Originally posted by koolsadhu1000
@ sonu272 and koolsadhu1000
Love and responsibility choices r tough but one can be responsible by always remaining true to his love too . In the Ramayan , Ram sent Sita away to the forest as people were talking and it was not really in the interest of the kingdom to have chaos at that moment . For chaos was threatening to break out . Many have criticised Ram for this action.........and those opinions r subjective . But what i want to say is Ram id not marry a second time although a lot of pressure was put on him by his ministers , Guru , and family too . It was perfectly normal for a king to marry again in those days .His own father had three wives . Besides Ram was asked to marry for an heir . Yet he refused . He slept on the floor , and ate fruits and roots just as Sita was living in the forest . He didnt look at another woman . There were only so much adjustments that he cud make . As a lover , as a husband hhe remained true to his pavitra rishta with Sita till the end and Sita won as a woman .
There is no anger in Manav or Savitas mind about girish's role in this whole mess . There jolly well shud be . Girish is hypocrite . The very same loser household of the Deshmukhs that he turned down was perfectly ok for him once he discovered his daughter had gotten laid and knocked up . Savita to this point has licked and licked Girish's shoes only for money . And Manav has supported her . He ignores Damodar , who truly loves him...........infact , only Damodar truly loves Manav in that family . He pampers Savita who tried to sell him twice in the marraige market . There is no anger about that . Savita can be so foul mouthed and explosive with the Karanjkars who were decent folk .........but Savita did not run and catch Girishs collar when Sachin died saying U killed my son ............u had seen his mental state yet u ruthlessly phoned at night to send him over the edge , u cruel man ..............meri hai lagegi tumhe . No , we see her giving unecessary hai to Sulochana .........who really isnt responsible in any way for Sachins death . we see her running to Karanjkar home to lay fresh guilt trip on Archu with Sachins sari . And Manav supports her in this . The reason given by Manav fans here is poor sweetu Manav's brain is addled because of the grief . I say BULL .
I completly agree with you guys on this. Manav is in the WRONG. The comparison involving Ram and Sita was particularly brilliant. Even though Ram was forced to seperate from Sita, he stayed true to their bond, and to his committment to her. He HONORED her. He was FAITHFUL. To me, without those two things, love is useless. And unfortunatly, by his decisions and actions Manav has proved his love to be weak. Too me, his protestations of love are nothing but words. They mean nothing, because his actions do not support his words.
Also, he is MARRIED to Archu. How can you just abandon your wife like that?
Where is his so-called SANSKAR then? He needs MAJOR character development if he and Archu are ever to be one again. Archu has developed as a person. Recent events are examples. Now its Manav's turn. He will realize what an ass he has been. He will have to break off his engagement (how can he be engaged to someone when he is still married I dont know??!!, but anyways), to that weak-willed Shravani
, and realizes the only promise (committment and relationship) that matters is the one he made with Archu. The one he made when is married her. God..I am sooo annoyed with Manav...lol, although I'm pretty sure everyone can tell.
SO yeah, thats my two cents.