Posted: 07 January 2011 at 10:04am | IP Logged
Originally posted by arima2010
yes thats what i mentioned, there was no need at all to use those words to depict what happened in the show. it didnt help with what you were pointing out
Sweetheart, that's not what I wrote in my post. It's quite clear you never mentioned it. I am going to explain something to you here - an educational post - to you and the readers. If you accuse someone of rape, or have been raped, there is a way to show that "it' happened, because there are bodily secretions that are left on the and in the person in question. If the girl has not had any relations - which I assumed was the case with Pihu - then her hymen (this is a BIOLOGICAL term) would have been broken. Second, the doctor looks for bodily fluids that the male - and there is a biological term for this but since you're so overly sensitive, I will refrain from using it, for these. Third, the rapist will have his finger nails examined for skin, blood etc that might be left. Fourth, hair - was there any hair of the victim.
Quite clearly, you have NEVER worked with a rape victim NOR have you been involved in a legal case(s) with one. I've had to actually gather legal evidence multiple times for a case and worked with attorney's to prove a rape took place AFTER the fact and without this type of evidence. Methinks here you are making much ado about NOTHING. I suggest you go ahead and looks at newspaper reports, articles and actual legal documents before you jump to such accusations and comments. Moreover, I also believe that from your commments you do not have the experience and knowledge otherwise you would not be making such comments.
Edited by Laila2009 - 07 January 2011 at 10:06am