I have always maintained that Ridhima is a character that has been butchered the maximum by the Creatives.. whenever they seemed stuck for an idea, what do they do? 🤪
I have always maintained that Ridhima is a character that has been butchered the maximum by the Creatives.. whenever they seemed stuck for an idea, what do they do? 🤪
I absolutely am in awe of your post, especially the last bit. We indeed are our worst enemies, no doubt there.
Riddhima may probably be the most butchered character on the history of TV, and the chances for the future seems very bleak as well. Right from initial episodes till today's episode, her characterization has never stayed consistent. Her reactions were never sane or genuine, each of her action would simply contradict her previous ones or ideologies. Who are at fault there? Of course the creatives. When all roads seem to be shut, then they pull out the back up plan which is basically to butcher Riddhima's character even further.
I will try to say a few bearing the current track in mind, and lets hope it makes sense. I don't expect it to much, because lets face it, it's DMG we are discussing where nothing was ever relevant to begin with. My concern is that Riddhima is being blamed for moving ahead in life, and not waiting for her saajan back home. Hello there, the same exact could be said for the TV's Romeo Armaan. Why oh why did he desert her in Panchgani, and why oh why did he first prioritize to become a rockstar over his lover. Why is that the woman is always expected to sit back home in the memories of her lover, while the men get to have their fair share of fun with chics at concerts. Not fair, I tell you.
And, folks on this forum are very confused as well in regards to what they want from Riddhima. I unfortunately had read the same post as you did which left me pink as well. How's a woman labeled independent if she decides to become a devdasni (?) and live in a dark room with the support of her memories? That beats me really. Do independent people not move on in lives? Do they not have a right to? Can they not create a second fairytale for themselves? Are they not allowed to eye men anymore? *shock and horror* I am revealed new theories everyday.
The gender bias dripping in every post in order to shield the eternal Armaan is despicable, and amusing as well at the same time.
" read someone saying something about if Ridhima was really independent she would have stayed unmarried with her love memories"---😆😆😆😆As if Armaan is her husband and Ridzie his widow.
Originally posted by: angel_wingsNice post........niway How many times do people actually end up marrying their first love? ......except lucky few...most of us dont.....though its hard to forget ...but we do move on.....There are so many women who have fallen in love before with men who are not their husbands. But now that they are happily married :)
Just to make it clear, I am against forced marriages as well, but with the situation displayed in DMG, it was a forced relationship, but not anymore. Siddhanth had freed Riddhima of all vows except when two beings are in a contract or bond as you say, it's not a piece of cake to walk out from it. Marriage is meant to be worked out, through thick and thin, and when all fails, then any further step is taken. But of course most essentially, the folks involved in the relationship at any cost must be happy and satisfied. In DMG, at the moment, it seems that the two beings were satisfied with the relationship, and wanted to carry it forward...till the blast from the past was re-introduced like no other.
Now my point to make here is that, lets just forget 'societies'. Lets be broad. In the entire world, generally folks move on if their fist love is not fulfilled. Scientifically we human beings have certain desires and wants, thus for that to be fulfilled, we decide the best for our future and weave a practical fairytale once again.
Also if everyone's blast from the past came in front of them, realistically speaking, then there literally be a divorce every hour. CVs have a tuff task at hand; if they are pondering over uniting A-R (I have no issues with that either) then they better do it in a way where the premise of marriage isn't tainted.
comment:
p_commentcount