Posted: 19 March 2011 at 7:47pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by smartie_pants
Originally posted by ladygaga
^^ How convenient so in the case where Vivek accused Ash of dumping him mercilessley and where he gave clear interviews stating that Ash used him and made him do that press conference.. there the evidence is not concrete enough... but whereas there is no record of the fact that Rani did not inform Ash about the movie.. there there is concrete evidence..?? How do we know what was the equation between rani and ash when the whole thing happened.. actresses proclaim their friendships easily in bollywood.. and then things turn bitter betweeen them.. you can't keep track.. in rani and ash's friendship case nobody knew what happened... but Vivek has given clear interviews where he said that he felt used by Miss rai.. why ignore that poor guy's words??
as far as i remember, vivek retracted those statements he said abt ash and salman...his infamous press conference statements were later justified by him on Star news to be " an immature step of a 24 year old boy."...he was clearly making his statements out of spite during that time, and not with a sane mind, and he himself said tht on several occasions after the fiasco had died down.
edit: furthermore, ash never said in public that her and vivek were dating...it was vivek who kept proclaiming so...i can see why that would irk her, because there were never any feelings from her side...so i dunt get how he was "mercilessly" dumped...she acknowledges he was with her during her toughest times, but does tht mean she also has to take all his nonsense abt them being a couple, even when there was nothing from her side? she had rightfully called him immature at tht point of time, in public..to which he reacted disgracefully.
Ash, on the other hand, chose not to speak abt rani at all...shes not badmouthing her, or bringing her down in public...if that incident made her feel uncomfortable abt her relationship with rani, and if she decided to cut it off, its her personal choice, which we should respect. Is that purposefully harming rani or her career in any way?? nope...its her space, so we should let her be...
The reasons for her behaving coldly towards rani and their friendship not sustaining, have been analysed several times in several different magazines...therz no smoke without fire...there must be some truth in them, if not all...and according to those sources, i feel ash did nothing wrong.
This has to be the biggest joke ever...
So the whole Vivek-Ash affair was a one sided love story acc to you?? Yea it is a good excuse and a defense.. after you use a guy and then dump him.. just say you never loved him... hahaha.. Well there is no point in defending Vivek.. that guy is a clasic example of a loser.. and a person who tried to help someone out.. That is why looking at his condition i say that i am glad that Rani did not even inform Ash... and took that role in chalte chalte.. if you try to help people out.. then you end up like Vivek oberoi.. its better to look out for yourself only.. and not try to be the hero or the heroine.. just mind your own business.. and that is what rani did.. and i don't blame her.
Edited by ladygaga - 19 March 2011 at 7:50pm