Mindbender
IF-Sizzlerz
Joined: 21 October 2008
Posts: 15873
chal_phek_mat
Senior Member
Joined: 07 March 2008
Posts: 954

Meena1
IF-Stunnerz
Joined: 27 December 2005
Posts: 27530
Mindbender
IF-Sizzlerz
Joined: 21 October 2008
Posts: 15873



Mindbender
IF-Sizzlerz
Joined: 21 October 2008
Posts: 15873
Do you think that people like Hannah Pool make a lot out of statements like how articulate Obama is when it could simply have meant an appreciation only ? Or are they thinking it the right way (specially considering
the fact that she is so experienced )? Or are they right in thinking this way (even if its not correct) because they are not treated fairly ? ..Statements made on how articulate Obama may kinda seem very sarcastic.. but i have to read the original article to see what the tone is of the writer... Looking at it from a normal perspective.. i don't think it was made in a derogatory way.. i am sure they would say the samething about a white president (except W. Bush cuz in his case it'll simply be an oximoron)
I also think the same way
Next , i'll put the question in the last line only -
"But he is still an American, and what kind of a friend has America been to us?"
So will Obama after all really bring the change to East Africa ?specially when the people present there
themselves have apprehensions ! ..I am not aware of the past relationships of Kenya-America or Africa and America in general. so not sure if i can answer that.. However, Obama is still an American and i doubt it that his foriegn policy would be that different from that of previous administrations..
Ok
Btw -While reading the article, you all also might have some queries , or some points you'd like to disagree on, or some points which you might have thought were mighty interesting or unique .So if that's the case,do put up those points for discussion
..I didnt like that statement made by Sun's Times..
.. thats definitely not an articulate writer.
*******************************************************************************************************************
Talking more about racism that exists today , here is a poll conducted by washingtonpost -
http:////www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2009/01/19/ST2009011900012.html
The way the overall results are tilted towards what the whites feel, does indicate that an overwhelming number of whites have been considered in comparison to blacks, hence i'll consider the results given separately for blacks and whites.
First of all , its quite clear that the problem of racism has decreased , so kudos to that 
Next , a disturbing factor for me is the difference in percentage points between blacks and whites over these racial issues.
Does this indicate that majority of the whites are not aware of the problem or its seriousness?Or it tells that blacks seem to be considering it still more of a problem than what it really is ? If you think it is something in between, then towards whose side is it tilted ? ..I think racism definitely still exists today.. streotypes are something that can never be changed.. i have olny experienced this in NY soo cant really talk about the entire country.. But its fun to watch the reaction of an Old White Granny when a Black man gets into an empty subway cart.. she turns Snow-white..
..

A different way to look at it !
In my opinion , having a black man as president doesnt really mean that whites have accepted that them as equals.. the fact that he got elected was more due to the economic conditions of the country and cuz americans were just fed with watching that Chimp on TV.. I could bet you that if the economic conditions were not bad as they are today, a black man could have never been elected as president.
Why not John McCain ?
I have some more questions too regarding that poll , but they 'll be more apt if i could know more about the people who have given their responses in the poll. If someone can help me out here, i'd be grateful
return_to_hades
IF-Veteran Member
Joined: 18 January 2006
Posts: 18267
Meena1
IF-Stunnerz
Joined: 27 December 2005
Posts: 27530
Mindbender
IF-Sizzlerz
Joined: 21 October 2008
Posts: 15873





John Ryan starts out as your typical racist sexually abusive cop, but as the movie progresses you learn that difficulties of his life due to affirmative action and that he is willing to risk his life to save a black woman in the line of duty. We have Farhad an innocent Persian man constantly harassed due to his national origin and religion, yet he has no qualms on shooting his gun at an innocent Latino just because he assumes he is a gangbanger. 
| Topics | Topic Starter | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Racism | huneymonsta | 0 | 239 | 26 September 2007 at 6:40am By huneymonsta |
|
| Racism in India ?? | angel_111 | 16 | 767 | 22 June 2007 at 9:44pm By Sound |
|
| Racism - still a problem in C21st? | psawyer | 29 | 1118 | 17 March 2007 at 1:06pm By Dabulls23 |
|
| Hindsight : Shilpa was it about racism? | sareg | 10 | 534 | 29 January 2007 at 4:47pm By sareg |
|
| colour racism | eijaz_anita4eva | 1 | 319 | 25 April 2006 at 6:56am By Aparna_BD |
Be the part of India's biggest discussion portal.
It’s easy to Join and it’s free.
Register now while it’s free!
Already a member? Close this window and log in.