Debate Mansion

India-Forums

   
Debate Mansion
Debate Mansion

moral values- irrelavant today? (Page 4)

-Believe- IF-Stunnerz
-Believe-
-Believe-

Joined: 03 December 2005
Posts: 25721

Posted: 01 December 2010 at 12:41am | IP Logged
Originally posted by blue-ice

Originally posted by Believe

Originally posted by PhoeniXof_Hades

Define "morality" and "moral values" first, and then we can continue the discussion from there. Do you consider morality to be stringent and absolute or do you feel there is room for change depending on the time and context? Do you equate tradition with goodness and morality?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Morality is concerned with ideals... how you should be, what you should be. Therefore, I think morality is basically condemning...every morality creates hypocrisy..... It will do so inevitably. Hypocrisy will remain with morality..... It is part of it  the shadow...for eg...Have you observed the fact that in your bathroom you become more childish...Sometimes you can show your tongue to yourself in the mirror, or you can make faces, or you can hum a tune, sing a song, or you can even have a little dance in the bathroom. Bt while you are dancing or showing your tongue in the mirror, if you becom aware tht ur sis/bro/kid is looking through the keyhole, you change immediate change! The old face comes back...So I think moral person is not an individual becos he is divided, moral person has a personality bt no individuality..... Personality means persona, mask. And he/she has many personalities, not only one ...becos he/she has to have many personalities around him..... In different situations, different personalities are needed...and morality is a social phenomenon... society needs it becos society consists of millions of people..so we all follow differnt ideas / moralities/masks in our life...sub chaltha hey boss!!!Smile



@POH....morality is something that u have to decide for urself......it will depend on different factors...no one can define morality for u......my set of morals will be different from you...that soesn't mean that either one of us is immoral..its just that we believe in different things.....and no...nothing is absolute in this world .....it all depends on ur perspective.......and u don't have to follow what u think is not right.....no one can force u to adhere to a particular set of morals because there is not a set of morals that is universal and holds true for everyone....
@ Vinu....I think u are confusing morals with tradition and human nature.......we do a lot of things out of peer/society pressure.........for e.g..touching the feet of ur elders is an old Indian tradition.....some follow it some do not...those who follow it ..if they just do it for name sakes then they can be called hypocrites.........if u don't like it then don't do it.......so touching the feet is a tradition but respecting ur elders is a moral value ....you are not bound to follow either if u don't think they are right.....Just because someone follows what they feel is right doesn't make them hypocrites..for God's sake...this is a new one I have heard... ---Big smileok ,hope u like to hear new things...
 
When you say somebody is a very moral person, all that you mean is that he follows the rules  laid down by the society in which he lives. Morality became one dimensional.......Ya we have to follow what our culture and society says becouse, Society cannot tolerate somebody who is rebellious, because soceity think he will destroy the whole structure......He may be right...... Athens could not tolerate Socrates, not becos he was wrong .... he was absolutely right .... bt Athens could not tolerate him because if he had been tolerated then the whole structure of the society would have gone, been thrown to the dogs... then the society could not have existed. So Socrates had to be sacrificed to society.....!!!! And Jesus was crucified, not becos whatsoever he was saying was wrong ... never have such true words been asserted on this earth  bt he was sacrificed to the society becos the way he was talking, the way he was behaving, was dangerous to the structure........thats why I said... Morality is concerned with ideals... how you should be, what you should be. Therefore, I think morality is basically condemning...that why I said every morality creates different type of hypocrisy.....and we all know that mind is a creation of the society....... It has been educated different ways!

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

souro

blue-ice. IF-Addictz
blue-ice.
blue-ice.

Joined: 04 March 2009
Posts: 52999

Posted: 01 December 2010 at 12:55am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Believe

Originally posted by blue-ice

Originally posted by Believe

Originally posted by PhoeniXof_Hades

Define "morality" and "moral values" first, and then we can continue the discussion from there. Do you consider morality to be stringent and absolute or do you feel there is room for change depending on the time and context? Do you equate tradition with goodness and morality?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Morality is concerned with ideals... how you should be, what you should be. Therefore, I think morality is basically condemning...every morality creates hypocrisy..... It will do so inevitably. Hypocrisy will remain with morality..... It is part of it  the shadow...for eg...Have you observed the fact that in your bathroom you become more childish...Sometimes you can show your tongue to yourself in the mirror, or you can make faces, or you can hum a tune, sing a song, or you can even have a little dance in the bathroom. Bt while you are dancing or showing your tongue in the mirror, if you becom aware tht ur sis/bro/kid is looking through the keyhole, you change immediate change! The old face comes back...So I think moral person is not an individual becos he is divided, moral person has a personality bt no individuality..... Personality means persona, mask. And he/she has many personalities, not only one ...becos he/she has to have many personalities around him..... In different situations, different personalities are needed...and morality is a social phenomenon... society needs it becos society consists of millions of people..so we all follow differnt ideas / moralities/masks in our life...sub chaltha hey boss!!!Smile



@POH....morality is something that u have to decide for urself......it will depend on different factors...no one can define morality for u......my set of morals will be different from you...that soesn't mean that either one of us is immoral..its just that we believe in different things.....and no...nothing is absolute in this world .....it all depends on ur perspective.......and u don't have to follow what u think is not right.....no one can force u to adhere to a particular set of morals because there is not a set of morals that is universal and holds true for everyone....
@ Vinu....I think u are confusing morals with tradition and human nature.......we do a lot of things out of peer/society pressure.........for e.g..touching the feet of ur elders is an old Indian tradition.....some follow it some do not...those who follow it ..if they just do it for name sakes then they can be called hypocrites.........if u don't like it then don't do it.......so touching the feet is a tradition but respecting ur elders is a moral value ....you are not bound to follow either if u don't think they are right.....Just because someone follows what they feel is right doesn't make them hypocrites..for God's sake...this is a new one I have heard... ---Big smileok ,hope u like to hear new things...
 
When you say somebody is a very moral person, all that you mean is that he follows the rules  laid down by the society in which he lives. Morality became one dimensional.......Ya we have to follow what our culture and society says becouse, Society cannot tolerate somebody who is rebellious, because soceity think he will destroy the whole structure......He may be right...... Athens could not tolerate Socrates, not becos he was wrong .... he was absolutely right .... bt Athens could not tolerate him because if he had been tolerated then the whole structure of the society would have gone, been thrown to the dogs... then the society could not have existed. So Socrates had to be sacrificed to society.....!!!! And Jesus was crucified, not becos whatsoever he was saying was wrong ... never have such true words been asserted on this earth  bt he was sacrificed to the society becos the way he was talking, the way he was behaving, was dangerous to the structure........thats why I said... Morality is concerned with ideals... how you should be, what you should be. Therefore, I think morality is basically condemning...that why I said every morality creates different type of hypocrisy.....and we all know that mind is a creation of the society....... It has been educated different ways!

No This is what u are saying...please see my post again...I said morality is something that u decide for urself....the society doesn't decide it for you...the society gives u traditions,cultures and a set of rules....morals are ur own...u have to decide what u feel is right.............conforming to the society's norms is not morality...some morals do not change with time.....like speaking the truth...will be true in all ages...but the traditions,culture and rules will change with time ...and like I said...u don't have to follow anything ......morality doesn't create hypocrisy....it creates honesty.....

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

souro

-Believe- IF-Stunnerz
-Believe-
-Believe-

Joined: 03 December 2005
Posts: 25721

Posted: 01 December 2010 at 1:14am | IP Logged
Originally posted by blue-ice

No This is what u are saying...please see my post again...I said morality is something that u decide for urself....the society doesn't decide it for you...the society gives u traditions,cultures and a set of rules....morals are ur own...   u have to decide what u feel is right.............conforming to the society's norms is not morality...some morals do not change with time.....like speaking the truth...will be true in all ages...but the traditions,culture and rules will change with time ...and like I said...u don't have to follow anything ......morality doesn't create hypocrisy....it creates honesty.....
 
We were honest, we were moral, we followed right means, we were truthful, and yet we failed. And the other person was dishonest, cunning, insincere, immoral and yet he succeeded.....Now, the whole moral system teaches that truth is going to win, that morality is going to win, that honesty is going to win. Bt in life we see that all the honest people are losing and immoral people are gaining. The cunning, the clever become powerful..... The simple and the innocent are crushed. Our whole value system is at stake....!!!
 
You come into the world just like an actor, comes onto the stage fully prepared. He/she cannot change anything. Once in a while actors can change things, because a drama is a drama....
zorrro IF-Dazzler

Joined: 29 July 2008
Posts: 2702

Posted: 01 December 2010 at 8:27am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.
zorrro IF-Dazzler

Joined: 29 July 2008
Posts: 2702

Posted: 01 December 2010 at 8:35am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.
zorrro IF-Dazzler

Joined: 29 July 2008
Posts: 2702

Posted: 01 December 2010 at 8:50am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.
zorrro IF-Dazzler

Joined: 29 July 2008
Posts: 2702

Posted: 01 December 2010 at 9:02am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.
mr.ass IF-Rockerz
mr.ass
mr.ass

Joined: 27 October 2008
Posts: 9467

Posted: 01 December 2010 at 9:22am | IP Logged
Originally posted by zorrro

Originally posted by old-black-joe

The important aspect is goal. What is our societal goal? What can be done to achieve it?

We have to take into consideration that we are in a diverse society, so the goals of each person are different. People should live and let live, ie, live uninhibited,but at the same time, the general goal should be not to ruin anyone elses life in society.

Old world values are good in theory, they have to be made flexible in todays current world.
Looks like qute a chaotic situation if each of us lives according to individual goals only . There are bound to be frequent clash of interest . There has to be some common ground to avoid constant fights due to it.




@ bold: thats exactly what's happening in the real world, isnt it?

But yes, definitely, a selfish world is as awful as an over diplomatic over caring one.  What I was tryin to say was that people should be ambitious and do what it takes to achieve their goals in life , irrespective of the "old world morals" , but at the same time, don't be evil, as in unethical, or adopt underhanded tricks. However what is unethical or underhanded is subjective, so there will always be some clashes etc, which is exactly what happens. :)

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
In wake of SKS: censorship/moral responsibility?

Author: --arti--   Replies: 9   Views: 1064

--arti-- 9 1064 12 August 2009 at 6:04pm by angelic_devil
Valentine's day - values anything?

2 3 4

Author: raj5000   Replies: 31   Views: 2865

raj5000 31 2865 15 February 2008 at 6:10am by rockstallion
Soldiers killing is moral?

2

Author: raj5000   Replies: 15   Views: 1344

raj5000 15 1344 02 October 2007 at 10:28pm by sareg
Non Vegetarians Animal Activists - Moral?

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14 15

Author: raj5000   Replies: 117   Views: 7823

raj5000 117 7823 06 April 2007 at 6:41pm by raunaq
Moral Inspector of TV?

Author: realitybites   Replies: 8   Views: 894

realitybites 8 894 07 February 2007 at 12:13pm by realitybites

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Debate Mansion Topic Index

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index