'Mission Impossible 4' - thrilling action, disappointing cinema

Film: 'Mission Impossible - Ghost Protocol': Cast: Tom Cruise, Jeremy Renner, Paula Patton; Director: Brad Bird; Rating: ** 1/2

Friday, December 16, 2011   |  Copyright: IANS  |  Comments 19 Comments  |  14032 Views

mission impossible 4

Film: 'Mission Impossible - Ghost Protocol': Cast: Tom Cruise, Jeremy Renner, Paula Patton; Director: Brad Bird; Rating: ** 1/2

Visually, two things that instantly transcend the immediate boundaries of a viewer's intellect to land straight inside are sex and violence. Thus brands that can no longer appeal to your intellect, or are too lazy to try, resort to either or both. That brand can either be a product or a movie star.

This is indeed a trend observed among male movie stars. Ageing stars, who no longer have the confidence of their youth, resort to movies that have an overdose of sex and violence. If you have followed Tom Cruise's selection of films lately, you would have observed an over-reliance on action at the cost of other factors. 'Mission Impossible 4' is no different.

He unabashedly stays within the confines of done-to-death cliches to give you not a film, but a roughly stitched collage of some very well done action sequences. Thus, what is sacrificed at this altar of dreary cliches are story, characterization, plot, subplots... basically everything that makes a film a fun watch.

mission impossible 4

The story of 'Ghost Protocol' is simpler than the elaborate charades you made up as kids. Smoked out of a Russian prison, Ethan Hunt and his renegade team, have to hunt down a Russian scientist with launch codes for nuclear warheads and save the world.

Along the way there are some lame dialogues, some pretences at making up subplots and a star way past his prime, trying desperately to hold on to the action genre like his character hangs to the ledge of a building.

After seeing 'Ghost Protocol' as a discerning viewer, you'll realize that Tom Cruise has lost the plot, figuratively and literally. All his recent films have been shoddy excuses in the name of cinema, but had very good action. The Church of Scientology does not seem to be helping our star. He needs to enroll himself in the church of cinema.

The action scenes do not disappoint. They are elaborately conceptualized, beautifully shot and adeptly edited to make you sit at the edge of your seat. Tom Cruise might have forgotten other things, but he hasn't forgotten the art of choosing the best action team in the industry.

The film thus ends up being a never-ending action ride from the windows of the world's tallest building, to the tunnel under the world's worst prison to the streets of Mumbai and into a parking lot apparently located in India, but which you know will not exist in the country for the next few decades.

If you want to watch the film for it being shot in India, and for Anil Kapoor, you'll be sorely disappointed. Only two minutes of actual India make it to the film. The other shots thought to be filmed in the country, have actually been shot in Indian localities of North America. Kapoor barely has a few minutes' role as a lecherous business tycoon. It's not enough either for his fans or his detractors.

The mission impossible for a star is thus actually mission simple. If you indeed choose to accept mission stardom you get to date beautiful women, hobnob with the richest men and pretend as if your existence mattered. Sadly, cinema, in such pursuit of name and fame, becomes a necessary evil to be shot, chased and exploded out of a film just like its villains.


Do you like this article?

Posted by: India-Forums.com Staff
User Rating User Rating(9 Votes)
  sastatoday, GreatSV, Khushixoxo, Nikhi., charu_81, Luv4games, Pratamesh, --ambar--, samicute
Views 14032

User Comments & Ratings

Join India Forums for free to comment on this story. Have an account already? Use Quick Login to comment.

Related Celebrities

Anil Kapoor Anil Kapoor
(29)
(101)
(113)

  • Posted on: 19 January 2012 at 12:04amak28it

    fine movie but topic is more common like 16 december

  • Posted on: 10 January 2012 at 11:24amsastatoday

    Awesome movie great picturisation, great acting, great direction, great action, and as always Tom Cruise really Rocks. A must watch movie for all.

  • Posted on: 25 December 2011 at 9:42amcharu_81

    I saw this movie yesterday and enjoyed it. Here in India also this movie is being liked. Just ignore this article and go , watch it...

    Edited on:25 December 2011 at 9:46am

  • Posted on: 19 December 2011 at 1:21amSophiee

    It's an eye-candy with lots of loopholes. The movie is best
    experienced in an Wave Cinemas theater. Story of the movie is nothing special -
    but the way it's executed is awesome. Dubai shines in the movie, though
    some shots of the city were factually incorrect. Though a shot of Mumbai's Queen's Necklace is shown, that's where it ends as well. Everything else they portrayed as Mumbai was actually shot in another location. The Indian party scene was shot in Zabeel Saray in Dubai. And they showed Sun TV's TV station as being in Mumbai (when it was actually supposed to be Bangalore), which by the way was being manned by just two security guards! Anil Kapoor's potential
    was totally wasted and he looked more like a fool in the movie. Lots of
    continuation errors, though overall, the movie is good for a one time
    watch.

  • Posted on: 17 December 2011 at 4:56amKhushi-Singh

    I thought the movie was great ! i loved it !

  • Posted on: 17 December 2011 at 3:21amTuhinaSinha

    The movie really thrills, both the plot and the action plus the actors...this article seems to be one blind one's vision about the movie...who seems to be preoccupied with his/her personal disgust for Tom Cruise..So, this is obviously not a genuine review. !!!
    The movie has all the elements requiring to be a block buster here in India or else in the world. Good cinema is the same everywhere !!

  • Posted on: 17 December 2011 at 1:39amsamicute

    thank for the good news...

  • Posted on: 17 December 2011 at 12:44amShaina_b

    This is too biased an article!!!!!!

  • Posted on: 16 December 2011 at 9:14pm_Ananya_

    I don't understand why the people from the west are dissing Indian tastes in movies just by one article? This article was the author's own opinion and does not reflect the tastes of the Indian audiences or India. Our world doesn't revolve *only* around lovestories. And if u people have that much of a problem with India, Indians and Indian tastes, what are u doing on INDIA forums?

    3 member(s) Liked the above comment :
    TuhinaSinha, memario, Pratamesh
  • Posted on: 16 December 2011 at 7:45pmbithee

    I dont know why people rating is bad, its already a hit and going to be a blockbuster...and who is the critics here to judge here.

Bollywood Film Reviews Articles Index

 


Bollywood Search

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.