Which of the following is damaging 2 Veer's role ? - Page 2

@shivani though 4 me both options r equally damaging!! but i won't blame him 4 2nd thing as he'd earlier told mai not 2 ask him 2 sit in the pooja but its only icchha's stupid family's "bhalai"😡😡 which made him 2 do so & even after sitting in the pooja he asked her 2 sit defying almost all the prsns present there!! and if he'd simply went on wid pooja & didn't ask icchha 2 sit & defend her then hes 2 blame but not now!! but 1st one is more damaging bcoz it was his voulantry action & not forced by icchha or mai etc. though i know every wud-b- father must want 2 do so but not the prsn who never even liked the prsn a bit & rather dispises her 2 the core!!🤢🤢🤢

hmmnmmmmmm...voluntarily touching is seeming more damaging..bottom line this character is damaged...🤔

Originally posted by: ladybird9

hmmnmmmmmm...voluntarily touching is seeming more damaging..bottom line this character is damaged...🤔

Originally posted by: xavivilla

 

agree, that was purely his won choice,...no matter what veer does now..no respect for him 😃

For me option 2 this the most ideotic scene....
two wife, two child, one baap, one pati..........
Like comedy circus.....,

Originally posted by: animalgirl

tum itni sahiii kyun hoo? 😆 why ru soo right 🤣

Originally posted by: varun.tap

For me option 2 this the most ideotic scene....
two wife, two child, one baap, one pati..........
Like comedy circus.....,

Originally posted by: xavivilla

 

agree, that was purely his won choice,...no matter what veer does now..no respect for him 😃

hmmmmm 😔

Originally posted by: ladybird9

hmmmmm 😔

Originally posted by: ladybird9

hmmmmm 😔

I think again one touching moment then veers charactor again repair.......