Originally posted by prerna4rishav
Originally posted by axeion
Originally posted by romiosugar
I did not see MB's comment earlier
It's not like she must hide, but I still think she has to hide for the time being; otherwise, she may not get the privileged to have Palak with her permanently while her divorce thingy is ongoing!!! However, still not sure why she is not admitting it, but there got to be some legit reason!!!
So, either she is super pissed at him or she has some other legal reason to hide it
But isn't she being selfish... Raja has equal rights to be with Palak, and even if we keep aside the legal rights... Palak does need her dad. Any other man can't fulfil that void for her...
Ekta how can you say that ? Well in RL, with my mouth and in VL, typing it with my hands Oh wowow I didnt mean physically
First of all, Raja admitted that if it were a BOY child, he would have fought for his custody.. But he doesnt wanna keep a girl child with him.. It's much easier for a Dad to raise a boy, than raising a girl. How much ever we deny, Girls do need a female to raise them. I don't think I need to elaborate on that part. That might have been Raja's intention, and not that he doesn't Like "Girl Child", which is very wrong. So don't twist someone's words the way we want, bcoz we don't know their intentions behind saying that. If he himself admitted that he doesnt wanna keep Palak, where is the argument? He didnt say he doesnt like gal child, but he flatly said, he would have fought for his kid if it were a boy.. No twisting anywhere
Secondly, what kind of upbringing she would have if she lives with such drunkard, wife-beater and abusive disgusting cheap man?
He admitted he had Affairs when he was married
he admitted he suspected his wife's character and was WRONG in that
And he also admitted that he cant live without alcohol There are many more ppl who's parents are alcoholic and who live in pathetic conditions, but not everyone turns to be bad... Palak is already old enough now to understand the diff between good n bad, and moreover, won't it be a learning experience for her and she would value ST more for what she is to her...But if ST restricts her interaction with Raja, maybe Palak grows up to be a resented kid in all likelihood
So what can be the alternate option? Palak can not live with a Mom as well as a Dad.. Because her mom n dad want to live separately.. Any alternate option other than making palak live with this drunkard? And palak really knows the diff btwn good and bad, which is why she chose her mom.. When Shweta said that palak doesnt wanna meet Raja, Palak was sitting right away with her.. And in one vid, Palak was scared to meet Raja
.. Pathetic condition of the kid.. But she has to suffer thanks to Raja
Thirdly, so according to you, all women should keep adjusting with their husbands for their daughters' sake? And remarrying is bad if one has a child? Stop putting words in my mouth!!! I never said that.
But what can be the alternate option ? You want Palak to be with Raja.. So ?
Fourthly, the daughter herself doesnt wanna meet the ugly guy.. Maybe if the mom n dad hadn't involved the kid in their dispute in the first place, things would have been diff. I feel the kids shldn't not suffer bcoz of the husband n wife. And think from a broader perspective, and not just from ST-Raja's view.When a man beats his wife everynight in his bedroom, it can not remain a secret for long..
Parents dont involve Kids.. Kids get involved themselves
Fifthly, Palak would be in peace to live with her Mother rather than watching her mom getting beaten by her dad every night No one wants ST to be with Raja, but Raja does have rights to be with the kid equally... And moreover how he behaves with ST has nothing to do with how he would treat Palak. He loves Palak and can take care of her too. Maybe he returns to the right path if he knows he has a responsible at hand.Raja might treat Palak nicely, but what can be the way for Palak to live with Raja? Unless ST lives with him?
Wow...That's a lengthy post... Read my replies in red.