Debate Mansion
Debate Mansion

India-Forums

   

Should homosexual parents be allowed to adopt? (Page 12)

qwertyesque IF-Rockerz
qwertyesque
qwertyesque

Joined: 03 December 2006
Posts: 5953

Posted: 07 September 2009 at 3:42pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by crazy_sunny

If single . unmarried ppl eg sushmita sen R allowed to adopt then why not a Homos?


the difference lies in the sane and insane...  Women adopting is still allowed.. can single males be allowed the same privilege... ? - veri unlikely....sending the kids to these "gaysters" is risking them big time....
qwertyesque IF-Rockerz
qwertyesque
qwertyesque

Joined: 03 December 2006
Posts: 5953

Posted: 07 September 2009 at 3:44pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


not the molestation... but their wierd sense and orientation would be more like it.. arent they abnormal and pervs...?
rogna IF-Rockerz
rogna
rogna

Joined: 30 November 2007
Posts: 5150

Posted: 07 September 2009 at 7:26pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


this stats is a bit inaccurate don't you think?? cause like the homosexuals couple who adopt children are much fewer than the heterosexuals couple who adopt children. the fact that homosexuals are quite newly allowed to adopt children have also to be taken account. it's just like the dpt, saying democratic country will not wage war against democratic country, but democracy is popular quite lately only by the end of the 19th century.
return_to_hades IF-Veteran Member
return_to_hades
return_to_hades

Joined: 18 January 2006
Posts: 21481

Posted: 07 September 2009 at 9:00pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by rongna

Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


this stats is a bit inaccurate don't you think?? cause like the homosexuals couple who adopt children are much fewer than the heterosexuals couple who adopt children. the fact that homosexuals are quite newly allowed to adopt children have also to be taken account. it's just like the dpt, saying democratic country will not wage war against democratic country, but democracy is popular quite lately only by the end of the 19th century.


According to the US Department of health and human services - Children are more likely to be abused or mistreated by biological parents rather than adoptive parents. Sexual abuse is more likely to be committed by friends and neighbors rather than parents.

Nearly 80 percent (79.9%) of perpetrators were parents.4 Other relatives accounted for an additional 6.6 percent. Unmarried partners of parents accounted for 4.5 percent (figure 5–2). Of the parents who were perpetrators, nearly 90 percent (87.7%) were biological parents, 4.2 percent were stepparents, and 0.6 percent were adoptive parents.5

Overall, 7.2 percent of all perpetrators were associated with sexually abusing a child. The percentage of perpetrators of sexual abuse was highest among friends or neighbors (57.7%), other relatives (32.0%), and child daycare providers (23.9%).

Source: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm07/chapter5.htm

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Beyond_the_Veil

chal_phek_mat Senior Member
chal_phek_mat
chal_phek_mat

Joined: 07 March 2008
Posts: 958

Posted: 08 September 2009 at 4:27am | IP Logged
Originally posted by qwertyesque

Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


not the molestation... but their wierd sense and orientation would be more like it.. arent they abnormal and pervs...?
Defination of terms like Abnormality/perversion changes by times
 
Homosexuality was abnormal by some ancient laws of religion, but now in the current times those religious laws are replaced by Penal code of conduct of India. and it is considered to be abnormal to be following those antiquated religious laws, people call those people as extremists and homosexuality is considered to be legal by Indian penal code nowWink
 

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Beyond_the_Veil

rogna IF-Rockerz
rogna
rogna

Joined: 30 November 2007
Posts: 5150

Posted: 08 September 2009 at 5:57am | IP Logged
Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Originally posted by qwertyesque

Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


not the molestation... but their wierd sense and orientation would be more like it.. arent they abnormal and pervs...?
Defination of terms like Abnormality/perversion changes by times
 
Homosexuality was abnormal by some ancient laws of religion, but now in the current times those religious laws are replaced by Penal code of conduct of India. and it is considered to be abnormal to be following those antiquated religious laws, people call those people as extremists and homosexuality is considered to be legal by Indian penal code nowWink
 
really?? isn't there is law against homosexuality in india??
rogna IF-Rockerz
rogna
rogna

Joined: 30 November 2007
Posts: 5150

Posted: 08 September 2009 at 6:00am | IP Logged
Originally posted by return_to_hades

Originally posted by rongna

Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


this stats is a bit inaccurate don't you think?? cause like the homosexuals couple who adopt children are much fewer than the heterosexuals couple who adopt children. the fact that homosexuals are quite newly allowed to adopt children have also to be taken account. it's just like the dpt, saying democratic country will not wage war against democratic country, but democracy is popular quite lately only by the end of the 19th century.


According to the US Department of health and human services - Children are more likely to be abused or mistreated by biological parents rather than adoptive parents. Sexual abuse is more likely to be committed by friends and neighbors rather than parents.

Nearly 80 percent (79.9%) of perpetrators were parents.4 Other relatives accounted for an additional 6.6 percent. Unmarried partners of parents accounted for 4.5 percent (figure 5'2). Of the parents who were perpetrators, nearly 90 percent (87.7%) were biological parents, 4.2 percent were stepparents, and 0.6 percent were adoptive parents.5

Overall, 7.2 percent of all perpetrators were associated with sexually abusing a child. The percentage of perpetrators of sexual abuse was highest among friends or neighbors (57.7%), other relatives (32.0%), and child daycare providers (23.9%).

Source: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm07/chapter5.htm


thanks for the state rthSmileSmile
chal_phek_mat Senior Member
chal_phek_mat
chal_phek_mat

Joined: 07 March 2008
Posts: 958

Posted: 08 September 2009 at 9:16am | IP Logged
Originally posted by rongna

Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Originally posted by qwertyesque

Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


not the molestation... but their wierd sense and orientation would be more like it.. arent they abnormal and pervs...?
Defination of terms like Abnormality/perversion changes by times
 
Homosexuality was abnormal by some ancient laws of religion, but now in the current times those religious laws are replaced by Penal code of conduct of India. and it is considered to be abnormal to be following those antiquated religious laws, people call those people as extremists and homosexuality is considered to be legal by Indian penal code nowWink
 
really?? isn't there is law against homosexuality in india??

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
Divorce through sms allowed?

2 3 4 5 6

Author: Summer3   Replies: 42   Views: 2422

Summer3 42 2422 27 July 2009 at 1:12am by Fair-n-luvly
When should kids be allowed out alone?

2

Author: shabd_lover   Replies: 15   Views: 986

shabd_lover 15 986 05 October 2007 at 11:46am by raj5000
Pakistanis are not allowed in Mumbai hote

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Author: ThE_kHan07   Replies: 67   Views: 5052

ThE_kHan07 67 5052 02 September 2007 at 10:13am by Bhaskar.T
women allowed in combat?

Author: Athena90   Replies: 9   Views: 611

Athena90 9 611 31 January 2006 at 10:48am by euro_pakigal
Would you adopt a child?

2

Author: ashley1   Replies: 14   Views: 986

ashley1 14 986 09 November 2005 at 7:48pm by Aparna_BD

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Debate Mansion Topic Index

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index