Mythological Masti

   

Favorite Pandav from Mahabharat and why??

Poll Question: Who is your favorite Pandav from the Mahabharat??

Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
3 [15.79%]
5 [26.32%]
11 [57.89%]
0 [0.00%]
0 [0.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Post Reply New Post

Page 1 of 5

Page 1
Page   of 5
Page 2 Page 5

...Mina...

IF-Dazzler

...Mina...

Joined: 02 July 2010

Posts: 3400

Posted: 27 November 2010 at 7:51am | IP Logged
My fav has always been Arjun.Day Dreaming

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

DebipriyaShivangBuch..RamKiJanaki..

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "Favorite Pandav from Mahabharat and why??" in Mythological Masti forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

..RamKiJanaki..

IF-Stunnerz

..RamKiJanaki..

Joined: 20 August 2008

Posts: 43270

Posted: 27 November 2010 at 8:57am | IP Logged
I like Dharmaraj, because he is the most misunderstood and criticized of the lot though Krishna always supported him.

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

DebipriyaUrmila11ShivangBuch

ShivangBuch

Goldie

ShivangBuch

Joined: 31 August 2009

Posts: 1032

Posted: 28 November 2010 at 8:02am | IP Logged
My intellectual choice is Yudhisthir. Personal emotional choice is Bheem. And devotional (being Krishna's devotee) choice is Arjun. 

My vote goes to the great BHEEMSEN. Current answer as per my heart. Very very dear to me. Always clear in terms of his thoughts and followed natural instincts like vaanar sena and bhaalu sena to punish the evil. He only was the best husband of Draupadi. Naturally driven to destroy the evil people (Not just Duryodhan for his personal envy but also Jarasandh even). He many times had disagreements with Yudhishthir or even Krishna but we can imagine how much control he must have exercised on himself while almost always obeying them if at all not always. Immense power but always kept under control of dharma and the INSTANT force or instrument used by God to achieve the aim of VINAASHAAY CHA DUSHKRITAAM. And he didn't have to explain him much. Just a hint. Arjun had to be explained Geeta again & again and still he kept on forgetting it and Krishna had to lift the weapon on Bhishma. The impact of Krishna's preaching was shortlived on Arjun. Arjun was innocent (therefore dearest to Krishna) but the character with mind confused and unclear. Yudhishthir was very complex to understand. Bheem was simplest to understand, amazing in deeds, and clear in mind. Also relatively underrated by people I feel in his goodness too (I am mainly influenced by BRC characterization of Bheem rather than SK). Very very noble. Very sacrificing. I don't rate his greatness in Ekchkara nagri to rescue people from Bakasur and then going with Ghatotkach to save a Brahmin family anyway less than DAANVEERTA. Arjun's glory was mainly after the Lakshagruh story. During the early struggle of Pandava's life, they were totally dependent on Bheem's strength.

In summary, almost all characters of Mahabharat are complex to understand (like modern time people) and I therefore like only Ramayan characters who are all simple to understand. Bheem is one of the exceptional cases in Mahabharat.



Edited by ShivangBuch - 28 November 2010 at 8:07am

The following 7 member(s) liked the above post:

DebipriyaUrmila11Vibhishnalola610Mrs.MuffinSobtiThe.Lannister..RamKiJanaki..

Vibhishna

Goldie

Vibhishna

Joined: 08 January 2009

Posts: 1923

Posted: 28 November 2010 at 9:31am | IP Logged
I second ShivangBuch - the characters of Mahabharat are very complex to understand, so is the entire epic. I have not even understood Ramayan fully. I have not even begun to understand the Mahabharat.

As for the Pandavas, my favourite is Bheema. Yudhishtra was the eldest and was respected by the rest of the Pandavas. Arjuna was a favourite of teachers and was close to Sri Krishna. Nakula and Sahadeva were twins and being the youngest were kind of petted by their mother and the other brothers. Also, Bheema was the only one who understood what was happening without a consolation or explanation. Bheema never confronted Sri Krishna when the latter willingly sacrificed the Ghatotkacha to save Arjuna but quietly grieved for his son. Bheema was a true devotee even a better devotee than Arjuna was. For his silent nobility and unwavering faith, I like Bheema the best.

The following 7 member(s) liked the above post:

DebipriyaShivangBuchlola610sam1903Mrs.MuffinSobtiThe.Lannister..RamKiJanaki..

..RamKiJanaki..

IF-Stunnerz

..RamKiJanaki..

Joined: 20 August 2008

Posts: 43270

Posted: 28 November 2010 at 9:43am | IP Logged
Nice replies, guys!Clap
 
You're right that the Mahabharat characters are very hard to understand. Also, they had their faults like humans today. Yudhithir's fault was that one half-lie he told Dronacharya and also his addiction to gambling, Bheema's was quick anger that made him prone ot hasty actions, Arjun's was pride, and Nakul and Sahadev's....well, I don't remember but I do know they had their faults.
 
On the other hand, Ramayan characters were based on idealism. Everything they did was aimed towards perfection and teaching humanity. I think this is why many people prefer Ramayan, because we all desire idealism when living in this Kali Yug where everything and everyone is imperfect already. The ideal characters of Ramayan give us hope and strength to overcome our obstacles. 
 
On the other hand, Mahabharat is great for learning how to achieve our goals in the right manner while at the same time not giving in to others' wills. It teaches us how to deal with an imperfect society, and how to get closer to God despite being surrounded by sinners.
 
So both Ramayan and Mahabharat are best in their own ways, but yes....like the others here, I also prefer the Ramayan a bit more because of the idealism in it.Embarrassed I have always been an idealist since young, and cannot stand imperfection when I see no reason for it....guess that's one of my own biggest imperfection/fault.Blushing
 
When reading fiction these days, western critics criticize a story based on whether the characters have enough faults or not, and I have never understand that because for me, it is the exact opposite.Confused It seems as if western society today actually values character flaws and imperfections, and the ones who are 'ideal' are called 'mary sues' or 'gary sues' or whatnot. For me, my favorite characters are the ones displaying ideal characteristics, and unfortunately, those characters are ones whom  western society today dislikes.LOL It's the Prabhaav of Kali Yug, I suppose.

The following 5 member(s) liked the above post:

DebipriyaShivangBuchlola610sam1903anku-

lola610

Viewbie

lola610

Joined: 03 November 2008

Posts: 7411

Posted: 28 November 2010 at 1:03pm | IP Logged
Cool topic Mina, great thinking Clap I totally agree with the views that Janu, Vibs, and Shivang bhaiya expressed on Mahabharat characters in general... they were all so complex that it's hard to choose between them and have a comprehensive reason for it... Kudos to Janu for putting it sooooo well in that last post, there really is some twisted love of antiheroism that pervades our thinking nowadays and if we're looking for lessons, it helps to have real heroes to learn from instead... hence my attraction towards Ramayan and early Krishna leela characters over the Hastinapur batch Embarrassed

When it comes to the Pandavs, it's a really tough choice for me between Bhim and Arjun. Observing Arjun is a great learning experience, because he's such a dynamic character and makes such progress from beginning to end. But for this poll I chose Bhim, for pretty much the same reasons given by Vibs and Shivang bhaiya. He was always true to himself, and his instincts pretty much always demonstrated that he valued compassion and protection of the weak over his own reputation.

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

DebipriyaShivangBuch..RamKiJanaki..

..RamKiJanaki..

IF-Stunnerz

..RamKiJanaki..

Joined: 20 August 2008

Posts: 43270

Posted: 28 November 2010 at 1:23pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by lola610

Kudos to Janu for putting it sooooo well in that last post, there really is some twisted love of antiheroism that pervades our thinking nowadays and if we're looking for lessons, it helps to have real heroes to learn from instead...
 
I know, I once got into this debate with someone about the characters of Harry Potter, and people were comparing Lily Evans Potter with Hermione Granger, and many people said they preferred Hermione because she actually had flaws unlike what we knew of Lily. Don't get me wrong, I love the character of Hermione as well, but you know from my past PMs that I prefer Lily because of the ideal qualities she exhibited for her family. And I was sitting there wondering how it is a good thing to have imperfections. Isn't the basic message of morality that we should always strive to be the best? And yet in our society, it seems as if people strive to be the worst, and to cover up their actions they put a message across that 'flawed characters' are more enticing than ideal characters.
 
One of my friends told me that the reason may me because people feel like they can relate more with flawed characters, and while that may be true, the main reason I read fiction is to get away from the imperfections of real life and enter a fantasy world where anything can happen, even all good. And also to learn something from the characters in stories and gain a deeper understanding of what it means to strive to be an ideal person. Like you said, we learn from the ideal characters in stories, not the imperfect ones (well I guess we learn from them too since we learn what not to doLOL), so what is the point of reading stories where the characters in it are just like the people in real life? I personally do not find anything to gain from such characters.
 
Then again, I have always been an idealistic person so it is hard for me to understand how some people do not believe in idealism. I personally find it encouraging and inspirational when following the life of an ideal character, because it teaches me how best to change myself for the better and help society, you know? I do not feel the same way for normal, everday flawed characters, other than mere entertainment when reading the story.

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

DebipriyaShivangBuchlola610

.anishaa.

IF-Dazzler

.anishaa.

Joined: 13 August 2010

Posts: 3925

Posted: 28 November 2010 at 4:30pm | IP Logged
Amazing topic!
And great replies everyone!
I originally picked Arjuna because he was Shri Krishna's favorite and I feel most familiar with him, but Bheema came a close second.
After I read Shivang bhaiyya's reply, I turned over to Bheema's side for all the reasons he cited.
But actually, I think it wasn't Arjuna himself who was a confused soul--he was God's instrument and God made him that way so he could give him the Gita pravachan that would ultimately benefit us confused souls.
 

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

ShivangBuch..RamKiJanaki..

Post Reply New Post

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.