I think Ankita was given preference over Krushna taking into consideration her wildcard performance as well as cumulative performances- cos she had performed very well in the previous weeks and attempted different and difficult dance forms. Yes, she did not get a 30 or even 29, but we have to also remember that judges had already declared by then that they would be stricter with the marking. (This was AFTER Krushna had gone) She got a 27 for doing a classical dance form Kathak, and that in itself speaks about how good she is as a dancer, and Madhuri in particular always appreciated her a lot saying she always sees herself in Ankita. She got 25 for Break even though choreography was all wrong.

Nevertheless, I think it would have been better to bring Ankita back through wildcard and stick to the original format of the show.

@Candy: Krushna did 4 performances-

1.)    Didn't get very great marks- it was too Bollywoodish instead of the Jive it was supposed to be- 22, Anki got 21 ' almost equal.

2.)    The Sci-Fi one- this was nice and he got good marks- 27- even ankita has got 27 once- and Ankita got 27 AFTER judges declared marking would be stricter- that too she got it for a classical kathak dance.

3.)    The lavni- It got 29, but many members said that that the expressions he had during the dance were cheap and not at all graceful, lavni is a graceful dance. Anyhow we'll just focus on marks.

4.)    3 ka tadka: 20 marks.

So its not as if he was ekdum outstanding, yes, he was good and had potential, but Ankita too has done very difficult acts and got good marks for them. You think Krushna was the better dancer that is your opinion, but maybe judges felt she was better- you see na, how Ankita was always complimented by Madhuri since the folk dance round that 'I see myself in you'. Remo also always complimented Anki's dancing, he usually always picked out more on choreography.

Anyway this topic is never ending, and we cannot say anything conclusively- so lets sit back and enjoy the show.