Teaching Homosexuality in Schools.. - Page 4

@ Raj --- Boss, colors to samajh aatey hain per hum itna bada bada aur bold font mein kyoon likh rahey hain😆  Kaheen tumhey bhi toh designer frames ki latt naheen lagi hui🤣

Thanks for everyone for views, will reply to them tomorrow - no time.... Edited by anon - 15 years ago

Originally posted by: Gauri_3

@ Raj --- Boss, colors to samajh aatey hain per hum itna bada bada aur bold font mein kyoon likh rahey hain😆  Kaheen tumhey bhi toh designer frames ki latt naheen lagi hui🤣

Edited by raj5000 - 15 years ago

Originally posted by: anon

Thanks for everyone for views, will reply to them tomorrow - no time....

 

@ RTH - yeah lolsss not teaching how to be gay - hahaha nice analogy hehe - yeah simply beause ther eis not enough characters to ask the Q in Subject like the one in the Post.

 

On Gay Gene Debate - Well something must make you prefer your own Gender. Hormones kick in @ Puberty so anyways will debate this one whether am for yah against this edebate later.

 

Waise Society defines 'norms' - so anything against the normal therefore is unnatural/Weird etc etc its not society just nature...nature considers the act of homophilia is more unnatural  if you pay attention to the acts these pervs indulge in.....and most of them in the pair look disgusting!!

 

If Gayism was deemed 'normal' /Acceptable- we would all be engaging in it but we are NOT. Sexual intercourse is by nature - not man made - so well trying to be polite here but well the way Gay people 'do it' = unnatural because it goes against Nature. And this Nature dates back to beginning of time from Humans and Animals. yeah cause and effect has some say in this matter otherwise we would be stuffing food up the wrong end.. in order to get nourishment!!!😆

 

BTW Do we have gay animals - just wondering? LOL which ones are you talking about the gay men!!?😆

 

Anyways gayism had discussion with friends - was winding the guys up but they shudder literally at thought of joke i made at them.I guess each genders understands their own as debate stemmed from me and another friend saying Men were hard to understand...( we were outnumbered tho 2 girls vs 4 guys)...and thats why there are gays lol because they understand own sex better than other sex hehe....but anyways they say girls are hard to understand but i guess both are hard to understand lol anywyas thts me going off on one hehe...

 

Its Majority Vs Minority - so if majority is hetrosexual then ? Its not majority or minority its hand and glove kinda situation... have you seen somebody wear a glove over his head or foot!!! you are to put things where they dont belong...😆

 

Anyways lots too say no time maybe later...

 

EDIT - Forgot main point - i know i agree teachers doalways try and teach things unbiased-ly but there is just NOT enough time to teach properly - only time really is these PSHE classes we have....😳 We already have too much to do 😳

Edited by qwertyesque - 15 years ago

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

Edited by raj5000 - 15 years ago

Originally posted by: Gauri_3

 

I am not saying teach kids how homosexuals copulate.  My point is teaching respect towards homos as part of respecting diversity and clearing up the myths.  Don't see what are the problems there except for some phobia prevalent in a section of masses against gayism. 

 Why leave how homosexual copulate (yikes is it even called copulate or have s*x oops SEX? no more desi escapism😆)? Isn't that the basis or driving factor of homosexual orientation? Problem is - Why to needlessly inculcate something in Georges/Georgias mind that he might feel the need to rediscover himself, SEXUALLY (abnormal), when this rediscovery has a possibility of adding one more to the count. Individuals respect is something everyone should be aware and know, right from childhood, infact I don't understand why some (other then gays) need to force this gay respect all of a sudden. Who is not respecting them? Go do whatever they want, against whatever, who cares as long as they don't encouraged to a point of canvassing gayism -   "We are Gays, You might be Gay, Come with US, Try it Once and Hey see, you too are Gay"

 

 

Mind elaborating your piggy example then.  What point were you trying to make there?  You said pig is not a pig unless piggy env teaches them.  I say you remove a pig from his piggy env but it will still remain a pig. 

No point, unless you too literally elaborate the mind and see what that means outside the literals.  

 1.Gayism is not "environmental" for most gays.  The ones who are gays by choice and not because that is their natural orientation, well - it again is their personal choice.  2.I would not comment on that either or ridicule them on it.  3. But for those who actually do feel naturally inclined towards opposite sex, it's brutal to call them names and ridicule them for something they have no control over.

 1.Then what is? Chalo atleast you agree, there are gays without any natural orientation involved.

 2.Why not? It is very important here, am spending no time for nothing lol, will you support or stay on the fence or go against?  (Respect for individual choice, is assumed).

 3.U meant bisexuals? Welll' I am assuming that is a typo...u meant same sex' no one is holding their hand and sending them to caravass, only thing is we cann't encourage such change of preferances, when its all seems like mind game or self controll, once we do, there is long line of people with weird agendas waiting for approvals from society/law.

 

My point was and is --- If we can't assess whether one is born homo then we can't assess either that they are born hetero either.  Being homo does not make them look different in any ways.  They are still as human as any other hetero.  In very few cases people turn to being homos because of some traumatic childhood experiences --- just like very few turn psycho or schiznophrenic.  You can't bas a general perception on homosexuality based on such outliers. 

 My point was for people who believe being gay is natural and proven by science. OK everything adds up, IMO. Humans??who said humans cann't be off beat or have abnormal sexual preferances..oh come on now, u r making me feel bad for no reason.  

 

 

 😆😆😆I think so far, it's the second hand treatment meted out to this community that is driven by political and politicians' personal interests.  Take the prejudiced vote bank away and you'll see a different picture.  Just because homos are in minority, the majority i trampling them down. 

 

LOLss isn't it better off that way, economy crisis sounds better then saving extinct human species  😉

Edit - fixed font, quotes remain as it is, Gauri - red, Ansh - blue

Edited by raj5000 - 15 years ago

@ Raj: From your posts, one thing that becomes quite apparent is that you are against homos because they indulge in "unnatural s*x".  Well, that would put whole bunch of heteros in a soup too.  Many do indulge in anal and oral varieties and enjoy it too - and that too with their legally wedded spouses.  How come these forms only become a problem when practiced by homos? 

If you support the discriminatory treatment of homos when it comes to marriage and other civil rights then you should also start canvassing for banning all birth control products, make any alternative form of s*x between heteros illegal, and ban indulgence in se*ual activity for other than reproductive objectives in mind.

There, tell me what you have to say on above points.  And remember, if you support s*x for pleasure amongst heteros, not opposed to different forms of acts practiced by heteros other than how god actually intended for human beings (per your side's repeated claims) then it would seem like what's good for the goose ain't good for the gander😉  Bahut soch samajh ker jawab dena, boss.

Originally posted by: anon

 

On Gay Gene Debate - Well something must make you prefer your own Gender. Hormones kick in @ Puberty so anyways will debate this one whether am for yah against this edebate later.

 

Chill. and take ur time.. we are at it, do we get some grade points now? 

 

BTW Do we have gay animals - just wondering? LOL

 

Yes, it seems somewhere it was like, getting rid of bad gene, it is a good practice... I  don't remember exactly what that meant.