Posted: 06 January 2010 at 8:31am | IP Logged
sonu272 I am on your side in this argument .
I would not call him disgusting , however . But I wud definetely call him WRONG .
I do not believe he has full right to be angry . I can make a case for Archana's unresponsiveness and point out hundreds of mistakes that sweetu Manav has done ...............but i wont go into those details here . Read my earlier posts for that ..........sab detail mein udhar hai .The latest being guptill's own thread .........I dont like this Manav . My views r there too .
The biggest thing that currently goes against sweetu Manav is that he damaged the Pavitra Rishta by agreeing to marry Shravani . They cud have shown any damn thing but agreeing to marry really damAGED IT . He cud have said he was burned out . That he was still reeling under the effects of his earlier broken marraige .........that as a human he was simply not upto it . But he was eager to marry Shravni ............even Savita isnt responsibble for that decision , it was his alone .
Archu refused to marry Satish ..........and remained true to the rishta of the heart inspite of the divorce going on in court . There is an argument made here that Satish was not pregnant . Well , even if Satish did have the capacity to become pregnant I want to point out that THAT IS NOT THE ISSUE HERE . Why shud the pregnancy change anything ? If Manav and Archu had not been divorced and still living together , and this same thing had happened , was Manav gonna divorce Archu and marry Shravni ? Or ,if archu was pregnant too , was he going to marry Shravni , have two wives , and be ' responsible '?
Love and responsibility choices r tough but one can be responsible by always remaining true to his love too . In the Ramayan , Ram sent Sita away to the forest as people were talking and it was not really in the interest of the kingdom to have chaos at that moment . For chaos was threatening to break out . Many have criticised Ram for this action.........and those opinions r subjective . But what i want to say is Ram id not marry a second time although a lot of pressure was put on him by his ministers , Guru , and family too . It was perfectly normal for a king to marry again in those days .His own father had three wives . Besides Ram was asked to marry for an heir . Yet he refused . He slept on the floor , and ate fruits and roots just as Sita was living in the forest . He didnt look at another woman . There were only so much adjustments that he cud make . As a lover , as a husband hhe remained true to his pavitra rishta with Sita till the end and Sita won as a woman .
There is no anger in Manav or Savitas mind about girish's role in this whole mess . There jolly well shud be . Girish is hypocrite . The very same loser household of the Deshmukhs that he turned down was perfectly ok for him once he discovered his daughter had gotten laid and knocked up . Savita to this point has licked and licked Girish's shoes only for money . And Manav has supported her . He ignores Damodar , who truly loves him...........infact , only Damodar truly loves Manav in that family . He pampers Savita who tried to sell him twice in the marraige market . There is no anger about that . Savita can be so foul mouthed and explosive with the Karanjkars who were decent folk .........but Savita did not run and catch Girishs collar when Sachin died saying U killed my son ............u had seen his mental state yet u ruthlessly phoned at night to send him over the edge , u cruel man ..............meri hai lagegi tumhe . No , we see her giving unecessary hai to Sulochana .........who really isnt responsible in any way for Sachins death . we see her running to Karanjkar home to lay fresh guilt trip on Archu with Sachins sari . And Manav supports her in this . The reason given by Manav fans here is poor sweetu Manav's brain is addled because of the grief . I say BULL .