Debate Mansion

India-Forums

   
Debate Mansion
Debate Mansion

Invasion of Privacy? Ref: Pg 18 (Page 13)

-Aarya- IF-Dazzler
-Aarya-
-Aarya-

Joined: 02 November 2010
Posts: 2702

Posted: 15 May 2011 at 6:22pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by blue-ice

Originally posted by night13



The paparazzi are being compared to the burglars...<lol>... I would have to say that the paparazzi prevent the burglaries! LOL


lol...y did u like my post if you don't agree with it...LOL

Coming to the comparison...yes I compared Paparazzi to burglars...what do the burglars do...they take away something that is yours ...
The paparazzi ...do the same thing...they take away a private moment from the celebrity...that the celebrity did not intend to give them...


I totally agree that they take pics because the demand is there...that doesn't mean that they are not responsible for what they do...


Just because I may not agree with you, does not mean I can not like your post..can I?... :)

The comparison between the paparazzi to burglars can not be the same, as they are not responsible for any lost goods.  Is stealing someone's privacy vs invading privacy fall under the same category? 


The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

blue-ice.

blue-ice. IF-Addictz
blue-ice.
blue-ice.

Joined: 04 March 2009
Posts: 54326

Posted: 15 May 2011 at 6:22pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by monar


lol till u are comparing two for snatching the privacy I am with you..


I am sure that the privacy is more valuable to these celebrities than diamonds and the paparazzi rob them of it...LOLjust because u can't put a value on privacy doesn't mean that it can't be robbed...

monar IF-Sizzlerz
monar
monar

Joined: 09 March 2010
Posts: 10715

Posted: 15 May 2011 at 6:24pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by blue-ice

Originally posted by monar


lol till u are comparing two for snatching the privacy I am with you..


I am sure that the privacy is more valuable to these celebrities than diamonds and the paparazzi rob them of it...LOLjust because u can't put a value on privacy doesn't mean that it can't be robbed...



ah! if privacy is that imp for these "celebs" than they wouldnt be a celeb.. cummon you want to be in Sky as well on earth at the same time .. not possible...
blue-ice. IF-Addictz
blue-ice.
blue-ice.

Joined: 04 March 2009
Posts: 54326

Posted: 15 May 2011 at 6:25pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by night13

Originally posted by blue-ice

Originally posted by night13



The paparazzi are being compared to the burglars...<lol>... I would have to say that the paparazzi prevent the burglaries! LOL


lol...y did u like my post if you don't agree with it...LOL

Coming to the comparison...yes I compared Paparazzi to burglars...what do the burglars do...they take away something that is yours ...
The paparazzi ...do the same thing...they take away a private moment from the celebrity...that the celebrity did not intend to give them...


I totally agree that they take pics because the demand is there...that doesn't mean that they are not responsible for what they do...


Just because I may not agree with you, does not mean I can not like your post..can I?... :)

The comparison between the paparazzi to burglars can not be the same, as they are not responsible for any lost goods.  Is stealing someone's privacy vs invading privacy fall under the same category? 




What do the burglars do with stolen goods...sell them somewhere for money...don't the paparazzi do the same thing...they steal and they sell the goods...

u r more tham welcome to like my posts..LOL

return_to_hades IF-Sizzlerz
return_to_hades
return_to_hades

Joined: 18 January 2006
Posts: 24277

Posted: 15 May 2011 at 6:29pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by monar

we are moving in a circle.. ain't we? Ermm

Paparazzi won't take private moment from "common men" but "public figures" remove public from there and they are no more interested. Where as Burglars are more human when it comes to prey upon, they don't bother about your socio economical status.



Also candid photography in public places is perfectly legal. People cannot expect privacy unless they are on private property. It becomes hard to draw legal lines on public photography. What next, getting sued because another family accidentally appears in our Disney pictures?

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

monar

-Aarya- IF-Dazzler
-Aarya-
-Aarya-

Joined: 02 November 2010
Posts: 2702

Posted: 15 May 2011 at 6:30pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by blue-ice

Originally posted by night13

Originally posted by blue-ice

Originally posted by night13



The paparazzi are being compared to the burglars...<lol>... I would have to say that the paparazzi prevent the burglaries! LOL


lol...y did u like my post if you don't agree with it...LOL

Coming to the comparison...yes I compared Paparazzi to burglars...what do the burglars do...they take away something that is yours ...
The paparazzi ...do the same thing...they take away a private moment from the celebrity...that the celebrity did not intend to give them...


I totally agree that they take pics because the demand is there...that doesn't mean that they are not responsible for what they do...


Just because I may not agree with you, does not mean I can not like your post..can I?... :)

The comparison between the paparazzi to burglars can not be the same, as they are not responsible for any lost goods.  Is stealing someone's privacy vs invading privacy fall under the same category? 




What do the burglars do with stolen goods...sell them somewhere for money...don't the paparazzi do the same thing...they steal and they sell the goods...

u r more tham welcome to like my posts..LOL



You have to blame somebody, and you can't blame the ones who stole, can you, so why not blame the paparazzi who may have taken the pictures of the burglars... LOL

How do you define goods?

blue-ice. IF-Addictz
blue-ice.
blue-ice.

Joined: 04 March 2009
Posts: 54326

Posted: 15 May 2011 at 6:30pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by monar

Originally posted by blue-ice

Originally posted by monar


lol till u are comparing two for snatching the privacy I am with you..


I am sure that the privacy is more valuable to these celebrities than diamonds and the paparazzi rob them of it...LOLjust because u can't put a value on privacy doesn't mean that it can't be robbed...



ah! if privacy is that imp for these "celebs" than they wouldnt be a celeb.. cummon you want to be in Sky as well on earth at the same time .. not possible...


OK so if its not important to them then it deserves to be stolen...stealing cannot be justified under any circumstances...I am talking about principles here...stealing is wrong period...I don't have an iota of sympathy for the celebrities or the paparazzi...LOL..
return_to_hades IF-Sizzlerz
return_to_hades
return_to_hades

Joined: 18 January 2006
Posts: 24277

Posted: 15 May 2011 at 6:37pm | IP Logged
How can we compare something ambiguous and abstract like privacy with something concrete and material like hard goods? How can we determine "crimes" based on privacy when the very notion of privacy can be subjective?

Paparazzi can be unethical and questionable, but its odd comparing paparazzi to burglary. The only time paparazzi is crime when it amounts to stalking or invading "privacy" in "private property".

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
Aryan invasion theory - why they faked it

2

Author: saturn001   Replies: 10   Views: 2364

saturn001 10 2364 27 September 2012 at 11:09am by The-Voice
Aryan invasion theory

Author: mijanur   Replies: 2   Views: 505

mijanur 2 505 25 December 2011 at 5:36pm by Summer3
Interference and Privacy

2 3

Author: -MOTHER-   Replies: 19   Views: 2218

-MOTHER- 19 2218 20 December 2010 at 10:47pm by -Believe-
Is invasion good for a nation?

2

Author: Dazlingflower   Replies: 11   Views: 1113

Dazlingflower 11 1113 09 February 2007 at 9:50pm by Singh23
Invasion of Privacy??

Author: MonicA#1Actress   Replies: 6   Views: 848

MonicA#1Actress 6 848 02 August 2006 at 7:40pm by usachick821

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Debate Mansion Topic Index

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index