U.S. intelligence after 9/11

Hi all,

Views and comments plz

Edited by Believe - 13 years ago

us people will always have the same intelligence, unfortunately.

Originally posted by: Believe

Hi all,

 

Do you think entire intelligence community, based on faulty premises and unrealistic expectations.!? US keep saying that Saddam Hussein has WMD,he does not have WMD.. or they simply do not know...Now a leaked report from US intelligence says, CIA found no link between Saddam Hussein and AlQaeda and now another leaked intelligence says that war actually produced a new breed of radicals and terrorist.! Do you believe, cos of these type of wrong deeds,world peace improved!!? ....Do you think America's gov't care about peace ?

Views and comments plz

It was the UN officer who claimed that they did not find any WMD. Edited by Summer3 - 13 years ago

The less said about US intelligence the better. They have been less effective in stopping actual terrorists and more effective in harassing civilians. The foreign policy has always been flawed. The US has a policy of intervention and preemptive action which has not been effective. Forget Iraq - US is a country that has had its nose in wars across the world since the world wars (and it had no business in WWI).

I feel that the 'war on terror' is the right idea, but US needs to go back to the drawing board and rethink its execution which has always been flawed.

The US Intelligence is involved only in one thing - singling out and finding ways to exterminate Leaders or regimes that do not serve the interests of its MNCs. 'Nuff said.

first of all terrorists are individuals and not nations so you cant fight terrorism using the armed forces!!! you just make more enemies and terrorists by innocent collateral damage!!!

@ Qwerty- thats not always the case......many a times Terrorism IS funded by the state - the most prominent  example being Pakistan...however, the US got it wrong when they chose Imperialistic hubris over Actual fight- thats why they kept on arming Pak with Missiles and fighter Jets while Bush struck Oil deals with Saudi princes....and meanwhile an Innocent country Iraq fell victim to their Oil Lust.

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

@ Qwerty- thats not always the case......many a times Terrorism IS funded by the state - the most prominent  example being Pakistan...however, the US got it wrong when they chose Imperialistic hubris over Actual fight- thats why they kept on arming Pak with Missiles and fighter Jets while Bush struck Oil deals with Saudi princes....and meanwhile an Innocent country Iraq fell victim to their Oil Lust.

Right you are..

not exactly, quert and krys. Nations include civilians , as well.

Sadly, those civilians think the same about other nations being terrorists. 😆 not just the govt guys or the few actual terrorists.

Originally posted by: old-black-joe

not exactly, quert and krys. Nations include civilians , as well.

Sadly, those civilians think the same about other nations being terrorists. 😆 not just the govt guys or the few actual terrorists.