Poll
he hadn't exiled Sita, hadn't asked for Agni praveshna or her shapat?
Poll Choice |
---|
he hadn't exiled Sita, hadn't asked for Agni praveshna or her shapat?
Poll Choice |
---|
Originally posted by: Kal ElI would probably have criticized him a bit for not doing something when people were doubting his wife's honour. As a husband, he had to protect her dignity too (besides his raj dharm) and to simply ignore the accusations and let people go on saying that stuff about Sita would be...uncomfortable. Maybe he should have devised an Agni Pariksha for the people: all subjects who doubted Sita would have to walk through fire. If they burned their suspicions were wrong. If they remained untouched they were correct. π
How about this: what if Rama had abdicated the throne in Bharata's favour and left with Sita? This way he wouldn't have had to abandon his (pregnant) wife and he wouldn't be "forcibly" keeping Sita as the Queen when people suspect her. As it is Bharat was doing an excellent job ruling Ayodhya. This would have taught quite a lesson to the people of Ayodhya since they would have lost both Rama and Sita due to their stupid suspicions. π
comment:
p_commentcount