Harry Potter

   

Did Dumbledore have a right?

Post Reply New Post

Page 1 of 1

shellytt

Senior Member

shellytt

Joined: 27 January 2006

Posts: 908

Posted: 09 January 2009 at 10:35am | IP Logged
Here's a question for everyone.
 
Did Dumbledore have a right to be as secretive as he was about Harry's future? Did he have a right to withold information from Harry, like the Prophecy or even Snape's true colours?
 
Lets here what you have to say!LOL

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "Did Dumbledore have a right?" in Harry Potter forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

cityoflights

IF-Veteran Member

cityoflights

Joined: 11 September 2008

Posts: 12813

Posted: 09 January 2009 at 3:21pm | IP Logged
Hmm...this is a tough question, but I would have to say yes and no...yes because he only did what he did for Harry, even though Harry found it unreasonable. But no, because it was Harry life, and everyone has a right to their own life....Does that make sense? LOL

..RamKiJanaki..

IF-Stunnerz

..RamKiJanaki..

Joined: 20 August 2008

Posts: 44249

Posted: 09 January 2009 at 8:31pm | IP Logged
About Snape's true colors, I think Dumbledore was right in withholding that information, because had Harry known the truth about Snape since starting Hogwarts, he would have formed a very bad opinion about his father, and many of his actions would have been ruled by his emotions. The story would have been totally different, because many things happened due to Harry's strong dislike for Snape. Also, he may have tried to get closer to Snape feeling sympathy for him, and Snape would not have liked that, because as much as Harry had his mother's eyes, he was still a carbon copy of James. Snape did not want to be reminded of his past, and what "could have been" had Lily lived. Snape also requested Dumbledore not to tell anyone about his love for Lily, and Dumbledore respected that wish.
 
One more thing: Even though Lily was Harry's mother, Snape's love for Lily was totally between him and Lily, and since Lily was dead, it was his secret, and truthfully, none of Harry's business. So I don't grudge Dumbledore for withholding that info.
 
About the Prophesy though, I believe Dumbledore withheld that too long. I agree with him that in Year 1 and Year 2, telling Harry about the prophesy would have been too much to bear for a 11 or 12 year old (especially one who found out about magic at the age of 11). I also don't think his 3rd year was a good time either, because Harry was overwhelmed with finding someone "family-like", and thrusting the prophesy on him would have been too much. But 4th year, after Harry saw Voldemort resurrected, was the perfect time to tell Harry about the prophesy, because though Harry was still coming to terms with seeing Voldemort return, it would have give him time to think about everything and plan accordingly had he known about the prophesy. And also, he would have tried much harder at Occlumency during his 5th year if he knew of the real consequences of Voldemort invading his mind, and he might have given it a thought that Sirius may not have been taken prisoner by Voldemort, and even alerted the Order Members to check up on Sirius,
 
But then, if you think about it this way, telling someone that they had to kill someone else for the future of the Wizarding World is pretty big, and though I don't completely agree with Dumbledore's train of thought, I can see and understand the reasoning behind it. 
 
 
I don't think Dumbledore had a total right over keeping much of his information about Harry's future, but it ended up helping Harry in the end, because as he went in search of "that information" he learned a lot about the Deathly Hallows, Dumbledore's past, and also about his parents' past. In the end, he got more info than ever because Dumbledore kept much of his info. Follow my train of thought?
 
Great Post!

chhilt

IF-Rockerz

chhilt

Joined: 07 January 2008

Posts: 6450

Posted: 09 January 2009 at 8:44pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by godisone

About Snape's true colors, I think Dumbledore was right in withholding that information, because had Harry known the truth about Snape since starting Hogwarts, he would have formed a very bad opinion about his father, and many of his actions would have been ruled by his emotions. The story would have been totally different, because many things happened due to Harry's strong dislike for Snape. Also, he may have tried to get closer to Snape feeling sympathy for him, and Snape would not have liked that, because as much as Harry had his mother's eyes, he was still a carbon copy of James. Snape did not want to be reminded of his past, and what "could have been" had Lily lived. Snape also requested Dumbledore not to tell anyone about his love for Lily, and Dumbledore respected that wish.
 
One more thing: Even though Lily was Harry's mother, Snape's love for Lily was totally between him and Lily, and since Lily was dead, it was his secret, and truthfully, none of Harry's business. So I don't grudge Dumbledore for withholding that info.
 
About the Prophesy though, I believe Dumbledore withheld that too long. I agree with him that in Year 1 and Year 2, telling Harry about the prophesy would have been too much to bear for a 11 or 12 year old (especially one who found out about magic at the age of 11). I also don't think his 3rd year was a good time either, because Harry was overwhelmed with finding someone "family-like", and thrusting the prophesy on him would have been too much. But 4th year, after Harry saw Voldemort resurrected, was the perfect time to tell Harry about the prophesy, because though Harry was still coming to terms with seeing Voldemort return, it would have give him time to think about everything and plan accordingly had he known about the prophesy. And also, he would have tried much harder at Occlumency during his 5th year if he knew of the real consequences of Voldemort invading his mind, and he might have given it a thought that Sirius may not have been taken prisoner by Voldemort, and even alerted the Order Members to check up on Sirius,
 
But then, if you think about it this way, telling someone that they had to kill someone else for the future of the Wizarding World is pretty big, and though I don't completely agree with Dumbledore's train of thought, I can see and understand the reasoning behind it. 
 
 
I don't think Dumbledore had a total right over keeping much of his information about Harry's future, but it ended up helping Harry in the end, because as he went in search of "that information" he learned a lot about the Deathly Hallows, Dumbledore's past, and also about his parents' past. In the end, he got more info than ever because Dumbledore kept much of his info. Follow my train of thought?
 
Great Post!
 
Wow, Lalitha... I couldn't have said it better myself! Thumbs Up

..RamKiJanaki..

IF-Stunnerz

..RamKiJanaki..

Joined: 20 August 2008

Posts: 44249

Posted: 10 January 2009 at 8:26am | IP Logged
Originally posted by chhilt

Originally posted by godisone

About Snape's true colors, I think Dumbledore was right in withholding that information, because had Harry known the truth about Snape since starting Hogwarts, he would have formed a very bad opinion about his father, and many of his actions would have been ruled by his emotions. The story would have been totally different, because many things happened due to Harry's strong dislike for Snape. Also, he may have tried to get closer to Snape feeling sympathy for him, and Snape would not have liked that, because as much as Harry had his mother's eyes, he was still a carbon copy of James. Snape did not want to be reminded of his past, and what "could have been" had Lily lived. Snape also requested Dumbledore not to tell anyone about his love for Lily, and Dumbledore respected that wish.
 
One more thing: Even though Lily was Harry's mother, Snape's love for Lily was totally between him and Lily, and since Lily was dead, it was his secret, and truthfully, none of Harry's business. So I don't grudge Dumbledore for withholding that info.
 
About the Prophesy though, I believe Dumbledore withheld that too long. I agree with him that in Year 1 and Year 2, telling Harry about the prophesy would have been too much to bear for a 11 or 12 year old (especially one who found out about magic at the age of 11). I also don't think his 3rd year was a good time either, because Harry was overwhelmed with finding someone "family-like", and thrusting the prophesy on him would have been too much. But 4th year, after Harry saw Voldemort resurrected, was the perfect time to tell Harry about the prophesy, because though Harry was still coming to terms with seeing Voldemort return, it would have give him time to think about everything and plan accordingly had he known about the prophesy. And also, he would have tried much harder at Occlumency during his 5th year if he knew of the real consequences of Voldemort invading his mind, and he might have given it a thought that Sirius may not have been taken prisoner by Voldemort, and even alerted the Order Members to check up on Sirius,
 
But then, if you think about it this way, telling someone that they had to kill someone else for the future of the Wizarding World is pretty big, and though I don't completely agree with Dumbledore's train of thought, I can see and understand the reasoning behind it. 
 
 
I don't think Dumbledore had a total right over keeping much of his information about Harry's future, but it ended up helping Harry in the end, because as he went in search of "that information" he learned a lot about the Deathly Hallows, Dumbledore's past, and also about his parents' past. In the end, he got more info than ever because Dumbledore kept much of his info. Follow my train of thought?
 
Great Post!
 
Wow, Lalitha... I couldn't have said it better myself! Thumbs Up
 
StarThank you!Star

fly_chick

Goldie

fly_chick

Joined: 20 November 2007

Posts: 1534

Posted: 11 January 2009 at 7:45am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Noor-best

Dumbledore had every right, because if not dumbledore to guide harry the right way then who???
his parents were dead
sirius in azkaban
and no one knew voldermort better than dumbledore.....if harry had known any of this stuff before he could have done something wrong judging by what he has to go throught everytime....
 
True but i feel Harry had a right to know about the prophecy in his 4th Year at least- though telling him about Snape would look like Dumbledore was betraying snapes trust, and Snape didn't want Harry to know because he hated him because of his Father but only protected him for lily.

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
Which Dumbledore Actor?

2 3 4

cityoflights 25 2008 25 January 2009 at 10:12am
By Ahlaam5
Dumbledore's Army Elimination Game

2 3 4 5 6

~*Thamizhan*~ 43 1992 31 August 2008 at 2:24am
By tukz_REmix
Did dumbledore really love/care 4 Harry?

2 3

Mit's113 18 3026 18 January 2008 at 1:53am
By lucky_lakshmi
dumbledore a "gay"-explain chinkyshona 9 652 07 January 2008 at 9:35pm
By *Jane*
Dumbledore - new info - article mumpet 1 407 21 October 2007 at 12:15am
By Eloquent

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.