Actress Shilpa Shetty says that if a project is not delayed, there is nothing wrong with no-pregnancy clause for actresses.
"I don't think there is anything wrong with the clause. At the end of the day, we all are here to work and a lot of money is riding on the actors," Shilpa told reporters during the press conference of "Dishkiyaoon".
"Yes, I can understand if the project goes on till four to five years, then it's not acceptable. But if you sign a project for a year or so, then I think it's fine. I personally feel there is nothing wrong with the (no) pregnancy clause," said the actress, who has turned producer with "Dishkiyaoon".
Whether no-pregnancy clause be included in an actress's contract became a topic of discussion ever since the rumours of Vidya Balan's pregnancy surfaced, although the actress has denied the reports.
Asked about her role as a producer, Shilpa said: "There is a lot of pressure on producers. I have to touch Sunny's feet who has managed to produce so many films. So far, the experience has been great and I am still learning a lot of things."
Meanwhile, the 38-year-old, who is on a break from acting, said she will take two more years to face the camera.
"I have always been connected to the industry. At the moment I am too busy as my son is too small. I will take two more years to face the camera," said Shilpa, who is married to businessman Raj Kundra. Their son will turn two in May this year.
Do you like this article?
|Posted by:||India-Forums.com Staff|
|User Rating||(1 Votes)|
i don't know why this pregnancy thing become so big in India esp in Bollywood...i somewhat agree with shilpa, in Bollywood every actress is equal, and they are here to work and crore of money is bid on them. but if film is delayed to 2-3 years then this pregnancy clause become unacceptable
Actor Rajkummar Rao reportedly slapped his "Hamari Adhuri Kahani" ...
The trailer presenting a glimpse of the love saga of Emraan Hashmi and ...