the update Vrish.
Krishna or Balram was never the king of Dwaraka or Madhura. But in the mythos they are always referred to as "Maharaj". In AS Ramayan also they used to call Bharat, Lakshman, Shatrughna, Kumbakaran and Vibhishan "Maharaj". I think this is a specialty attributed to the SagarsLOL

The following 4 member(s) liked the above post:

Debipriyavik rocks.Vrish.Roark

.Vrish. Viewbie
.Vrish.
.Vrish.

Joined: 25 October 2008
Posts: 21213

Posted: 15 July 2011 at 5:51am | IP Logged
Lakshmin
 
I understand that, but unlike in situations where Lakshman or Kumbhakarna are just addressed as Maharaj as a honorific, but where it was clear that Rama or Ravan were king, here, they showed Balaram & Krishna both @ the head of the courtroom, where the king usually sits.  No Ugrasena there.  I wouldn't have made the above observations had Ugrasena been seated on the throne, flanked by Balaram & Krishna, and then those 2 being addressed as king.
 
This serial is clearly depicting Balaram as the king of Dwaraka, which he wasn't, and Krishna as the 'godfather' of Dwarka, whatever that was.  Just makes it look rather empty!

The following 4 member(s) liked the above post:

Debipriyavik rockslakshmi42Roark

lakshmi42 IF-Dazzler
lakshmi42
lakshmi42

Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 2592

Posted: 15 July 2011 at 6:56am | IP Logged
Ugresena is not the only one who is missing. Where are others of Krishna's family. As per the show now they are discussing about Krishna's marriage. Isn't it necessary to involve Vasudev-Devaki-rohini in this discussions. The PH made a big fault by not introducing the complete family. Now we can only see the relation between brothers and also between SIL and BIL. The story of Krishna is incomplete without his parents and the PH must give the entry of his parents and grand parents at the earliest. These may be very small mistakes; but these make the  story deviate very much.

The following 4 member(s) liked the above post:

Debipriyavik rocks.Vrish.Roark

vik rocks Goldie
vik rocks
vik rocks

Joined: 19 January 2009
Posts: 2392

Posted: 16 July 2011 at 6:06am | IP Logged
Guyz...either Sagars have forgotten to show Ugrasena, Basudev, Devki & RohiniD'oh or they've still not finalized the actors to play the characters...LOLsorry bad joke! Embarrassed
That's why this show should have started from Kansa's death...I love this show but...something is missingErmm

Thanks for the update!

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Roark

Go to top

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

  • Please login to check your Last 10 Topics posted

Check these Celebrity also

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index