New User? Register Now
Shizaru
Goldie
Joined: 06 September 2005
Posts: 2337
The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:
CallmeMaybe,
Sibar
Newbie
Joined: 10 March 2011
Posts: 7
To me it looks like Mr Athwani and Mr Sahni got more footage. And I think the reason beng they claimed tjhat show change their life. It is utter non sense. If anyone needs a show to change his life, then either one is dumb or is acting. It is goof they don't made to finals. Mr Shinde had no qualtiy though. He got the footage due to his son. Though I personally don't like kids speaking such language with parents, but I guess TV channel promote such begavior to get TRP. I won't like my son to talk to me like this, so why should I like this behavior?
CallmeMaybe
IF-Sizzlerz
Joined: 05 April 2007
Posts: 14308
To me it looks like Mr Athwani and Mr Sahni got more footage. And I think the reason beng they claimed tjhat show change their life. It is utter non sense. If anyone needs a show to change his life, then either one is dumb or is acting. It is goof they don't made to finals. Mr Shinde had no qualtiy though. He got the footage due to his son. Though I personally don't like kids speaking such language with parents, but I guess TV channel promote such begavior to get TRP. I won't like my son to talk to me like this, so why should I like this behavior?
Sibar
Newbie
Joined: 10 March 2011
Posts: 7
This is reality show. The show intially started with the objective of who can manage the house better, and later on they start showing how the absence of wife in life can bring the change. I think this is such a common sense, hence it is very hard to belive that people needed a show to realize this. To me it appear fake. I do realize that star iteself was not clear of format. First they had contestant wives voting out. This was bound to create groupism as this is a natural human tendency. Then in finals they suddenly had eliminated contestant choosing winner. My argument was that why the eliminated contestant were not allowed to vote out in earlier rounds. It is very possible that the contestant were biased and impartial judgement can't be expected. My one cent on this.
The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:
CallmeMaybe,
CallmeMaybe
IF-Sizzlerz
Joined: 05 April 2007
Posts: 14308
This is reality show. The show intially started with the objective of who can manage the house better, and later on they start showing how the absence of wife in life can bring the change. I think this is such a common sense, hence it is very hard to belive that people needed a show to realize this. To me it appear fake. I do realize that star iteself was not clear of format. First they had contestant wives voting out. This was bound to create groupism as this is a natural human tendency. Then in finals they suddenly had eliminated contestant choosing winner. My argument was that why the eliminated contestant were not allowed to vote out in earlier rounds. It is very possible that the contestant were biased and impartial judgement can't be expected. My one cent on this.
Be the part of India's biggest discussion portal.
It’s easy to Join and it’s free.
Register now while it’s free!
Already a member? Close this window and log in.
