So who is responsible - Page 11

Originally posted by: setfree

They're imagination lead us to fall in love with Maaneet... and now leading us to question 'who is the real potboiler'? 😉

First off 🤗 Where have you been missy? I went to Milton and came back too. But I didn't see you...nor my Thornton 😒

Coming to your topic - I had to watch the scene to comment and I think it is a mix of actors, PH and channel. Personally I think the two can set the screen on fire when they emote in character. To keep the intensity low, they compensate with showing little stuff which puts us off. I couldn't help notice the straight face by GC during the scene. Do you think he is not capable of acting all carried away? I think it is for a purpose. The same happened during RTM...his face had fewer expressions. Imagine - just with DD emoting we felt the chill during RTM...what would happen if GC did the same?

The other thing I've noticed is that GC has a vest in all of the supposedly "hot" scenes - where there is a chance to getting intimate. Whereas he is bare chest in scenes where there is no chance of getting carried away. Don't you think it says something about their intent?

Lastly, everyone knows Maaneet can beat any other couple when it comes to intimate scenes. What they can bring out cannot be even remotely compared to what others can bring out. So the others can afford to show more intimacy because their intensity will be MUCH lower and hence acceptable unlike Maaneet's which will get a notice from the censor board 😆

OK I don't know if I made sense..but please don't kill me.
Edited by dolphinUSA - 12 years ago

@ Dolphin:  Hi ... we haven't interacted before.

So, I'd guess that it's safe to assume then that the channel was indeed at fault.  It was ensuring that it remained on the right side of the law.  It was also saving itself possible destruction of its property were some groups / organisations to take it upon themselves to set upon the office of the channel for daring to cross the bounds of decency.😆

PS: I remember posts on the forum (at the time when Geet was pregnant) about similar protests by certain organisations against the telecast of any physical intimacy between the leads.

@hegdemedha - Hi :)

Well isn't all this assumption on our part. Is there a way for us to find out for a fact? LOL I don't think we will ever get to the bottom of this because everyone likes to play the blame game :D

Dolph: 🤗🤗🤗 Edited by -pixie- - 12 years ago

@Aarya: Switching off brains, eh? If only the brain came with a switch!

Mera wala blue 😳

Originally posted by: -pixie-

Dolph: 🤗🤗🤗

I know...Its been way too long! No Thornton in Milton? Nahiii...Yeh sunne se pehle mere mere kan phat kyun nahi gaye 😭😭😭

Nahiii keh do ki yeh jhoot hai💔

Medha/Doph: Why would the groups attack only Geet and not any of the other shows that air on the chanel? Any special reason why Geet is receiving such "special" treatment?
Errr because it's the most popular and loved show? Or maybe because it started off on a strong message and trailed off into crap? Maybe because they can handle targeting only 1 show at a time? Because only these leads can set the screen of fire? I don't know. I'm only throwing answers in the air. Catch at least one if not all...LOL

Dolph: No comments on leads acting capabilities in such scenes 😆 and the motivation driving such (non-acting) choices.
No no...I wanna know now😛

I am a very non-violent person, why would I kill you?
Thank God for that 😃

P.S. - I'm writing a new story. I'll PM you the link if you care to read.

Could someone plz tell me what PH stands for.😳

@ Mrinalini

PH = production house

Originally posted by: hegdemedha

@ Mrinalini

PH = production house