It must be in thing to detect 'manipulation', especially clever to sniff it into suspiciously 'godly' people. So let me try to joint the trend and savour some 'intellectual' satisfaction...Archana is 'manipulative'. Now where to assort her? The Indian examples of manipulators like Mr. Chanakya of older ages or Dude Gandhi of recent times, this fits somewhat with her 'facade' of well meaning 'attacks', but trouble is we want to class her in 'destructive' negative manipulator class. So let us put her along with foxy Machiavelli...Oh but this again disturbs the rank of original champions. We are yet to pull them out from the victimhood class i.e. Savitaji or plainly forgotten ones like Rasika or Dharmesh. My credibility gets slurred if I fail to reassort those worthy eminences too... O.K . let me try foolish class. But whom should I confer this honour? The character which is actually trying to act smart in vain, or the scriptwriters who are vainly writing foolish smartness?...Forget it all.
Aah, the vain pleasure of sarcasm. Only dissatisfying part here, is not achieving its full potential for branding lame an obvious lame.
On serious note, OSJ your note on Page 5 (in blue) covers all the relevant points straightforward and best summed up in that brilliant retort... "Manufoolative'.👏
Edited by smrth - 13 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount