CASE-'Sr.Inspector Abhijeet' (Page 5)

I don't think that Abhijit was a officer in 1995. He was called by the father of Sunaina, but about his occupation, I don't think he had any. Although in Stolen Dynamite, the precap does say that he has been a valiant officer for many years. But still, I don't think he was an officer.

C'mon yaar...he was Inspector Abhijeet in Stolen Dynamite flashback(1997) where Daya calls him 'Sir' and 'aap'...he would definitely have been a sub-inspector in 1995. Plsread previous page for more explantions about the case.

Edited by visrom - 20 March 2010 at 7:20pm

According to The Case of the Stolen Dynamite, Abhijeet was an Inspector when he lost his memory in April 1997 i.e. 13 years ago not 15 years as stated (by Daya) on Friday's episode. SI Daya used to work under him at the time. He had already received at least one medal and had performed several noteworthy case investigations before his memory loss.

I like visrom's speculations but it would have been nice if they had given an explanation in the episode itself. A single line of explanation would have been enough. They should be more careful about these things.


Edited by Kal El - 20 March 2010 at 7:28pm

This is true...

explanations given by u guys r quite satisfactory...but the most important question was- where does ARVIND come in from?? when was Abhijeet Arvind?/ v never knew dat his name was ever Arvind!!! it was always Abhijeet...even b4 his memory loss!!!

Maybe he was in a secret operation where his name was Arvind.

Exactly, 15 years back Abhi Sir has to be a police officer, as per ACP he was considered one of the best officers in 1997 before his memory loss. It must have taken him atleast 2 years to establish himself. I fail to understand why and what he must be doing in a bar even 15 years ago. Abhi Sir is definitely not one to hand around in a bars and then end up having a fight with someone there. I would like to believe he was there in disguise.

I can still ignore the fact that Abhijit-Arvind mystery wasn't solved, it happened 15 years ago, Abhi Sir does not remember anything, who will give an explanation as to what happened.

But a lot of times certain clues are thrown in, the CID team talks about it a couple of times, gives it importance and then suddenly those clues end up having zero significance. In this case there was a lot of emphasis on - the broken watch, the fact the killer is injured, Abhi Sir calling Paresh, etc. Paresh calling Abhi Sir, I would still understand but Abhi Sir calling Paresh, I don't understand. Leter there is a conversation between Tasha and ACP about Paresh's call-list and there is no mention of this phone call.

The creative team has to be careful and not make such mistakes. After editing the case they have to ensure not leave such loose ends. Apart from this they have to be careful of giving everyone dialogs that are in-character. Half of the Daya Sir's dialogs in the first Daya-Abhi confrontation were out of character. That was not the Daya Sir I have know for years. They know CID repeats are on in full swing, we have sort of lived 12 years of CID again in the past few months. They have to be careful and maintain consistency of the principle characters and their background. Our memories are very sharp and with the re-runs its only got better.


Edited by prabhanarayan - 21 March 2010 at 4:56pm

Maybe they are referring to Abhijit as the thief Paresh.