1) Ur previous topic was previously closed that's why i'm posting on this topic. u r rite i shud not hav used such debase and vulgar language while answering u.... no matter wat the provocation n 4 that i aplologize wholeheartedly.
2) Ur second contention is that u r aborn lawyer ... well u seem to be labouring under a misapprehension that using 200 words for making a statement which shud take no more than 20 makes a good lawyer. well the most important lawyering skill is keeping it short, sharp, articulate and to the point. Ur posts remind me of a nursery poem " Here we go round the mulberry bush, mulberry bush, bush, mulberry bush" cut the b*** s**t and get to the point.
3) U seem to think that people read ur posts n give u feedback. Wrong notions r very bad for health. Ur posts r like an itch under the skin which u assume will go away if u ignore it for sometime but sometimes u hav no option but to scratch an itch when it gets unbearable..... that is not feedback my dear...!
4) U seem to be continuosly harking back to that TOI article... well i'll tell u a little true story... "Once upon a time 1946 to be exact in the US of A were the presidential elections between Dewey and Truman, as the election results were to be announced after the papers go to the press for printing the night editor of the Tribune the highest grossing daily at that time decided to run a headline ...Dewey defeats Truman... when actually the opposite came to be a true. It was a headline that would haunt him for the rest of his life... there's a famous quote in journalistic circles " A story is as good as it's source..... and .... no source is infallible".... i'm not saying that the story printed by TOI is false but it may not be true either so why don't u save ur ramblings until drashti herself confirms it.
5) And last but not the least if u a scratch an itch for too long that area becomes numb and that that is exactly what has become with ur posts ... so goodbye ang God Bless U....
comment:
p_commentcount