Pavitra Rishta

   

Kadoos Manav ya the lovable Manav!!!!! (Page 5)

Post Reply New Post

Page 5 of 5

Page 1 Page 4
Page   of 5

Tanyaz

Coolbie

Tanyaz

Joined: 03 December 2009

Posts: 35348

Posted: 08 February 2010 at 7:40pm | IP Logged
Commentator , you make more sense than any article or anyone ....You are absolutley right . But if the creatives think that the ymessed up then why are they doing it again with this engagement thing.
If tomorrow manav does put sindoor on Archana in front of bappa then it only means one thing , he does acknowledges the fact that she indeed is his wife .
I hope it means something to it not because the priest is putting pressure ...

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "Kadoos Manav ya the lovable Manav!!!!! (Page 5)" in Pavitra Rishta forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

commentator

Senior Member

commentator

Joined: 12 January 2010

Posts: 434

Posted: 08 February 2010 at 8:10pm | IP Logged
@Tanyaz:
 
Again, I offer what I believe the  creatives are trying to get us to feel, and given the context, they're not completely off on this one: Manav is, like all of us, both a private and a public person. His public self is forced to act in ways that sadden and sometimes anger his private self. The engagement, if there is one, like the sindoor on Shravani, is just one more public affirmation of his assurance to Girish that he will do the right thing by her. Now what's the difference between being verbally affianced and affianced with a ring? Both are promises, and he has already made what to any honourable man is the the more important of the two promises, given his word - which means a lot to him - to defend Shravani's and the family's honour. Obviously, a) we, as romantics, as women's libbers, as moral beings, can't agree that this should be his highest priority, and b) given the new circumstances of Archana's refusal to divorce in court, in hindsight his was a lousy decision. But having once committed - and in the thrall of creatives who turn a deaf ear to our loudest libbing :-) -  he feels morally obliged to see the thing through.  But the temple is where his private self comes into play, a place where between Bappa and him there is only the truth, one such truth being his simultaneous feelings of love, guilt, regret, and attraction towards Archana. There has already been the episode of the miraculously returned mangalsutra; we are thus encouraged to view everything happening in the temple as that which represents Manav's real feelings and hopes. His holding Archana's hand on the stairs isn't just to help her up the stairs literally, nor merely a romantic gesture; above all it represents the fact - acknowledged before God - of their being the most appropriate partners and helpmeets for each other in the longer journey of life.   
 
Commentator 


Edited by commentator - 08 February 2010 at 8:36pm

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

Tanyazgaurimisha

nikitagmc

IF-Sizzlerz

nikitagmc

Joined: 01 January 2009

Posts: 14369

Posted: 08 February 2010 at 8:22pm | IP Logged
Excellent post commentator... very balanced... calm and as I always say.. extremely cool.
 
Agree with you totally.

smrth

Goldie

smrth

Joined: 21 December 2009

Posts: 2229

Posted: 08 February 2010 at 8:38pm | IP Logged

If creatives have figured out that they have screwed and this is an attempt at some retrieval then why are they going ahead with another blunder of ring ceremony? To be able to come up with another lovely correction?

If we should accept their mangled efforts then their subtle way of exonerating Archana on account of Vandana's injury [even if by proxy] by taking up her presumed fall [again by proxy] at least in Manav's eye should not go unnoticed.

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

koolsadhu1000

koolsadhu1000

IF-Sizzlerz

koolsadhu1000

Joined: 03 July 2007

Posts: 20983

Posted: 08 February 2010 at 8:46pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by samarth_050

If creatives have figured out that they have screwed and this is an attempt at some retrieval then why are they going ahead with another blunder of ring ceremony? To be able to come up with another lovely correction?

If we should accept their mangled efforts then their subtle way of exonerating Archana on account of Vandana's injury [even if by proxy] by taking up her presumed fall [again by proxy] at least in Manav's eye should not go unnoticed.

 
How I second u . If creatives will present god this way , I will put my perspective out tomorrow.

Tanyaz

Coolbie

Tanyaz

Joined: 03 December 2009

Posts: 35348

Posted: 08 February 2010 at 8:56pm | IP Logged
well said commentator . I am looking forward to the episode tomorrow . You have got me thinking a little  different now . bappa has suddenly appered in the equation . Let's see what happens tomorrow ...
Keep in touch Ok ,


Edited by Tanyaz - 08 February 2010 at 9:00pm

Spartacus

IF-Dazzler

Spartacus

Joined: 23 July 2007

Posts: 3506

Posted: 09 February 2010 at 1:11am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Tanyaz

Unborn child , unborn child ....what about the ones who are born and living ...the yhave a life too , not just the unborn child .
The man is married akash .  he is married to a woman who loves him and depends on him .
he thought she had mad mistakes that led to the failure of their marriage , now he knows that she did not make those mistakes and that all was a misunderstanding .
he is wrong .......what  he is doing to her is unforgivable .
 
about  the unborn child , there are many different ways to take care of the situation but Manav himself is dying to take care of Shravani and that unborn child .
 
But spare a thought its no fault of the baby, and people already talking about eliminating it as it would bring shame for Shravani.
I know that very well Tanya, he his married. He loves her to the end of the world, no two ways about it.
Ya but the situation has turned too grim, if shravani wasnt there u would have accepted her whole heartedly.
No i don't think so there is any other possible way too save the child, may be taking the kid to US its all temporary way out, but not a permanent solution
 
 

geethika

Goldie

geethika

Joined: 21 January 2010

Posts: 1680

Posted: 09 February 2010 at 3:42am | IP Logged
I think Manav will not put sindoor on Archana's maang in today's episode..
Bcoz there is no sindoor on her maang in today's SBS segment......

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
manav is disgusting(Disappointing Manav Pg5)

2 3 4 5 6

-SONU- 43 7005 14 January 2010 at 10:01pm
By nikitagmc
Manav's second marriage puredesi21 3 2860 04 January 2010 at 11:37pm
By vandanir
TB Articl: Manav To Chosse

2 3 4

ROBlicious. 24 3423 22 December 2009 at 7:49pm
By -Dimple-
Manav : Way out of Line

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

koolsadhu1000 57 6892 19 December 2009 at 7:52pm
By koolsadhu1000
Manav will not marry Shravani!!!!!!!!!! -ALI- 5 5012 17 December 2009 at 7:28am
By *Shruti*

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Pavitra Rishta Topic Index

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.