Originally posted by sagnikasenapati
I totally agree dis time v shud b Dillogical than thinking abt pure logic in the episode...but there were quite a number of things which i didnt undrstand(although for me this episode stands as the best of 2010 or may b the best of its kind)..if somebody could clarify....
1) As far as i remember in the CASE OF STOLE DYNAMITE (1st episode of Abhijeet) he was Abhijeet the inspector even b4 his memory loss...n dat was around 11 yrs bak.
then where does dis Arvind come in from? y was he being referred to as Arvind in yest's episode?? n when he was Arvind he wasnt an Inspector???
so does that mean he changed his name or something in those days to Abhijeet n then joined Police??? n how can some1 who has been a suspect of murder case become a police inspector suddenly?? i didnt get the facts rite or was it scripting mistake??
2) In 1 scene Tasha said dat the last call on Paresh's cell was from Abhijeet... how was dat possible?? there was no mention of dis later on in the show...y wud ABhi call Paresh?? n he never said nething abt it either....
the 3rd doubt was abt the video...but Prabhadi explained dat well enough...
plss clarify some1..
but inspite of all this i loved the episode the most!! i saw it soo many times since yest!!! family getting pised wid me cos day n night m watching the same thing...although i have my maths xam dis monday(class 12 boards!! ISC examinations...)but cant help it...
very xcieds for 26th episode..heard its gonna b very interesting...CID raising its bar higher wid each episode!! A big round of applause for our favourite TEAM...HATS OFF TO THEM!!
About point 1, Stolen Dynamite was in 1999, and the timing of the murder was 1995... when Abhijeet was a junior guy (like our present Vivek) and probably got a tip off about something happening in the hotel and came in disguise....that can be explained easily, as Abhijeet has done too many disguises. The mission was not for Siddharth's murder but a bigger issue, like terrorism etc which couldnt be revealed to the public. It was just a coincidence that Abhijeet was there is disguise and the murder happened and Abhijeet got entagled in this case, just like 'CID undercover', where ACP got arrested. The hotel waiters etc caught Abhijeet as he was there at the murder scene.
Maybe later on, Abhijeet's senior officers covered up for him, as he was a cop and was sent to the hotel in disguise on their orders. At that time maybe the killer just pushed Abhijeet and ran off and Abhijeet made a sketch etc etc and the still police couldn't find him, and the case was dropped.
After that Abhijeet lost his memory, (if you see the stolen dynamite, he says '2 saal pehle', which means memory loss was in 1997) so he couldn't tell the present ACP about this disguise and stuff.
Point 2 : Abhijeet calling Paresh...Abhijeet vanished for sometime after Paresh's murder. He is a CID officer...do you think he would have been lying low? Maybe he dug out the file which Daya got later.He might have read the complete case history and wanted to know something more about the case, so called Paresh. The step father probably heard Paresh talking to Abhijeet, so got scared if Abhijeet would recognise him and killed Paresh before he could meet Abhijeet.
Getting more ideas...you know how court cases drag on for years...the murder happened in 1995...in 1997 the case was still open and in the middle of it, Abhijeet lost his memory. This Purvi's step-father might have been tracking this case very closely(as he was related to the family), and realised that Abhijeet has lost his memory completely, so he would never recognise him.So he might have conviced Purvi's family to close the case since further investigations might have brought the truth out.
I hope this explains it.
Edited by visrom - 20 March 2010 at 7:17pm