Debate Mansion

   

Should homosexual parents be allowed to adopt? (Page 12)

Post Reply New Post

Page 12 of 14

qwertyesque

IF-Rockerz

qwertyesque

Joined: 03 December 2006

Posts: 5953

Posted: 07 September 2009 at 3:42pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by crazy_sunny

If single . unmarried ppl eg sushmita sen R allowed to adopt then why not a Homos?


the difference lies in the sane and insane...  Women adopting is still allowed.. can single males be allowed the same privilege... ? - veri unlikely....sending the kids to these "gaysters" is risking them big time....

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "Should homosexual parents be allowed to adopt? (Page 12)" in Debate Mansion forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

qwertyesque

IF-Rockerz

qwertyesque

Joined: 03 December 2006

Posts: 5953

Posted: 07 September 2009 at 3:44pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


not the molestation... but their wierd sense and orientation would be more like it.. arent they abnormal and pervs...?

rogna

IF-Rockerz

rogna

Joined: 30 November 2007

Posts: 5150

Posted: 07 September 2009 at 7:26pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


this stats is a bit inaccurate don't you think?? cause like the homosexuals couple who adopt children are much fewer than the heterosexuals couple who adopt children. the fact that homosexuals are quite newly allowed to adopt children have also to be taken account. it's just like the dpt, saying democratic country will not wage war against democratic country, but democracy is popular quite lately only by the end of the 19th century.

return_to_hades

IF-Veteran Member

return_to_hades

Joined: 18 January 2006

Posts: 20627

Posted: 07 September 2009 at 9:00pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by rongna

Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


this stats is a bit inaccurate don't you think?? cause like the homosexuals couple who adopt children are much fewer than the heterosexuals couple who adopt children. the fact that homosexuals are quite newly allowed to adopt children have also to be taken account. it's just like the dpt, saying democratic country will not wage war against democratic country, but democracy is popular quite lately only by the end of the 19th century.


According to the US Department of health and human services - Children are more likely to be abused or mistreated by biological parents rather than adoptive parents. Sexual abuse is more likely to be committed by friends and neighbors rather than parents.

Nearly 80 percent (79.9%) of perpetrators were parents.4 Other relatives accounted for an additional 6.6 percent. Unmarried partners of parents accounted for 4.5 percent (figure 52). Of the parents who were perpetrators, nearly 90 percent (87.7%) were biological parents, 4.2 percent were stepparents, and 0.6 percent were adoptive parents.5

Overall, 7.2 percent of all perpetrators were associated with sexually abusing a child. The percentage of perpetrators of sexual abuse was highest among friends or neighbors (57.7%), other relatives (32.0%), and child daycare providers (23.9%).

Source: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm07/chapter5.htm

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Beyond_the_Veil

chal_phek_mat

Senior Member

chal_phek_mat

Joined: 07 March 2008

Posts: 958

Posted: 08 September 2009 at 4:27am | IP Logged
Originally posted by qwertyesque

Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


not the molestation... but their wierd sense and orientation would be more like it.. arent they abnormal and pervs...?
Defination of terms like Abnormality/perversion changes by times
 
Homosexuality was abnormal by some ancient laws of religion, but now in the current times those religious laws are replaced by Penal code of conduct of India. and it is considered to be abnormal to be following those antiquated religious laws, people call those people as extremists and homosexuality is considered to be legal by Indian penal code nowWink
 

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Beyond_the_Veil

rogna

IF-Rockerz

rogna

Joined: 30 November 2007

Posts: 5150

Posted: 08 September 2009 at 5:57am | IP Logged
Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Originally posted by qwertyesque

Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


not the molestation... but their wierd sense and orientation would be more like it.. arent they abnormal and pervs...?
Defination of terms like Abnormality/perversion changes by times
 
Homosexuality was abnormal by some ancient laws of religion, but now in the current times those religious laws are replaced by Penal code of conduct of India. and it is considered to be abnormal to be following those antiquated religious laws, people call those people as extremists and homosexuality is considered to be legal by Indian penal code nowWink
 
really?? isn't there is law against homosexuality in india??

rogna

IF-Rockerz

rogna

Joined: 30 November 2007

Posts: 5150

Posted: 08 September 2009 at 6:00am | IP Logged
Originally posted by return_to_hades

Originally posted by rongna

Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


this stats is a bit inaccurate don't you think?? cause like the homosexuals couple who adopt children are much fewer than the heterosexuals couple who adopt children. the fact that homosexuals are quite newly allowed to adopt children have also to be taken account. it's just like the dpt, saying democratic country will not wage war against democratic country, but democracy is popular quite lately only by the end of the 19th century.


According to the US Department of health and human services - Children are more likely to be abused or mistreated by biological parents rather than adoptive parents. Sexual abuse is more likely to be committed by friends and neighbors rather than parents.

Nearly 80 percent (79.9%) of perpetrators were parents.4 Other relatives accounted for an additional 6.6 percent. Unmarried partners of parents accounted for 4.5 percent (figure 5'2). Of the parents who were perpetrators, nearly 90 percent (87.7%) were biological parents, 4.2 percent were stepparents, and 0.6 percent were adoptive parents.5

Overall, 7.2 percent of all perpetrators were associated with sexually abusing a child. The percentage of perpetrators of sexual abuse was highest among friends or neighbors (57.7%), other relatives (32.0%), and child daycare providers (23.9%).

Source: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm07/chapter5.htm


thanks for the state rthSmileSmile

chal_phek_mat

Senior Member

chal_phek_mat

Joined: 07 March 2008

Posts: 958

Posted: 08 September 2009 at 9:16am | IP Logged
Originally posted by rongna

Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Originally posted by qwertyesque

Originally posted by chal_phek_mat

Hmmm if the reason for disallowing homosexual's to adopt children is child molestation, then I think there the hetrosexual's are the ones who should be disallowed to adopt because the child molestations happen more at the hands of the hetrosexuals than the homosexual

 
There seems to be another thread of people who think that homosexuals adopting children will cause bad effects on their children, well if you cant control your own children, why the heck are you questioning someone else's parenting.


not the molestation... but their wierd sense and orientation would be more like it.. arent they abnormal and pervs...?
Defination of terms like Abnormality/perversion changes by times
 
Homosexuality was abnormal by some ancient laws of religion, but now in the current times those religious laws are replaced by Penal code of conduct of India. and it is considered to be abnormal to be following those antiquated religious laws, people call those people as extremists and homosexuality is considered to be legal by Indian penal code nowWink
 
really?? isn't there is law against homosexuality in india??

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
Divorce through sms allowed?

2 3 4 5 6

Summer3 42 2270 27 July 2009 at 1:12am
By Fair-n-luvly
When should kids be allowed out alone?

2

shabd_lover 15 944 05 October 2007 at 11:46am
By raj5000
Pakistanis are not allowed in Mumbai hote

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

ThE_kHan07 67 4822 02 September 2007 at 10:13am
By Bhaskar.T
women allowed in combat? Athena90 9 565 31 January 2006 at 10:48am
By euro_pakigal
Would you adopt a child?

2

ashley1 14 929 09 November 2005 at 7:48pm
By Aparna_BD

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Debate Mansion Topic Index

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.