Personally, I don't think
there is anything wrong with the rape law. In fact rape is a very serious crime
and I feel that the rape laws in India should be made more stringent. For example
many rapes like marital rape, rape under coercion, statutory rape etc are often
not as well addressed in India as in other countries.
The only changes I would
suggest internationally is set degrees of rape, as they do with murder. For
example gang rape, conventional physical rape should be of the highest degree
and sentenced twenty to life. However, in cases where the victim claims rape
after person does not provide benefits promised and such – the victim may have
been coerced, tricked or blackmailed – but it is an active choice on their part
too.
Unfortunately, too many people
call rape when they change their minds or don't get what they expected. There
is also a growing number of people alleging rape on rich people and celebrities
to make a fast buck. It is really sad when people do this because there are
still hundreds of genuine rape victims out there who are not taken seriously because
people doubt the veracity of rape due to such issue. The laws that really need
revamping are those of perjury and slander. There should be harsher punishments
for people who file false charges of rape up to twenty years of criminal
sentencing. That is because even a rape investigation or alleged rape can
seriously malign a person's reputation. From a certain point of view it also
aids real rapists by diluting rape and increasing doubts against those who file
rape, and hence must be harshly discouraged.
I'm surprised how the criminal
investigation did not find the false allegations of rape in Shiney's case. The
maid was claiming that Shiney was drunk and attacked her. It is only in a case
of recanted consensual sex where rape gets harder to prove/disprove and becomes
highly circumstantial. In an assault case as the maid claims there is always
physical evidence. Usually there is abrasion and/or tearing due to forced entry.
There is bruising, clotting, scratches of some sort due to force used to subdue
victim. DNA from skin cells, body fluids can be found on clothing worn during
the assault. Usually the rapist also has wounds like scratches, bite marks,
pulled hair, bruising, due to the victim fighting back. It is extremely rare
that the victim did not fight back during a sexual assault. The only case when
such evidence is not found is if it was consensual and then person changed
mind, or if it was reported after a certain amount of time.
This case makes me very
curious on the methodology for a rape kit and the criminal process. The first
thing done when a person reports is have a rape kit done for the victim no
matter how long ago the rape was. What did the rape kit on Shiney's maid say?
Was the rape kit consistent with her story?
comment:
p_commentcount