Mythological Masti


Mythological Masti
Mythological Masti

|| Mythological Masti :: Doubts & Discussions || (Page 4)

.Vrish. Viewbie

Joined: 25 October 2008
Posts: 26250

Posted: 02 May 2011 at 11:36pm | IP Logged

Content Removed

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:


jaisiyaram Groupbie

Joined: 26 April 2011
Posts: 106

Posted: 03 May 2011 at 7:07am | IP Logged
Originally posted by _Vrish_

Originally posted by JanakiRaghunath

^ Yeah, I also like Vaman avatar. Bali was not completely innocent and he was out to get the throne of Indra so that the Danavas could rule the Devas, which would eventually result in Adharma ruling Dharma. Vishnu could never let that happen, so I can see complete justification in Vaman Avatar.
It is Parashuram's avatar in which I cannot see justification, and I still find it hard to believe Vishnu could have slaughtered innocent humans, esp since Ram and Krishna avatars were all about the protection of innocent beings. It doesn't make sense.

Actually, no!  There was nothing adharm about Bali - he got his culture from Prahlad/Virochan.  The reason his war against Indra was started was not his ambitions, but rather b'cos Indra killed Virochan out of jealousy that Vishnu was happy w/ Virochan's behavior, and to make things worse, Indra even desecrated Virochan's body so that it couldn't get a proper cremation.  This is what enraged Bali and took him to war.  Don't conflate Devas == Dharm, and Asuras == Adharm, there were virtuous asuras like Prahlad, Virochan, Bali, Vibheeshan, while there were a lot of vile things Indra did, like hide Raja Sagar's horse in pataal near the ashram of Rishi Kapila, and cause the death of Sagar's 60,000 sons.  Or Indra's affair w/ Ahalya - in fact, that was the reason he lost his powers when it came to fighting Ravan and Indrajit.

In fact, here, Vishnu too was displeased w/ Indra, and refused to help him, w/ the result that Bali had no trouble overrunning Devalok.  The reason Vishnu did ultimately intervene was due to Aditi's tapasya - she couldn't bear to see the Devas humiliated, and begged Vishnu to forgive her son and help him.  And this is where I disagree w/ Vishnu - he should have just declined her, and told her that he supports dharm, be it from the devas or the asuras, and right now, the asuras were on the side of dharm.  During his reign, Bali did not persecute the denizens of bhulok like say Hiranyaksha did.  So Vamana avatar was not really needed.

Bali's action can be justified and there must be valid reasons but if he would have proceeded, he must have ended ruling on all three worlds.. which was actually the matter of worry for all lords..

So apart from  vamana avatar, devs had no other options to stop him..

Edited by jaisiyaram - 03 May 2011 at 7:07am

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:


Debipriya Senior Member

Joined: 03 March 2010
Posts: 932

Posted: 03 May 2011 at 7:39am | IP Logged
* About Vamana Avataar- Raja Bali was a noble soul indeed, if compared to Indra. But he had the vice- Pride in him and Shri Hari wanted to cure him from that. That's why He took the Vamana Avtaar. It was necessary to make Bali realise the Benevolence of the Lord, the Emptiness of matrialistic desires (which Bali was aiming at while doing the 'yagna' for the designation of Indra). The Lord knew about the good qualities of Bali and wanted to 'correct' his vision and also to confer 'Devotion' in him. These are the main reasons why Vamana Avataar was necessary.

(Had a nice discussion with Lola regarding this some time back. Here I tried to post from that convo. I guess, she will be able to explain it more in details after her exam. )

* And regarding Buddha- Knowledge (/ Enlightenment), Silence, Peace-- These qualities of The Lord can be found in Gautama Buddha. He is the true embodiment of 'Pragnya'/ True Knowledge. We can find all these traits in Shri Ram and Shri Krishna Avataar as well, but in Gautama Buddha these characteristics were evident throughout his whole life. 

In the same way, Anger is another quality of the Lord, which can be found in Parashuram, as I have mentioned in my earlier posts. 

* We should remember that ALL the 'qualities' in their 'Pure Form' are a part of Shri Hari. So the characteristics ('gunavali') of any avataar can be directly linked to the Lord, if we try to relate the Pure Quality ( independent of the person/ being, it has expressed itself) with the Lord.

The following 6 member(s) liked the above post:


.Vrish. Viewbie

Joined: 25 October 2008
Posts: 26250

Posted: 03 May 2011 at 1:24pm | IP Logged

This is a better justification of the Vamana avatar than the other ones - be it Aditi's tapasya to Vishnu, or Indra approaching him for support.

The following 5 member(s) liked the above post:


..RamKiJanaki.. IF-Addictz

Joined: 20 August 2008
Posts: 59743

Posted: 03 May 2011 at 2:16pm | IP Logged

Content Removed

The following 6 member(s) liked the above post:


MagadhSundari IF-Rockerz

Joined: 03 November 2008
Posts: 8313

Posted: 03 May 2011 at 6:12pm | IP Logged
As far as Parshuram and Vaaman (but more so Vaaman), I think there's definitely scope for threads of their own because we're already seeing multiple possible answers as to what was the purpose for their incarnations, so it would make for a nice possibly long debate. Unless... everyone feels like it's all sorted out already and I'm just late? Either way I don't have much to add as far as Parshuram is concerned because his was a one-track avtaar, one purpose to fulfill and it had nothing to do with setting a good example for the world so virtue need not be expected from him. But Vaaman, I would like to discuss in more detail because Raja Bali is one of my favorite characters, and like Debipriya mentioned from our earlier conversation, I see his ultimate welfare in what Vaaman did. It is made obvious in the Bhaagvat that between Bali and Indra, Bali was the better guy - he had several opportunities to kill Indra that he did not take up but did not go through with it because he was too honest for that. Then his righteous disagreement with Shukrachaarya before that last yagya... I went through a whole list of evidence on Bali's greatness in the recent poll on "which king you would be", there are several. So I think in doing what he did, Vaamanji rescued him from the trap of materialism and helped him avail of the more permanent rewards of devotion. Indrapad is such an aana-jaana affair, everyone who's had it has fallen over and over again... tricking Ahilya, getting run out of swarg by Asur after Asur (hilarious accounts of this are in the Dheeraj Kumar Om Namah Shivay thread courtesy of Aditi and Neela, for whoever's interested), taking panga with Krishna during the Govardhan and then Paarijaat incidents... it's understandable that God wouldn't want someone who is so virtuous and pure at heart to be tainted by Indrapad and go through all of that.

Ok so all of that was not really doubts&discussions thread material, it was definitely an example of what could use its own thread Ermm Sorry guys!

As far as Lakshman/Balram as Sheshnaag or Vishnu, many puraans refer to Sheshji as an expansion of Vishnu so I guess that makes them kinda interchangeable.

A question of my own - anybody know the source of the story we get in ASR, when Shri Ram enters Mata Kaikeyi's chamber first upon returning to Ayodhya and gives everyone a big surprise by revealing that her hand in his exile was really all for the best? He mentions that during her youth, her dad's kingdom was tormented by Ravan's grandfather Sumaali and his demonic associates, and she made a vow that she would somehow or the other cause his downfall. Something like that. I really liked that revelation because of the redemptive aspect of it, very comforting thought.

The following 7 member(s) liked the above post:


visrom IF-Stunnerz

Joined: 26 November 2009
Posts: 31307

Posted: 03 May 2011 at 7:28pm | IP Logged
Lola, even if Kaikeyi had not made any vow, the thought that Kaikeyi indirectly caused Ravan's destruction is anyway comforting.
I was mentioning this in the RS Ramayan thread, where Lakshman tells Ram that he was feeling guilty about having left Seeta alone in the forest and because that had caused the war and destruction, to which Ram says that no one is responsible for what happens in this world. It's all because of fate. Ravan had to be killed, so Ravan's destiny made for itself a path. Kaikeyi's momentary wickedness was because of fate. She regretted her actions and asked Ram for forgiveness. Ram had anyway never held any grudge against her. Kaikeyi's past life...her father's fight with Ravan(as you mention above), Dasharath making Kaikeyi his charioteer, Dasharath granting boons to Kaikeyi are all created by Ravan's ultimate destiny.

The following 6 member(s) liked the above post:


MagadhSundari IF-Rockerz

Joined: 03 November 2008
Posts: 8313

Posted: 03 May 2011 at 7:46pm | IP Logged
agreed Vis, especially in the context of the scene you posted at the other thread (will join you there in a bit!). but not everyone shares that outlook, and when taking it as an ordinary narrative and oversimplifying all these complex moves of "vidhi ka vidhaan", they still tag Kaikeyi as the "vamp" and Vibhishan as the "traitor" and so on... then these kinds of stories are a great for maintaining that level of respect that all the characters deserve for having been a part of the divine plan.

The following 4 member(s) liked the above post:


Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
Mythological Shows - Suggestions / Help Desk

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 21 22

Author: ...PARiNA...   Replies: 173   Views: 15547

...PARiNA... 173 15547 26 May 2017 at 7:54pm by .anishaa.
\|/ Mythological Masti Creation Gallery #8 \|/

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 149 150

Author: ..RamKiJanaki..   Replies: 1197   Views: 42120

..RamKiJanaki.. 1197 42120 03 December 2016 at 8:23am by ..RamKiJanaki..
Mythological Prompts/Drabbles


Author: KrishnaPriyaa   Replies: 12   Views: 612

KrishnaPriyaa 12 612 08 March 2016 at 10:21am by KrishnaPriyaa
Doubts, and more doubts...

Author: Surya_krsnbhakt   Replies: 6   Views: 545

Surya_krsnbhakt 6 545 29 April 2014 at 3:38am by sherlock
MYSTICAL Masti instead of Mythological Masti

2 3

Author: vedantka   Replies: 18   Views: 2691

vedantka 18 2691 20 January 2012 at 9:35pm by vedantka

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels

Mythological Masti Topic Index

Check these Celebrity also

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index