Originally posted by: damon_biteme
As far as her walking out on the marriage goes well every person has the right to walk out of a marriage when he/she is not happy but what do can u say if you have walked into that mess with your eyes fully open. Was she not aware of the fact that she would be unhappy there. Was she unaware the nature of the Thakurs. Did anyone decieve her into the alliance. So why she acting as a martyr. How can that 'I AM ALWAYS CORRECT' Pratigya convincing others that it was a mistake and we should forgive her. Mistakes are done unknowningly what Aarushi did was scheming. She signed up for this marraige intentionally with a ploy to make Prat's life miserable so her whole act is more than a mistake. She cut her nose to spite her face and I am sorry to say such people have to pay a price for that.
Damon (strange to call you damon now I was used to KC 😛), you have brought up the point which I wanted to make.
Some forum members have said that a woman should have the right to walk out if she's unhappy. I agree to some extents. If the girl marries with the full intention of honoring her marriage, give it a chance and if unfortunately despite all her efforts it doesn't work then yes I agree she can seek divorce.
Lekin IMO Aarushi's case is different. Aarushi walked into this alliance with no intention whatsoever of honoring it. She did it simply to SPITE her sis as Kools said. She took the institution of marriage as her playground and THAT I don't agree with. Marriage should not become a child's play.
So Aarushi going scot free (as the new article seems to imply) is completely unacceptable to me.
Shakti has a point: whether she realised her 'mistake' or not she has to live with her decision. If she ends up being forced to return in TN as Shakti's wife I won't feel sorry for her. Now maybe it's not the best solution and I personally would want her to be sentenced with jail but either way I want her to be punished and I think she fully deserves it.
@YM di - concerning your position that YKW didn't deprive S of consummation of their marriage (purposely), I respectfully disagree. Yes the first night if S had not been drunk then they would have had their SR but simply because teeny twit, foolish as she is, didn't think of any way of escape but certainly not because she wanted it. Then there has been many occasions where she has actively done her max to prevent any kind of physical relationship between them. So IMO she never had any intention of fulfilling her marital duties -- she never was comitted to this marriage.
comment:
p_commentcount