Posted: 28 January 2011 at 1:44pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Angel-likeDevil
Originally posted by return_to_hades
Whether the asset exposure is a shame or not would have to be determined by the asset value and market outcome of the assets exposure.
I'm curious how many assets are available in the market and what the demand is for such assets. If the demand is high, it might be of value to hoard the assets to increase valuation and expose when asset value is maximized. However, if demand is low and the market is flooded with assets, it would be shameful to expose assets to the market at such low valuation.
It also depends on asset competition and what assets are exposed. As far as I know Rakhi Sawant has assumed monopoly on top level assets. Sheila is not available to trade in the free market and is for display purposes only while Munni is readily available. So at this point in the market I think the highest valued assets would be those that enhance the bottom line. Its a shame if top assets are being exposed.
Chits, I am disappointed with her clothes that look like drapes wrapped around her body WITH a little exposure of the "vital assets"..
But, I liked her apparel today
she looked bootiphul.
accha..I haven't yet watched..will have to keep an eye on her
..I am not impressed with her dresses ..wonder why all the hosts are dressed like this..I liked soumya..miss her