Originally posted by: Anu-Reddy
But the thing is Baji didnt see NS at that place nor N or B have the photo proof to show that NS knew DP and that its NSs house. So in a way its justified that D trashed B-N's talk. Ofcourse D never had this rationale to think thru so what else can we expect from him π
But Nakku SAW him at 3 places - the temple, in the car, and in that house, and she also SAW the pic! So there is no value for the entire argument, based on just Nakku's statement? Will it be valued only if Baaji also re-inforced it? Even in court, one eye witness is more than enough, provided the eye witness is of sound mind. So does Dutta believe Nakku has a psycological problem, and she is simply hallucinating π?! If thats the case, dont you think she should be taken to a psychiatrist, as hallucinating and running behind cars can be dangerous right π?
comment:
p_commentcount