Kools, I am not saying Manav- Archu are not responsible for the pathetic condition, indeed they are, much much more than Shravani. In fact shravani is not to be blamed here at all.
nor am I justifying that they shud give guilt trips to Shravani. You did not understand my post it seems (or rather I didn't explain it well). I am not saying blaming shravani was right. I was saying that at the end of the day, the conclusion is that the baby holds Manav- Archu from saying no to divorce. Whether Manav wants it for mother or some other reason- I am not even speaking about it. I'm just saying, in the end it is the baby that matters. They all want the baby. And so the line in your commentary 'Archu saying we are divorcing for baby sake' is a big big lie, I don't really agree to it. Here I'm not at all debating on why they want baby- fact is they want baby and for this they are breaking up their marriage.
In fact I don't even view this statement as a guilt trip statement. It was jst a plain fact, bas. Shravani doesn't need to feel guilty at all.Cos shravani cud easily have retorted back- Who told you to divorce for baby? Did I say? No, na? Then what farce is this- trying to be all mahaan.
The statement was a plain fact- We are divorcing cos of baby. Plain and simple. Now baby for whom, for what, all is a different matter.
Just my POV. I don't know if I made myself clear this time.
comment:
p_commentcount