That word - 'Hypocrisy' | 1468412

soapbubble

IF-Dazzler

Joined: 15 October 2005

Posts: 3136

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 7:55am | IP Logged

This is a reaction to SEVERAL posts on this forum by various people.

Mostly the idea that is floating about is this: Johnny-come-lately Aman Mathur has placed a proposal in front of the Saxenas and they are now about to accept him happily where as when our own dear beloved Krishna went to them with the shaadi ka prastav they were rude and turned him down. Therefore the Saxenas, people are saying, are HYPOCRITES.

I justwanted to make the point that in fact this makes them the opposite of hypocrites. Dictionary definitions of hypocricy include:

Hypocrisy is the act of persistently pretending to hold beliefs, opinions, virtues, feelings, qualities, or standards that one does not actually hold.

Hypocrisy is Insincerity by virtue of pretending to have qualities or beliefs that you do not really have.

So, you see, the Saxenas who hold education, refined decent behaviour and middle class morality as their values are NOT being hypocrites in rejecting Krishna and accepting Aman. They are being honest to what they believe their values are.

NOTE: This is a purely academic point that I am making and does not indicate my vitriolic hatred of Krishna or my unthinking insane defence of the Saxenas. I am a viewer who likes Krishna, likes PRatigya, finds the Thakurs entertaining and the Saxenas interesting. Just - it's driving me up the wall to see so many bandy that word about loosely... so Tongue

Bubble

The following 10 member(s) liked the above post:

meerag, tara_211, birju4baby, goham1000, Love_Mehak, HOTHUGZ, ...Binny..., -Antu-_-Aslan-, gees, nisha2010,

nisha2010

IF-Sizzlerz

Joined: 23 May 2010

Posts: 16425

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 7:57am | IP Logged

agree.................. Thumbs Up

gees

IF-Rockerz

Joined: 05 June 2010

Posts: 6064

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 8:09am | IP Logged

Originally posted by soapbubble

This is a reaction to SEVERAL posts on this forum by various people.

Mostly the idea that is floating about is this: Johnny-come-lately Aman Mathur has placed a proposal in front of the Saxenas and they are now about to accept him happily where as when our own dear beloved Krishna went to them with the shaadi ka prastav they were rude and turned him down. Therefore the Saxenas, people are saying, are HYPOCRITES.

I justwanted to make the point that in fact this makes them the opposite of hypocrites. Dictionary definitions of hypocricy include:

Hypocrisy is the act of persistently pretending to hold beliefs, opinions, virtues, feelings, qualities, or standards that one does not actually hold.

Hypocrisy is Insincerity by virtue of pretending to have qualities or beliefs that you do not really have.

So, you see, the Saxenas who hold education, refined decent behaviour and middle class morality as their values are NOT being hypocrites in rejecting Krishna and accepting Aman. They are being honest to what they believe their values are.

NOTE: This is a purely academic point that I am making and does not indicate my vitriolic hatred of Krishna or my unthinking insane defence of the Saxenas. I am a viewer who likes Krishna, likes PRatigya, finds the Thakurs entertaining and the Saxenas interesting. Just - it's driving me up the wall to see so many bandy that word about loosely... so Tongue

Bubble

well said but they r still hypocrites--maybe wid a difference !!! LOL

as you said they r honest to the values they believe they have !!!! that doesnt necesarily mean they hve it as per others judgement! ROFL

Edited by gees - 23 August 2010 at 8:12am

soapbubble

IF-Dazzler

Joined: 15 October 2005

Posts: 3136

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 8:15am | IP Logged

Originally posted by gees

Originally posted by soapbubble

This is a reaction to SEVERAL posts on this forum by various people.

Mostly the idea that is floating about is this: Johnny-come-lately Aman Mathur has placed a proposal in front of the Saxenas and they are now about to accept him happily where as when our own dear beloved Krishna went to them with the shaadi ka prastav they were rude and turned him down. Therefore the Saxenas, people are saying, are HYPOCRITES.

I justwanted to make the point that in fact this makes them the opposite of hypocrites. Dictionary definitions of hypocricy include:

Hypocrisy is the act of persistently pretending to hold beliefs, opinions, virtues, feelings, qualities, or standards that one does not actually hold.

Hypocrisy is Insincerity by virtue of pretending to have qualities or beliefs that you do not really have.

So, you see, the Saxenas who hold education, refined decent behaviour and middle class morality as their values are NOT being hypocrites in rejecting Krishna and accepting Aman. They are being honest to what they believe their values are.

NOTE: This is a purely academic point that I am making and does not indicate my vitriolic hatred of Krishna or my unthinking insane defence of the Saxenas. I am a viewer who likes Krishna, likes PRatigya, finds the Thakurs entertaining and the Saxenas interesting. Just - it's driving me up the wall to see so many bandy that word about loosely... so Tongue

Bubble

well said but they r still hypocrites--maybe wid a difference !!! LOL

as you said they r honest to the values they believe they have !!!! that doesnt necesarily mean they hve it as per others judgement! ROFL

So basically: you don't agree with their values so THEY're hypocrites? LOL

That logic leaks Wink

Bubble

gees

IF-Rockerz

Joined: 05 June 2010

Posts: 6064

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 8:20am | IP Logged

let it leak !! Clap

let it oozz !!!! but they think they hve those values wen they dont -- !!!!! ROFL

Edited by gees - 23 August 2010 at 8:25am

MonyP

IF-Rockerz

Joined: 08 September 2006

Posts: 7494

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 8:35am | IP Logged

Originally posted by gees

Originally posted by soapbubble

This is a reaction to SEVERAL posts on this forum by various people.

Mostly the idea that is floating about is this: Johnny-come-lately Aman Mathur has placed a proposal in front of the Saxenas and they are now about to accept him happily where as when our own dear beloved Krishna went to them with the shaadi ka prastav they were rude and turned him down. Therefore the Saxenas, people are saying, are HYPOCRITES.

I justwanted to make the point that in fact this makes them the opposite of hypocrites. Dictionary definitions of hypocricy include:

Hypocrisy is the act of persistently pretending to hold beliefs, opinions, virtues, feelings, qualities, or standards that one does not actually hold.

Hypocrisy is Insincerity by virtue of pretending to have qualities or beliefs that you do not really have.

So, you see, the Saxenas who hold education, refined decent behaviour and middle class morality as their values are NOT being hypocrites in rejecting Krishna and accepting Aman. They are being honest to what they believe their values are.

NOTE: This is a purely academic point that I am making and does not indicate my vitriolic hatred of Krishna or my unthinking insane defence of the Saxenas. I am a viewer who likes Krishna, likes PRatigya, finds the Thakurs entertaining and the Saxenas interesting. Just - it's driving me up the wall to see so many bandy that word about loosely... so Tongue

Bubble

well said but they r still hypocrites--maybe wid a difference !!! LOL

as you said they r honest to the values they believe they have !!!! that doesnt necesarily mean they hve it as per others judgement! ROFL

You are right !!! and they forgrt those values or whatever it is, very very conveniently and feel proud about it. It's so irritating when they repeat especially Mr sacksena and his laadli beti " ye galat hai. Ye sahi nahi hai. Hum galat nahi hai etc"

.

sorry for butting in, but couldn't stop myself.

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

gees,

HOTHUGZ

IF-Rockerz

Joined: 23 October 2007

Posts: 5449

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 8:37am | IP Logged

Hey Bubble thanks Smile

Some times the hardest things and the right things are the same. Many of us believe that wrongs aren't wrong if it's done by nice people like ourselves but the injury we do and the one we suffer are not weighed in the same scales. Confused

Applies to both Sax and Thakurs -- Is that hypocrisy ? LOL

Edited by SAM2U - 23 August 2010 at 8:41am

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

gees,

gees

IF-Rockerz

Joined: 05 June 2010

Posts: 6064

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 8:38am | IP Logged

Originally posted by SAM2U

Hey Bubble thanks Smile

Some times the hardest things and the right things are the same. Many of us believe that wrongs aren't wrong if it's done by nice people like ourselves but the injury we do and the one we suffer are not weighed in the same scales. Confused

beautifully said Clap

Topics	Topic Starter	Replies	Views	Last Post
Define krishna in one word! :) 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16 17	shumi.	129	3389	02 September 2010 at 8:42am By HOTHUGZ
Aman Mathur in a word 2 3	trina_gautam	16	660	17 August 2010 at 10:28am By aleena1
only 1 word -AWESOME!!	she_ratchet	6	445	03 August 2010 at 1:24pm By Filza.
Krishna in a word	trina_gautam	6	274	01 August 2010 at 6:19pm By kriya_fan
why didn't she utter a single word 2 3	waniya_fatima	19	749	19 July 2010 at 5:27am By waniya_fatima

That word - 'Hypocrisy'

Page 1 of 5

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 7:55am | IP Logged

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 7:57am | IP Logged

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 8:09am | IP Logged

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 8:15am | IP Logged

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 8:20am | IP Logged

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 8:35am | IP Logged

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 8:37am | IP Logged

Posted: 23 August 2010 at 8:38am | IP Logged

Related Topics

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Search

Check these Celebrity also

Join India-forums Today!

Here's why members would love to be a part of India-Forums.com:

Join Us Close