The Supreme Court Wednesday gave Bollywood actor Sanjay Dutt four more weeks to surrender following his conviction under the Arms Act in the 1993 Mumbai bombings case.
Holding that it was not inclined to grant six months' time as sought by Dutt to complete his pending film projects, the apex court bench of Justice P. Sathasivam and Justice B.S. Chauhan gave him four weeks to surrender, saying no further extension will be given.
The four weeks' time, the court said, will start from April 18. At the outset of the hearing, the court told senior lawyer Harish Salve: "You can't say that your client (Dutt) was unaware of his conviction and pending appeal before the Supreme Court."
The court said that "not only yourself (Salve), all those who invested Rs.278 crore in Dutt's film projects, were they not aware that a judgment is reserved in the appeal by the Bollywood actor?".
At the outset of the hearing, Salve told the court that he was not raising any legal ground and was seeking an extension of time to surrender purely on humanitarian grounds.
Appearing for the CBI, Additional Solicitor General Haren Raval opposed Dutt's plea for six months to complete his pending film projects beforesurrendering, saying that the same plea will be used as a precedent by other convicts for seeking enhancement of time to surrender.
He said that only a day earlier on Tuesday the court rejected the review petitions by the five convicts in the 1993 Mumbai bomb blast case.
The apex court had pronounced its order on March 21. While upholding Dutt's conviction under the Arms Act for possessing illegal arms, the court reduced his sentence from six to five years. The Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act court had sentenced him to undergo six years' imprisonment.
Sanjay Dutt has already completed one-and-half years in jail, thus he has to serve the remainder three-and-half years' sentence.
Do you like this article?
|Posted by:||India-Forums.com Staff|
|User Rating||(0 Votes)|
Already the court gave sanjay a lot of privilages by letting him to go for abroad while he was on trial. Now by granting him 4 weeks more it just shows that our judicial system is not treating celebrities as equal to normal people.Even every convict must be having some commitment in their life.Does the court allows everyone to go abroad or grant more time to surrender.In front of justice everyone should be treated equal.
i totally disagree with SC statement 'isn't the producers aware of his 'reserved judgment' ...
unbeleivable ..its been 20 yrs that they didnt deliver judgement ..if someone has to consider this statement , SC restricting ppl to earn n survive until they got their judgement whether it be positive or negative ... if ppl go by this , he has to wait for hell lot of 20 yrs to not take up any projects ...wat a crap statement by judges ...seriously !!!!
Filmmaker Rajkumar Hirani says Christmas is the perfect time to ... 3
Actress Alia Bhatt says she would love to be directed by her father ... 2