Page
of
1Originally posted by: Neetu_PB_lovermay be she is great......but she has became repetitve..same expressions same gussa....and if someone ask me to compare both the artists i will go for ULKA why??becoz she portrayed the soft side of the rani as well...watch as she excels so brilliant between the adult actors when she became jhansi ki rani......wow i miss those episodes...
now its just monotonous.....krithika may be good...but she hasn't shown much colors of the character..and also i m comparing ulka with krithika......becoz krithika was termed 'better' than ULKA....but today ULKA is far far better....
I think we are wrong in comparing the two. Ulka played the role in a phase when Queen of Jahnsi's life was not so turmoiled and britishers were not so powerful....however as a grown up with no support system and jhansi being taken away, the queen is left to struggle 24*7...so where is the scope of varitey......we are now watching the period which was full of struggles....she has to take an agressive stance.
Originally posted by: shalgoI think we are wrong in comparing the two. Ulka played the role in a phase when Queen of Jahnsi's life was not so turmoiled and britishers were not so powerful....however as a grown up with no support system and jhansi being taken away, the queen is left to struggle 24*7...so where is the scope of varitey......we are now watching the period which was full of struggles....she has to take an agressive stance.
True this period is full of struggle and pressure so its natural for her to get angry.Originally posted by: shalgo
I think we are wrong in comparing the two. Ulka played the role in a phase when Queen of Jahnsi's life was not so turmoiled and britishers were not so powerful....however as a grown up with no support system and jhansi being taken away, the queen is left to struggle 24*7...so where is the scope of varitey......we are now watching the period which was full of struggles....she has to take an agressive stance.
comment:
p_commentcount