😆here it is:
To prove:slight hope still does exist.
Daya sir got 39 marks but there were contestants who got 46 and 47 and 49(,that is in 40s range.)
Consider the mathematical analysis:
Consider contestant A,B,C.
Suppose contestant A gets 46 marks(out of 60)
Suppose contestant B gets 47 marks
Suppose contestant C gets 49 marks
Since public voting and judges scores are given equal weightage,calculating judges score out of 50:
Daya sir=(39/60)*50=32.5
A=(46/60)*50=38.3
B=(47/60)*50=39.16
C=(49/60)*50=40.83
Now in public voting consider a contestant D who gets the highest votes that is 100% in voting =>50/50
Now if Daya sir gets 45/50(90% in voting,although it may be 48,49 or 50 even,considering value 45 without any loss of generality)
total=77.5
Consider A,B gets 75% in voting~37/50
A's total=75.3 (which is less than 77.5)
B's total=76.16 (which is less than 77.5)
C's total=77.83(greater)
So out of above three contestant even if one gets less votes as compared to Daya sir's total score,this hypothesis will be true.
(no offence meant to any contestant participating in JDJ)