Debate Mansion

   

Your opinion on abortion (Page 7)

Post Reply New Post

Page 7 of 21

rogna

IF-Rockerz

rogna

Joined: 30 November 2007

Posts: 5150

Posted: 13 April 2009 at 11:17pm | IP Logged
well even though i don't like the idea of abortion with the exception of the mother's health condition and in the rape of cases, i do believe that abortion should be permissible by the government. the government should not ban the abortion clinics and the acts of abortion. those people, especially most of the youngsters who engaged in sexual relationship before marriage would not want to keep their child and would want to abort it instead of giving birth to their babies and keep them or give them up for adoption. these people will seek out the traditional physician or other methods for terminating their pregnancy in case the abortion clinic is made illegal, or they will go to illegal abortion clinics which operate on secretely. it is better for them to terminate their pregnancy if they want to in abortion clinic rather than alternative pregnancy termination ways. however, it is better for them not to engage in any kind of sexual relationships before marriage, or if they cannot stand it to use protections such as condoms and pills and other means to prevent pregnancy.

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "Your opinion on abortion (Page 7)" in Debate Mansion forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

rogna

IF-Rockerz

rogna

Joined: 30 November 2007

Posts: 5150

Posted: 13 April 2009 at 11:19pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by rongna

@lalitha janaki. you said that some people consider that murder are not immoral. can you give example of sane people who consider murder that are not immoral and not the murderer themselves. and also not the killing in case of war.

i do believe that the murderer are not normal or sane

rogna

IF-Rockerz

rogna

Joined: 30 November 2007

Posts: 5150

Posted: 13 April 2009 at 11:22pm | IP Logged
i also believe that pre-marital sexual relationship is not good personally. but then both the case of pre-martial relationship and abortion go back to each individual itself. if they want it and think that it is okay there is nothing we can do but respect their decision.

return_to_hades

IF-Veteran Member

return_to_hades

Joined: 18 January 2006

Posts: 20626

Posted: 13 April 2009 at 11:45pm | IP Logged
The points here have made me curious....hopefully someone provide me answers.

The general consensus seems that abortion is permissible in cases of rape, genetic disorder, risk to mother but not permissible in cases of unwanted pregnancy through consensual sex based on the premise that murder is immoral and wrong.

First lets just delve into morality and abortion in general -

What is morality? What makes something immoral? Why is abortion immoral? Is there a moral standard the entire world can follow?
What is the definition of murder? Why is murder immoral?
What makes a person human, and what constitutes life?
Is there justifiable taking of life?
Can one support the death sentence and still be pro life?
Does life begin at conception? Does a fetus really fulfill the logical test for "human life"? Is an acorn an oak tree? Upon conception can one guarantee that without abortion the fetus will carry full term and be born and survive to be a human? Without that guarantee is a fetus a real human or a potential human? Should masturbation be illegal because each precious sperm could potentially become life? Should women get pregnant and not waste what could potentially be life every month?
If you went on a trip to the Amazon and despite protective gear a small leech is now on your leg. You did not want the leech, but it happened. It's just one leech. It will suck your blood, but it will not be fatal. Most likely it will fall of in a few weeks if not days. Obviously its on you because you were careless, you took the risk. Are you obligated to care for that leech till it dies or detaches naturally? [Ooh I can sense the icy glares for that comparison]

A hypothetical case


Suppose the pregnant mother is a crack addict, alcoholic and a single mom. She has no steady job or income or family. However, she feels that she can take care of the baby and will go through with the birth and look after the child. You know the baby will be neglected and abused. Why the mother may even drug the child to keep it from crying. It will take months before welfare system acts and takes custody of a child. By then the child will already be scarred. It will add to the count of another child in the welfare system, unwanted and unloved because people want healthy children, not malnourished crack babies. Would the doctor have been morally wrong to perform an uninformed abortion to 'protect' the baby.

Now for the rape exception -


If you feel abortion is impermissible even in case of rape, how do you justify that one human should bear the burden for another humans indiscretion?
If you feel abortion is permissible in case of rape, does the same rule apply for statutory rape? If a fourteen year old girl willingly and consensually had sex with someone over eighteen and is pregnant, can she get abortion under rape exception? Can the legal system devalue statutory rape? Wont that not cause legitimate concerns of people predating on teenagers who are naive and impressionable?
How will we prevent people from calling consensual sex as rape? By law a person under influence of alcohol or drugs is not deemed capable of giving consent? What if people start claiming, I was drunk and he took advantage? Could it not ruin lives of guys who honestly thought they were having consensual sex?

Genetic Disorders  exception -


What makes a genetic disorder appropriate for abortion - fatality, painful or difficult life?
Some people find mild disabilities as life ruining, while others endure worse with a smile. How will we determine what exactly will cause a miserable and painful life?
Would we allow a teenager, a grown person choose euthanasia if they contracted a fatal disorder later in their life?

Health risk to mother exception -

What constitutes health risk, fatal risk or any health condition?
Reproductive damage, cosmetic damage, handicap?
Do we have a guarantee that the damage will take place? The birth could turn out to be fine?


The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Beyond_the_Veil

_Angie_

IF-Rockerz

_Angie_

Joined: 21 February 2008

Posts: 9888

Posted: 14 April 2009 at 12:28am | IP Logged
Good egs RTH , thats what I meant by saying that each point is debatable.
As per MTP act in India the female has been given full freedom of choice to abort if she desires without any consideration to morality. I feel its OK as its the mother who is going to undergo the trauma or pleasure of child birth & rearing as she perceives it to be so the decision too must B in her hands.
Issue of morality will never have a satisfactory outcome as there R different views on it


Edited by angie.4u - 14 April 2009 at 12:29am

*Woh Ajnabee*

IF-Sizzlerz

*Woh Ajnabee*

Joined: 15 September 2007

Posts: 22667

Posted: 14 April 2009 at 12:40am | IP Logged
Originally posted by return_to_hades

The points here have made me curious....hopefully someone provide me answers.
Aah, Sarina, long time no see. Tell me, why is it that we always end up on the opposite sides of the spectrum?

The general consensus seems that abortion is permissible in cases of rape, genetic disorder, risk to mother but not permissible in cases of unwanted pregnancy through consensual sex based on the premise that murder is immoral and wrong.
I'm a little iffy on the premises regarding genetic disorder and rape. In cases of genetic disorder, if we start picking and choosing individuals, I feel the implementation of a "brave new world" is on the way. And that makes me afraid.

First lets just delve into morality and abortion in general -

What is morality? I feel dictionary.com will do a better job then I will.

morality

/m?'rl?ti, m?-/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [muh-ral-i-tee, maw-] Show IPA –noun, plural -ties for 4–6.
1. conformity to the rules of right conduct; moral or virtuous conduct.
2. moral quality or character.
3. virtue in sexual matters; chastity.
4. a doctrine or system of morals.
5. moral instruction; a moral lesson, precept, discourse, or utterance.

What makes something immoral? That is a relative question, what may be immoral to you may not be immoral to me, and vice versa. And one's judgment of morality is based on one's beliefs and perceptions that are influenced by society, religion, and nurture in general. Why is abortion immoral? IMO, because it takes away a life. Is there a moral standard the entire world can follow? No, there isn't. And that is why I ask the world to live and let me live. If we start defining a general set of regulations regarding morality, we will have murderers coming and giving explanations as to how and when murder can be moral (not to hint at any subtle remarks regarding abortion here).
What is the definition of murder? To take away a life, to end it at your own will.  Why is murder immoral? Because you are taking away something that is not your's to take.
What makes a person human, and what constitutes life? What makes a person human? Birth, the concept of coming into the world. Living constitutes life, it may not be a good life, but a life nonetheless
Is there justifiable taking of life? Absolutely not.
Can one support the death sentence and still be pro life? Aaah, I don't know if one can. But one does. I am a supporter of the death penalty and still very much pro life.

Does life begin at conception?  Does a fetus really fulfill the logical test for "human life"? Is an acorn an oak tree? Upon conception can one guarantee that without abortion the fetus will carry full term and be born and survive to be a human? Without that guarantee is a fetus a real human or a potential human? Should masturbation be illegal because each precious sperm could potentially become life? Should women get pregnant and not waste what could potentially be life every month?

Now we are diverging into gray areas .... when does life begin is what you are trying to get at here, I believe. My theory is that whether life begins at birth or at conception, a fetus has the potential to come to life, and hence taking that right away from it is immoral (whatever that may mean). Tell me this - even if a fetus is not a human, is it still reasonable, moral, and justified for one to kill that fetus? Although the fetus is not living, is it not the case that it is still very much alive?

If you went on a trip to the Amazon and despite protective gear a small leech is now on your leg. You did not want the leech, but it happened. It's just one leech. It will suck your blood, but it will not be fatal. Most likely it will fall of in a few weeks if not days. Obviously its on you because you were careless, you took the risk. Are you obligated to care for that leech till it dies or detaches naturally? [Ooh I can sense the icy glares for that comparison]

Aah, your analogy makes me cringe. The icy glares is right. However, your analogy is flawed, because a leech is not something you created, it is not something that you gave life to, and the place to grow. And if that is the case, then you are very much obligated to care for that "leech".

A hypothetical case


Suppose the pregnant mother is a crack addict, alcoholic and a single mom. She has no steady job or income or family. However, she feels that she can take care of the baby and will go through with the birth and look after the child. You know the baby will be neglected and abused. Why the mother may even drug the child to keep it from crying. It will take months before welfare system acts and takes custody of a child. By then the child will already be scarred. It will add to the count of another child in the welfare system, unwanted and unloved because people want healthy children, not malnourished crack babies. Would the doctor have been morally wrong to perform an uninformed abortion to 'protect' the baby.

Yes, because just like you don't know whether the fetus will survive if abortion is prevented, and just like you don't know whether the child will be able to grow and prosper in society, you do not know that the child will be neglected, abused, scarred, or be on the welfare system. A doctor is protecting the child by taking his life? Aaah, do I sense a discussion on euthanasia coming along next?

Now for the rape exception -


If you feel abortion is impermissible even in case of rape, how do you justify that one human should bear the burden for another humans indiscretion?
If you feel abortion is permissible in case of rape, does the same rule apply for statutory rape? If a fourteen year old girl willingly and consensually had sex with someone over eighteen and is pregnant, can she get abortion under rape exception? Can the legal system devalue statutory rape? Wont that not cause legitimate concerns of people predating on teenagers who are naive and impressionable?
How will we prevent people from calling consensual sex as rape? By law a person under influence of alcohol or drugs is not deemed capable of giving consent? What if people start claiming, I was drunk and he took advantage? Could it not ruin lives of guys who honestly thought they were having consensual sex?

Consensual sex is a very different and controversial topic. I personally believe that it is not the same as rape, consent is consent. I honestly feel that many guys suffer through the legal system because teenage girls and teenage girls' parents have found a way to protect their little girls and to be able to perform these abortions as justifiable.

Genetic Disorders  exception -


What makes a genetic disorder appropriate for abortion - fatality, painful or difficult life?
Some people find mild disabilities as life ruining, while others endure worse with a smile. How will we determine what exactly will cause a miserable and painful life?
Would we allow a teenager, a grown person choose euthanasia if they contracted a fatal disorder later in their life?

That is exactly it, we do not determine that. Nature does. Most severe disorders abort the child through natural abortion. Otherwise, if the child is born with defects, it is still able to survive and live. Who says that we must all be blonde haired and blue eyed? Diversity is the key, and with diversity you get the good and the bad. Eliminating the bad makes the good meaningless as well. Not to say that defects only exist in nature to define beauty. But it is late and I'm sure my ideas are not making sense here.

Health risk to mother exception -

What constitutes health risk, fatal risk or any health condition?
Reproductive damage, cosmetic damage, handicap?
Do we have a guarantee that the damage will take place? The birth could turn out to be fine?

No we do not have a guarantee on that. But if there is a risk, then proper action should be taken. You cannot always have things as black and white, sometimes shades of gray are needed to define the black and the white.

Aaah, I should've waited until tomorrow to reply here when I was more sane, my thoughts are all jumbled together, do make sense of it if you can.



The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

return_to_hades

Beyond_the_Veil

IF-Sizzlerz

Joined: 12 February 2008

Posts: 11596

Posted: 14 April 2009 at 1:17am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

angelic_devil

IF-Rockerz

Requested selfban

Joined: 26 October 2004

Posts: 5676

Posted: 14 April 2009 at 7:00am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
Abortion Doctor Murdered

2

Jess. 14 648 08 June 2009 at 12:13am
By NaughtySon
Abortion of a foetus!!

2 3 4 5

Anuradha 35 2417 08 September 2008 at 7:17am
By RAJAYE_HIND
Should partial-birth abortion be banned?

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

~*MaNnU*~ 76 3405 25 April 2007 at 1:16pm
By raunaq
abortion eijaz_anita4eva 4 356 11 April 2006 at 6:59am
By Aparna_BD
Abortion....

2 3 4 5

Naina_Manam 33 1781 28 September 2005 at 7:07pm
By fatty1

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Debate Mansion Topic Index

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.