This content was originally posted by: sonur15U r rite laks and i agree with u on this national language laks but u also know that most of the people understand Hindi in India it is easy for everyone to understand this language in India...and leave others u r a south indian and your hindi is too good ....it feels great believe me...even i try to speak bengali but god save the other side ...π...my punjabi is as bad as bengali,gujrati..
By the way itana bold mai kyo likha yeh sab...π
This content was originally posted by: sonur15haa i know and u took advantage of that laksπ am i rite π. Afterall raso is written in a language with is bit closer to hindi.U not only read that book but u xplained that book to everyone on PRC forum π€£.
Well, there can B nothing wrong in not learning anything for that matter just as I don't see anything wrong in learning anything either . But certainly learning something wud B preferable to not learning it ! As far as a language is considered its always to ones advantage as it helps one to communicate with others. It shud B seen as such . Many political leaders of the nothern parts of India oppose English but that isn't a wise choice either. When there R clear advantages of learning that language it only makes good sense to learn it. Why is learning a language seen as an affront to ones regionality ? It's a fact that Hindi & English R the two languages of communication in our country & most politicians who R opposing either make sure that their own kids learn the two languages well, notwithstanding what they may say in their speeches to the masses !
This content was originally posted by: angie.4u
Well, there can B nothing wrong in not learning anything for that matter just as I don't see anything wrong in learning anything either . But certainly learning something wud B preferable to not learning it ! As far as a language is considered its always to ones advantage as it helps one to communicate with others. It shud B seen as such . Many political leaders of the nothern parts of India oppose English but that isn't a wise choice either. When there R clear advantages of learning that language it only makes good sense to learn it. Why is learning a language seen as an affront to ones regionality ? It's a fact that Hindi & English R the two languages of communication in our country & most politicians who R opposing either make sure that their own kids learn the two languages well, notwithstanding what they may say in their speeches to the masses !
This content was originally posted by: lakshmim_84<br>true.learning something is preferable......and thats why, the schools usually have two languages in their course. You have said that Hindi is the language of communication in India...however, that is not the case in southern states. Here hindi is not at all used.so why wld a student from one of these southern state find hindi to be more important than their reigional language which is used more for communication.<br>As far as communicating with people outside te state - whether it be in india or outside, we have english and most of the students from the southern states learn english. <br>Also, none of the southern states have banned hindi........if the students want, they can choose hindi over the regional language........ All that we want to oppose is, imposing the language hindi on us...no one can impose any language.if we want and we find, hindi shld be the more important than the regional language, we will choose it........otherwise, we will not<br>
comment:
p_commentcount