Originally posted by: MithiBani
Nazron ka dhokha!! Sounds like a Bollywood movie. 😆I think you are working too hard Angel. Hota hai....but aal izz well. 😛
Originally posted by: MithiBani
Nazron ka dhokha!! Sounds like a Bollywood movie. 😆I think you are working too hard Angel. Hota hai....but aal izz well. 😛
Originally posted by: blue-ice
I am sure he will....he has a hindu wife........gauri once told on koffee with Karan..that there is more of Hindu influence on her kids .....they have both mandir and holy Quoran at home.....SRK has to be tolerant of other religions otherwise all this would not be possible............and to all the people who will come and bash me on this my answer to them in advance is...................WHATEVER... 😆😆
😆
Well Shahrukh was broght up in a Christian school, has a Hindu wife and when he was doing Fauji and Circus, his tenant(Gauri Khan's parents) were Hindu and he has also done so many roles in which he's Hindu, so he is religion-tolerant.
Originally posted by: MithiBani
Yeah I too read that they are Ganpati bhakts. But I doubt he ever will raise his voice for an unfashionable cause like the Kashmiri Pandits. He branded himself as the ambassador of Islam....nothing wrong with that, he is the moderate, sane face of it but I'd like to see the indian in him take up cudgels for causes such as these. If he does, he has a fan for life!! 😛And LOL @ that anticipatory bail!! 😆 😆
Originally posted by: blue-ice
SRK wale topic se bahut lessons learn kiye hain...this is one of them 😆😆
Well, IDK. Maybe he will, maybe he won't. Muslims are only concerned about their own self-interest(as far as religion is concerned), but Hindus for the most aren't. Geez, I really worded this wrong, but I can give a explanation using the example of the relationship of the Danish Jews and Danish Aryans during WW II(Holocaust). Even though the Jews were being captured by the Germans in Denmark, the Danes did not think of the religious aspect, but thought of the Jews as their fellow countrymen. Therefore, they helped them by shipping them to Sweden. Only about 400 Danish Jews were captured by the Nazis as a result. Hopefully you're understanding what I'm saying. So, basically, country comes before religion.Originally posted by: MithiBani
I am sure he is. But will he do what the writer is searching for.......Why nobody, yes, not a single Muslim, comes forward to take up the cause of the exiled and killed and contemptuously marginalized Kauls whereas every Muslim complainant would have essentially a Hindu advocate to take on Hindus as fiercely as he can?
Originally posted by: MithiBani
Yeah, indeed a very sad letter. But I don't think he's venting his anger on just KJo. He's venting it out on the politically correct junta of India..like KJo.. who calls itself secular and yet doesn't see it fit to raise their voices when they see the another religion being persecuted. Like he says, it's just not fashionable enough. Of course what's wrong is wrong but why does one wrong get more attention and the other wrong ignored??
Of course the Govt is to be blamed. But along with it, I blame the media. They just don't highlight their cause and plight enough. Maybe if they were creating havoc and holding the country to ransom, someone would notice. This very media rushes in with hammer and tongs when SS calls SRK unpatriotic and start questioning if that is being doubted coz he's a Muslim or they go into frenzy when a Christian or a Muslim complains of harassment. Yet they remain silent when it's the majority religion. The GOI does not give the Kashmiri Pandits IDP(Internally displaced people) status because that would make them eligible for aid from foreign agencies like red Cross, UNICEF, etc. The Govt is busy appeasing minorities, creating quotas for them rather than bother about the some displaced ppl living in squalid conditions in refugee camps IN Jammu and New Delhi.I too would like an answer to his question....Why nobody, yes, not a single Muslim, comes forward to take up the cause of the exiled and killed and contemptuously marginalized Kauls whereas every Muslim complainant would have essentially a Hindu advocate to take on Hindus as fiercely as he can?
Why??Also why no one, the media, the govt'doesn't talk about the innumerable temples destroyed in Kashmir not just by terrorists but by the common ppl too. Why it is okay to destroy temples but a big hue and cry is raised every time a Masjid or Church is gutted? I am not saying that destroying religious shrines of any religion is right. It is completely, totally and irrevocably wrong but why this soutela attitude towards temples?? Why does the common man have absolutely NO idea of the temples gutted there yet is very knowledgeable of the churches in Orissa or the Babri Masjid or the Golden temple being desecrated?? I'd certainly like answers to these. Here's a list of ruined temples there'''http://www.kashmir-information.com/Atrocities/Temples/index.html. And some YouTube videos...http://thekashmir.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/ruined-temples-of-rainawari-kashmir/. The media does not tell us any of this.Is it because these peaceful ppl don't go about making bombs and blowing up ppl and that's why no one listens to them? I am not against any religion. I just demand equal treatment and sympathy from the Govt and media.
comment:
p_commentcount