Doctor should have said....

I think the logic is behind doctor saying we can save only one of them.

She shoul have said we an only save geet if we abort the child. So it is upto maan to keep the baby or save geet.

Then there would be dilemma for maan if he should take the risk of keeping the baby.

What say?

Atleast that makes some sense.....

 

dis makes sense.........

i agree this really makes sense 

i was thinkin da same ur rite aisa hi hoga....... Edited by roseli - 13 years ago

This makes a lot more sense. I think doc made a mistake saying her dialogs properly😆

Originally posted by: maankigeet

I think the logic is behind doctor saying we can save only one of them.

She shoul have said we an only save geet if we abort the child. So it is upto maan to keep the baby or save geet.

Then there would be dilemma for maan if he should take the risk of keeping the baby.

What say?

The doctor's talking about the here and now....if it's up to Maan to decide bt baby and Geet...it's the same thing after all....to keep the baby, Geet has to live.

Your statement implies that Geet will survive long enough to deliver the baby....but  what they showed today was an emergency...it's now or never kind of situation....Geet or the baby ....Maan has to decide now. Either Geet dies or the baby dies.

The implication  made by the doc is that the baby is developed enough to survive without the mother...which brings us back to the blunder....that the baby shown is not more than 4 months old.
Edited by pippa - 13 years ago

exactly that really makes some sense yaar

i think that will happend..bcoz our cvs r not so fool neither we..so they'II never do that BEWKUFI...I hope so...