Bollwyood star Shah Rukh Khan was Tuesday at the centre of the latest round of sparring between two often uneasy neighbours with Pakistan's minister Rehman Malik's comment that India should provide the actor security prompting a sharp rebuke from New Delhi that Islamabad should mind its own 'minorities'.
Malik said in Islamabad that the Indian government should provide security to Shah Rukh, in the thick of a controversy over his remarks on being a Muslim that led to Jamaat-ud Dawa chief Hafiz Saeed saying the star could move to Pakistan.
Addressing reporters in Islamabad at a reception hosted by the Indian High Commissioner, Malik added that people of both Pakistan and India love Shah Rukh, reported Geo TV Tuesday.
India was quick to react.
Soon after Malik's remarks were reported in the media, Information and Broadcasting Minister Manish Tewari and Home Secretary R.K. Singh said Pakistan should worry about the state of affairs in its own country.
Both Tewari and R.K. Singh spoke in near identical terms to decry Malik's statement.
"Instead of introspection of how minorities in India are being treated he (Malik) should contemplate how he can improve condition of minority in his country," Tewari told reporters.
He said it would be better for Pakistan if Malik paid attention to domestic matters of his own country rather than worrying about such things.
"Test of democracy is the way you treat your minority rather than majority. The UPA (United Progressive Alliance) government has strived to see every citizen in the same light and given equal right under the constitution," he said.
The home secretary spoke out too.
"We are quite capable of looking after security of our own citizens... let him (Malik) worry about security of his own," he said.
Shah Rukh, one of Bollywood's more articulate personalities, had written in Outlook Turning Points magazine, published in association with The New York Times: "I sometimes become the inadvertent object of political leaders who choose to make me a symbol of all that they think is wrong and unpatriotic about Muslims in India."
"There have been occasions when I have been accused of bearing allegiance to our neighbouring nation rather than my own country - this even though I am an Indian, whose father fought for the freedom of India. Rallies have been held where leaders have exhorted me to leave and return what they refer to my original homeland," added the 47-year-old star.
He went on say that he became so sick of being mistaken for some crazed terrorist, "who co-incidentally carries the same name as mine that I made a film subtly titled 'My Name Is Khan' (and I am not a terrorist) to prove a point".
"Ironically, I was interrogated at the airport for hours about my last name when I was going to promote the film in America for the first time," he said.
Do you like this article?
|Posted by:||India-Forums.com Staff|
|User Rating||(0 Votes)|
Oh come on! Shah rukh is internationally famous, but that doesn mean ki advantages of it should be taken over.. Politicians wake up, der r mor serious matter in d country for u to fyt ova rather dan to make issue ova silly things.. An shah rukh ur awesom U don need to giv statement for al these stuffs.. V respect u a great human being an yes v can c ya patriotism towards d country an dat is y ONLY u could take india to international standards.. Love you shah God bless you
His father might have been a freedom fighter but srk is not patriotic and his many statements have proved it. And yes how can u show compassion for a neighbour that has bombed your country and stabbed india so many times. Show your patriotism by shunning them and encouraging the Indian talent.
This month, BollyCurry puts the chocolate boy Shahid Kapoor in the ... 17
Actor Uday Chopra, who will be seen in "Dhoom 3", says his biggest ... 10
Views : 1277